Home› College Football Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Check Down Champ

LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
edited November 2023 in College Football Forum


The stats simple do not lie.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,275
    I saw a stat today that Nix only has 17 completions on the year going further than 20 yards. Daniels has 20 TD passes going longer than 20 yards
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    bananasnblondes said:

    I saw a stat today that Nix only has 17 completions on the year going further than 20 yards. Daniels has 20 TD passes going longer than 20 yards

    Look up. It’s says 22.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    EsophagealFeces said:

    I know this was supposed to be a huge own, but those stats are pretty impressive. Pull stats for Penix, Williams, etc. I doubt they’re that much different as far as completion percentages. I doubt there are many guys completing 70% 20+ yards downfield. 28% seems high for passes behind the LOS, but it’s not like he sucks throwing it downfield. Fuck Nix, and fuck Oregon, but still.

    It is impressive. But the stats are HEAVILY skewed with 28% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage. Only 11% is more than 20 yard passes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IslandDawgIslandDawg Member Posts: 73
    Are there stats when he chokes in big games?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,093 Swaye's Wigwam
    LawDawg1 said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    I know this was supposed to be a huge own, but those stats are pretty impressive. Pull stats for Penix, Williams, etc. I doubt they’re that much different as far as completion percentages. I doubt there are many guys completing 70% 20+ yards downfield. 28% seems high for passes behind the LOS, but it’s not like he sucks throwing it downfield. Fuck Nix, and fuck Oregon, but still.

    It is impressive. But the stats are HEAVILY skewed with 28% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage. Only 11% is more than 20 yard passes.
    I agree, 28% seems really high. Penix is probably under 10%, maybe under 5%. If Penix and Grubb did a better job taking what the defense gave them like Oregon, we’d probably be number 1 or 2, as we’d have blown the shit out of ASU, Stanford, and OSU. The ASU and Stanford games are the reason we’re barely in the top 4. Penix also would have half his INTs, more yards, more TDs, and probably would have already locked up the Heisman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,091 Standard Supporter
    He hits people in stride on time every play. He is good and consistent. No hate on nix. He is way better than last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,723
    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    ntxduck said:

    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying

    Nix is 3rd lowest of all P5 QBs on depth of pass at an average of 7 yards. Use some stats to prove me wrong or prove your point.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    AtomicDawg said:

    He hits people in stride on time every play. He is good and consistent. No hate on nix. He is way better than last year.

    This is true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,723
    edited November 2023
    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying

    Nix is 3rd lowest of all P5 QBs on depth of pass at an average of 7 yards. Use some stats to prove me wrong or prove your point.
    No one is disputing that. Thinking that the data you presented makes him look like some check down artist though just shows you can’t interpret data correctly. Your brethren already called you out nicely for it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    ntxduck said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying

    Nix is 3rd lowest of all P5 QBs on depth of pass at an average of 7 yards. Use some stats to prove me wrong or prove your point.
    No one is disputing that. Thinking that the data you presented makes him look like some check down artist though just shows you can’t interpret data correctly. Your brethren already called you out nicely for it
    Nearly 1/3 of all passes behind the line of scrimmage and 3rd lowest depth of passes of all P5 QBs at 7 yards. This is undisputed. I guess we are interpreting data differently. Happens every day. I agree Nix hits receivers in stride and is massively improved. But he’s still the check down champ. If that makes him win, what’s wrong with that? How is there a need to defend that if the stats are not in dispute?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,427
    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying

    Nix is 3rd lowest of all P5 QBs on depth of pass at an average of 7 yards. Use some stats to prove me wrong or prove your point.
    No one is disputing that. Thinking that the data you presented makes him look like some check down artist though just shows you can’t interpret data correctly. Your brethren already called you out nicely for it
    Nearly 1/3 of all passes behind the line of scrimmage and 3rd lowest depth of passes of all P5 QBs at 7 yards. This is undisputed. I guess we are interpreting data differently. Happens every day. I agree Nix hits receivers in stride and is massively improved. But he’s still the check down champ. If that makes him win, what’s wrong with that? How is there a need to defend that if the stats are not in dispute?
    My argument would be. Isn’t it a good thing that a QB takes exactly what the defense gives him almost every time?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    greenblood said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    LawDawg1 said:

    ntxduck said:

    Reading data can be hard. Keep trying

    Nix is 3rd lowest of all P5 QBs on depth of pass at an average of 7 yards. Use some stats to prove me wrong or prove your point.
    No one is disputing that. Thinking that the data you presented makes him look like some check down artist though just shows you can’t interpret data correctly. Your brethren already called you out nicely for it
    Nearly 1/3 of all passes behind the line of scrimmage and 3rd lowest depth of passes of all P5 QBs at 7 yards. This is undisputed. I guess we are interpreting data differently. Happens every day. I agree Nix hits receivers in stride and is massively improved. But he’s still the check down champ. If that makes him win, what’s wrong with that? How is there a need to defend that if the stats are not in dispute?
    My argument would be. Isn’t it a good thing that a QB takes exactly what the defense gives him almost every time?
    That’s what I basically said in what you quoted me saying. Wish we would do that a bit more. Doesn’t change the fact he’s the checkdown champ. No one is doing it better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.