Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Imaginary lover

16781012

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    1960 Rose Bowl MVP




    Was this a “National Championship Game” ?
    It certainly meets the stringent UW standards.
    Talking football history with Ducks is like talking about the past with Germans. They avoid the subject.
    I think the main issue is none of you can keep your stories straight.

    My favorite modern Husky trend is hating Oregon so much you’re now discounting everything you used to hold dear.
    My stories on Oregon vs UW have always been straight.

    I hate Oregon. I danced on the Zero in 2002.

    1960- 2023 UW Football > 1960- 2023 UO Football

    2003- 23 UO Football > 2003- 23 UW Football

    I like living in Oregon. Cool fucking state.
    I think you got some numbers mixed up above but I understand the intent and agree.

    So what makes you think we don’t like talking about history?

    There it is. Did anyone die?
    I think there are stereotypes of each fan base that often hold in real life. I've talked to plenty of Duck fans over the years who attempt to equate Washington with Minnesota. Not saying this is you guys, but there's more than a few.
    You're not Minnesota. You've had some success more recently than Minnesota. But you are like Minnesota in the sense that your best years are behind you.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club
    @iDawg and I invented the Minnesota comparison on our pod cast

    The point was once you accept losing the easier it is to keep losing and the harder it is to win again

    Minnesota was a dominant power from the 20s to 1960

    Not much since

    A cautionary tale
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,695 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    1960 Rose Bowl MVP




    Was this a “National Championship Game” ?
    It certainly meets the stringent UW standards.
    Talking football history with Ducks is like talking about the past with Germans. They avoid the subject.
    I think the main issue is none of you can keep your stories straight.

    My favorite modern Husky trend is hating Oregon so much you’re now discounting everything you used to hold dear.
    My stories on Oregon vs UW have always been straight.

    I hate Oregon. I danced on the Zero in 2002.

    1960- 2023 UW Football > 1960- 2023 UO Football

    2003- 23 UO Football > 2003- 23 UW Football

    I like living in Oregon. Cool fucking state.
    I think you got some numbers mixed up above but I understand the intent and agree.

    So what makes you think we don’t like talking about history?

    There it is. Did anyone die?
    I think there are stereotypes of each fan base that often hold in real life. I've talked to plenty of Duck fans over the years who attempt to equate Washington with Minnesota. Not saying this is you guys, but there's more than a few.
    You're not Minnesota. You've had some success more recently than Minnesota. But you are like Minnesota in the sense that your best years are behind you.
    Well, it's pretty fucking hard to top the success that UW had from 1990- 92. But here we are at 20-2 under a new coach fighting for a play off berth.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    1960 Rose Bowl MVP




    Was this a “National Championship Game” ?
    It certainly meets the stringent UW standards.
    Talking football history with Ducks is like talking about the past with Germans. They avoid the subject.
    I think the main issue is none of you can keep your stories straight.

    My favorite modern Husky trend is hating Oregon so much you’re now discounting everything you used to hold dear.
    My stories on Oregon vs UW have always been straight.

    I hate Oregon. I danced on the Zero in 2002.

    1960- 2023 UW Football > 1960- 2023 UO Football

    2003- 23 UO Football > 2003- 23 UW Football

    I like living in Oregon. Cool fucking state.
    I think you got some numbers mixed up above but I understand the intent and agree.

    So what makes you think we don’t like talking about history?

    There it is. Did anyone die?
    I think there are stereotypes of each fan base that often hold in real life. I've talked to plenty of Duck fans over the years who attempt to equate Washington with Minnesota. Not saying this is you guys, but there's more than a few.
    You're not Minnesota. You've had some success more recently than Minnesota. But you are like Minnesota in the sense that your best years are behind you.
    Well, it's pretty fucking hard to top the success that UW had from 1990- 92. But here we are at 20-2 under a new coach fighting for a play off berth.
    We survived Gilby, Ty and Sark

    Now we have a big dick president and legal paying of players

    Look out
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    SFGbob said:

    1960 Rose Bowl MVP




    Was this a “National Championship Game” ?
    It certainly meets the stringent UW standards.
    Talking football history with Ducks is like talking about the past with Germans. They avoid the subject.
    I think the main issue is none of you can keep your stories straight.

    My favorite modern Husky trend is hating Oregon so much you’re now discounting everything you used to hold dear.
    My stories on Oregon vs UW have always been straight.

    I hate Oregon. I danced on the Zero in 2002.

    1960- 2023 UW Football > 1960- 2023 UO Football

    2003- 23 UO Football > 2003- 23 UW Football

    I like living in Oregon. Cool fucking state.
    I think you got some numbers mixed up above but I understand the intent and agree.

    So what makes you think we don’t like talking about history?

    There it is. Did anyone die?
    I think there are stereotypes of each fan base that often hold in real life. I've talked to plenty of Duck fans over the years who attempt to equate Washington with Minnesota. Not saying this is you guys, but there's more than a few.
    You're not Minnesota. You've had some success more recently than Minnesota. But you are like Minnesota in the sense that your best years are behind you.
    Well, it's pretty fucking hard to top the success that UW had from 1990- 92. But here we are at 20-2 under a new coach fighting for a play off berth.
    We survived Gilby, Ty and Sark

    Now we have a big dick president and legal paying of players

    Look out

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,695 Founders Club

    @iDawg and I invented the Minnesota comparison on our pod cast

    The point was once you accept losing the easier it is to keep losing and the harder it is to win again

    Minnesota was a dominant power from the 20s to 1960

    Not much since

    A cautionary tale

    That was GOOD podcast. The first sports ball podcast I ever listened to.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    @iDawg and I invented the Minnesota comparison on our pod cast

    The point was once you accept losing the easier it is to keep losing and the harder it is to win again

    Minnesota was a dominant power from the 20s to 1960

    Not much since

    A cautionary tale

    That was GOOD podcast. The first sports ball podcast I ever listened to.
    Minnesota has 8 titles. Huskys have always exaggerated their accomplishments.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club

    @iDawg and I invented the Minnesota comparison on our pod cast

    The point was once you accept losing the easier it is to keep losing and the harder it is to win again

    Minnesota was a dominant power from the 20s to 1960

    Not much since

    A cautionary tale

    That was GOOD podcast. The first sports ball podcast I ever listened to.
    Minnesota has 8 titles. Huskys have always exaggerated their accomplishments.
    Oregon wouldn't recognize them

    Hope this helps
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    @iDawg and I invented the Minnesota comparison on our pod cast

    The point was once you accept losing the easier it is to keep losing and the harder it is to win again

    Minnesota was a dominant power from the 20s to 1960

    Not much since

    A cautionary tale

    That was GOOD podcast. The first sports ball podcast I ever listened to.
    Minnesota has 8 titles. Huskys have always exaggerated their accomplishments.
    Oregon wouldn't recognize them

    Hope this helps
    I would recognize any that are legit polls, as always. Not random newspapers or bakeries.

    I’ve been very clear in this.