The reasoning behind Dawgman predicting 11 wins

DerekJohnson

Back in August 2008, Kim told me that he was constantly saying on the message boards that Tyrone needed to win 10 games that year because if that became everyone's expectation and he failed, then it would help push him out of here. Kim was downright giddy about it; he thought it was very clever.

So now I'm being told that Kim and Co. are saying it needs to be 11 wins for Petersen, and it's the same agenda.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Stop twisting.

GrundleStiltzkin

Bitter & political

DerekJohnson

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Bitter & political

don't forget money grab

MikeDamone

But can he go 5-4?

Vegasdawg

I think we have covered this. Kim is upset that he lost access to the program and has decided to take it out on the 2nd ranked college coach in the nation. It's just the way he rolls right now...I think most observant people are aware of this and pay little heed to irrational comments like that.

no_uh

NOGAF, remove the tin foil hats. Petersen isn't 2008 Ty.

DerekJohnson

no_uh said:

NOGAF, remove the tin foil hats. Petersen isn't 2008 Ty.

One glance at our boards show that a lot of people care.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Petersen will win 12 and Kim will credit Sark for that.

chrisvashon

MikeDamone said:

But can he go 5-4?

Blowout Oregon state. Nothing else matters.

dnc

FKG

Gladstone

That anything the hobbit spews from his old, fat mouth is entirely self-serving is a foregone conclusion.

Tequilla

This is funny ...

In January, Butler Cabin was so convinced in the super secret chat room that we'd struggle this year under Petersen that he offered to make a $10k donation to the UW Athletic Department in my name if we won 11+ games this year (before the bowl game).

Now, Kim Jong Vino is holding that as the minimum acceptable result this year from Petersen.

It would be absolutely wrong for anybody to bring that up to KJV and Butler Cabin.

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

The thing that pisses me off about the shit going on over there by that trio is that for once they are "Demanding" 10/11 wins. But the only fucking reason they are saying that is out of hope Peterman doesn't get there and he gets the heat turned up on him.

Reality is that as we go forward with Peterman, the better his teams will get. I fully expect to win 10 games this year, but going forward as he gets his guys into his system I expect us to really fucking roll. Kim is going to get fucked by the patience of Seattle fans, Petersen could go 8-5 this year and not be on a hot seat (That's not happening for the record), give this guy 4 years he will get us to a Rose Bowl.

In short; Kim, you are fucked.

CheersWestDawg

Jesus.

When the fuck did Kim or Fleecock ever expect 10 or 11 wins from Sark? NEVER. They were too busy letting Sark rest his balls on their chins.

Every time Aubbie was in early season form and demanded double digit wins, Kim would bring out the knives.

Now, since Kim's ego is bigger than Fetter's ass he thinks he can turn up the heat on Pete? Fuck him. The only website that has any credibility to turn up the heat will be this one.

Oh, and fuck Dick Baird.

MisterEm

MikeDamone said:

But can he go 5-4?

Does he have the sizzle for p12 play?

Fire_Marshall_Bill

You should post more here Vegasdawg.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Kim, you ignorant slut, we didn't fire Sark.. Who the fuck did you want to hire? Mora turned us down. Why the sour grapes? The access thing is obviously the driving factor. But what does that matter, their reporting was horribly inaccurate and common knowledge anyway. If i see that fucker i'm blindsiding him and dragging him to my tailgate for a community bootfest.