"Lake, who filed the lawsuit during her failed campaign for governor in 2022, challenged whether the state’s electronic voting machines assured “a fair and accurate vote.” Two lower courts dismissed the suit, finding that Lake and former Republican state lawmaker Mark Finchem had not been harmed in a way that allowed them to sue.
Calling the precise nature of Lake’s claim “not clear,” the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the lawsuit was based on speculative concerns that the machines could be hacked."
BOY that's a surprise. No evidence of fraud in this election. Listening to some of you, you had all this great evidence. What happened? Honestly, I would sue some of you for libel if I knew who you were and then we'll see how many of this "evidence' gets posted on this board.
Congrats for sourcing the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit C of Apps as your source. Their reversal rate of 79% at the Supreme Court wouldn't make any difference to you TDS types, would it?
THATS your excuse? Boy thats very convenient. Anyone convicted of a crime should just say they're innocent but the courts don't wanna be involved and then we should take them at their word and set them free.
Its amazing when it comes times to actually prove something, you can't.
And with that, Sledog wins the "EverettChris Stupidity" award of the day with that logic.
It's obvious that election was tilted and probably rigged. I've never seen so much gross incompetence. Some or most of it was intentional. You read whatever lamestream media hacks vomit out though.
Comments
Supreme Court Throws Out Kari Lake's lawsuit:
"Lake, who filed the lawsuit during her failed campaign for governor in 2022, challenged whether the state’s electronic voting machines assured “a fair and accurate vote.” Two lower courts dismissed the suit, finding that Lake and former Republican state lawmaker Mark Finchem had not been harmed in a way that allowed them to sue.
Calling the precise nature of Lake’s claim “not clear,” the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the lawsuit was based on speculative concerns that the machines could be hacked."
BOY that's a surprise. No evidence of fraud in this election. Listening to some of you, you had all this great evidence. What happened? Honestly, I would sue some of you for libel if I knew who you were and then we'll see how many of this "evidence' gets posted on this board.
No standing for evey suit. We've mentioned the courts don't want to be involved. Doesn't mean shit didn't happen. Your stupidity on display as usual.
Congrats for sourcing the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit C of Apps as your source. Their reversal rate of 79% at the Supreme Court wouldn't make any difference to you TDS types, would it?
Read up just on AZ dumbass.
THATS your excuse? Boy thats very convenient. Anyone convicted of a crime should just say they're innocent but the courts don't wanna be involved and then we should take them at their word and set them free.
Its amazing when it comes times to actually prove something, you can't.
And with that, Sledog wins the "EverettChris Stupidity" award of the day with that logic.
That short bus slammed the brakes on a lot didn't it!
It's obvious that election was tilted and probably rigged. I've never seen so much gross incompetence. Some or most of it was intentional. You read whatever lamestream media hacks vomit out though.
[Citation Needed]
Plenty of citations were given already.
I have bad news for you in regards to what a citation is.
What's your preferred source?
Nothing to see. No proof…
If you are still talking but protecting democracy today you are a drooling retard or a communist. Why not both?
The key was changing contest or question to OVERTURN. The left owns the language. And the hypocrisy
AS I was saying
Hey @MelloDawg More evidence, troll