Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I heard it's the same two teams and now the game is at UW...

bisonduck
bisonduck Member Posts: 735
edited February 16 in College Football Forum
easy UW win. Gotta love that type of analysis.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,675 Founders Club
    Are we talking about playing Cornell or reflecting on getting prison raped by Holy Cross or what are we doing here?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    Oregons defense appears to be much better but I can not confirm at this time.

    Offense is still very good but not as good.

    Teams are even in different ways.

    I think Oregon is more flimsy. Washington looks more consistent.

    If the game was in Eugene I’d pick the Ducks.

    But it’s not.

    I think Washington will win by 14-17.

    Someone get me on TV.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,518 Standard Supporter
    14/22 from Oregon’s 2 deep on defense did not play in the UW game last year. The teams aren’t really the same in that regard.

    My worry is that Stein is too pass happy(60/40) and that Oregon should lean on running the ball and their pass rush. Meathead Mario at least understood to some extent that you win up front on the road.

    Although, UW Seeks pretty limp dick in terms of rushing the passer so maybe we say fuck it and let Bo cook.

    I’ll LIPO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,968 Founders Club
    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,518 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them

    Shough hurt Oregon more with his legs than with his arm. Oregon threw him all over the place. TTU had as many yards on PI calls as they did through the air.

    I wouldn’t use that game to translate over, but whatever. Oregon secondary is much better from last year. Even when a WR gets open/makes a catch, they’re tackled immediately.

    Last year guys running wide the fuck open and then 2 missed tackles. I have zero complaints about Oregon’s defense this year, but they haven’t really played anyone.

    Like I said…LIPO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 735
    edited October 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them

    Oregon's portal players got cooked in that game and subsequently played a lot better. They were in phase and played the ball well against Colorado's skill players. That was something they didn't do against Tech.

    Oregon's roster management was a lot more aggressive than UW's, so things were never going to be as clean in the first half of the season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,968 Founders Club
    bisonduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them

    Oregon's portal players got cooked in that game and subsequently played a lot better. They were in phase and played the ball well against Colorado's skill players. That was something they didn't do against Tech.

    Oregon's roster management was a lot more aggressive than UW's, so things were never going to be as clean in the first half of the season.
    Excuses are early this year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,518 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2023
    I don’t need any excuses.

    I think Oregon is better.

    But they were better last year and lost, soooo…
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 735
    edited October 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    bisonduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them

    Oregon's portal players got cooked in that game and subsequently played a lot better. They were in phase and played the ball well against Colorado's skill players. That was something they didn't do against Tech.

    Oregon's roster management was a lot more aggressive than UW's, so things were never going to be as clean in the first half of the season.
    Excuses are early this year
    Nope. I thought overhauling the team with the front end schedule was perfect. Oregon had 5 games to break in the new players.

    It was about as good as it gets for the oline as well, which is much better equipped to handle ZTF and Trice than last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RaceBannon said:

    The Oregon secondary was burnt toast against Shuck

    Good luck against Penix

    Might want to cover Polk this year. Few teams can cover 4 deep. Oregon isn't one of them

    I like to point to TS rather than how Oregon mauled CU and Sanders.

    That’s what I like to do.

    A midget in his first start kept AZ in the game til the end. 3 TD passes. Your secondary is shit and Trice is MIA so far. Almost like he’s playing not to get hurt before the draft.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter