Home› Duck Refuge

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rumor out of Seattle about Ryan Grubb

haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
in Duck Refuge
Players think he's an asshole for taking an interview with Saban.

Wanted him to be a nobody piece of shit from UTSA.

But it doesn't matter what the players think, as long as he produces. Just ask Jon Donovan after winning a North Division Title.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited July 2023
    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,824
    edited July 2023
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    Oregon has better odds than UW to win the conference, q-anon

    Not saying I agree with it. But Oregons 2nd favs behind usc
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,768 Swaye's Wigwam
    ntxduck said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    Oregon has better odds than UW to win the conference, q-anon

    Not saying I agree with it. But Oregons 2nd favs behind usc
    There’s no way Dumb Lanning is gonna let that happen
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    Yeah I guess since Penix Odunze and McMillan aren't 5 stars they won't be able to prison rape Oregon's defense up and down the field in Eugene.
    5* and high 4*. This is what wins NC. Not beating your rival by 3 points. Gawd you’re just so fucking dumb. It’s sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    Yeah I guess since Penix Odunze and McMillan aren't 5 stars they won't be able to prison rape Oregon's defense up and down the field in Eugene.
    5* and high 4*. This is what wins NC. Not beating your rival by 3 points. Gawd you’re just so fucking dumb. It’s sad.
    You know what else doesn't win NC's?

    Shit 36 yo immature head coaches who get ran on for an entire half by beavlet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    Yeah I guess since Penix Odunze and McMillan aren't 5 stars they won't be able to prison rape Oregon's defense up and down the field in Eugene.
    5* and high 4*. This is what wins NC. Not beating your rival by 3 points. Gawd you’re just so fucking dumb. It’s sad.
    You know what else doesn't win NC's?

    Shit 36 yo immature head coaches who get ran on for an entire half by beavlet.
    90-11 beat the rookie with Peterman’s guys.

    Two years and uw goes back to yearly Oregon roadkill.

    uw NIL. 90-11 thinks it sucks. If he were being honest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sure thing Skippy.

    Bow Down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,744
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    Who is talking about winning the natty?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,744
    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    You said win the natty, not make the CFP. Tell me how many 5 and 4 stars were on TCU's roster last season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    You said win the natty, not make the CFP. Tell me how many 5 and 4 stars were on TCU's roster last season.
    Clearly not enough.

    Big-12 was vastly overrated last year.

    They went 2-6 in bowls games, worst among P-5 schools. Best loss was Kansas v Arkansas.

    TCU ran a weak conference.

    Stars aligned for them. See Baylor miracle.

    It happens.

    I don't think the Pac-12 this year compared to the Big-12 of last year will produce a team as weak as TCU if one makes a CFP/NC. My money is on SC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    They are.

    UW never quit last year. And our? defense at least showed something in the 4th quarter of the Oregon games + Apple Cup plus held Texas to 3 in the first half.

    Hell, held Oregon to 10 in the first half.

    "historical facts" wtf are you talking about?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    They are.

    UW never quit last year. And our? defense at least showed something in the 4th quarter of the Oregon games + Apple Cup plus held Texas to 3 in the first half.

    Hell, held Oregon to 10 in the first half.

    "historical facts" wtf are you talking about?
    Worthy drops another TD!

    Texas stopped themselves from scoring.

    HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,008 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2023
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    They are.

    UW never quit last year. And our? defense at least showed something in the 4th quarter of the Oregon games + Apple Cup plus held Texas to 3 in the first half.

    Hell, held Oregon to 10 in the first half.

    "historical facts" wtf are you talking about?
    Worthy drops another TD!

    Texas stopped themselves from scoring.

    HTH.
    It's really hard to be this big of a loser on this site.

    Congrats buddy.

    Pale ale?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    They are.

    UW never quit last year. And our? defense at least showed something in the 4th quarter of the Oregon games + Apple Cup plus held Texas to 3 in the first half.

    Hell, held Oregon to 10 in the first half.

    "historical facts" wtf are you talking about?
    Worthy drops another TD!

    Texas stopped themselves from scoring.

    HTH.
    It's really hard to be this big of a loser on this site.

    Congrats buddy.

    Pale ale?
    So Worthy didn't drop a couple of easy TD passes?

    Fuck off Slackjaw.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,744
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Must include Oregon slam in every poast.

    Not at all obsessed.

    Guy had a chance to play for an NC this year.

    Now he's not even favored to win a CCG.

    UW and SC are pretty much interchangeable to win it.

    However no one seems to be buying the quook line.

    You guys should beat beavlet at home though. That will be nice.
    No they’re not. SC is better. No team since 2010 has won a NC with less than 14 super blue chip recruits. That’s 5 and high 4*. SC has 14. Oregon is second with 9.

    HTH.
    No PAC 12 team is winning the NC, so what the fuck is your point?
    Dipshit said SC and uw are interchangeable.

    SC has better odds to make the CFP and win the NC.

    That's based on historical facts.

    Not interchangeable as dipshit claims.
    They are.

    UW never quit last year. And our? defense at least showed something in the 4th quarter of the Oregon games + Apple Cup plus held Texas to 3 in the first half.

    Hell, held Oregon to 10 in the first half.

    "historical facts" wtf are you talking about?
    Worthy drops another TD!

    Texas stopped themselves from scoring.

    HTH.
    It's really hard to be this big of a loser on this site.

    Congrats buddy.

    Pale ale?
    So Worthy didn't drop a couple of easy TD passes?

    Fuck off Slackjaw.
    You are the king of "if's and but's being pussy..."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.