I’m not going to invest the effort. Who really did it?
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some.
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this. Must. Defend. Narrative.
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some. I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....orThe hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building. An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.You should probably do a little more research.There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some. I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....orThe hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building. An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.You should probably do a little more research.There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts. So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this. Must. Defend. Narrative. There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this. Must. Defend. Narrative. There is no narrative. Just use your common sense? Common sense questions for dummies. What does it mean to “pull the building”?From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Funny.... this video showing the missile hitting the pentagram is making the rounds on Bitch ute.Coincidence?https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ux9AD5Axk5Fq/(Not sure if external links other than Twitter or Youtube are working.. video was posted on Bitch ute 5 hours ago)
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some. I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....orThe hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building. An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.You should probably do a little more research.There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts. Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that. Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?You’re really defending short-bus riders everywhere today.
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some. I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....orThe hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building. An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.You should probably do a little more research.There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts. Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that. Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?You’re really defending short-bus riders everywhere today. There were plenty of plane parts there. And bodies
I’m not going to invest the effort. Who really did it? When have you ever?
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI*In before this is nuked by youtube Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this. Must. Defend. Narrative. There is no narrative. Just use your common sense? Common sense questions for dummies. What does it mean to “pull the building”?From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU They were talking about pulling the firefighters from the building because it was too dangerous.
I’m not going to invest the effort. Who really did it? When have you ever? Contrails occupies all my time.Birds aren’t real.
Good grief. The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable. The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left. To some. I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....orThe hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building. An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.You should probably do a little more research.There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts. So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists. Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway. You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Quadruple post loser.
Quadruple post loser. Peanut gallery weighs in. LOL..z
