SR,YK

HHusky

https://www.newsweek.com/ex-trump-officials-ominous-warning-about-classified-documents-mishandling-1805816

"I found the indictment to be a really vivid picture for the American public of what the national security community dealt with for four years when he was president," Neumann, who served during the Trump administration, said while making an appearance on ABC News' This Week.

Sources

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

HHusky

Sources said:

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

RaceBannon

Sources said:

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

Groundhog day

WestlinnDuck

Sources said:

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

The dazzler wants to make clear that he doesn't support the equal application of the law. Only applies to republicans and not democrat candidates. Hillary's unsecured illegal private server was just an honest mistake. And there was never any coverup at all, just smashed phones and bleached hard drives. Nothing to see.

pawz

Sources said:

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

Faggot awareness month.

HH being the chief faggot.

LoneStarDawg

It’s important that we all pause for a minute and contemplate the lived experience of the intelligence community

Blueduck

Here's some light reading, because inquiring minds want to know

https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

WestlinnDuck

Blueduck said:

Here's some light reading, because inquiring minds want to know

https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

While not pertinent to the Article II powers of the actual President, the dissent sets out the correct view of Presidential powers.

=========

Dissenting in this case, Chief Judge Markey insisted that the “authority to grant or
deny a security clearance is committed to the sound discretion of executive agency heads.
See Exec. Order 10450 . . .”19 He objected that the majority’s decision “will dilute the
responsibility the President placed on” the armed services and executive agencies and ran
“clearly contrary to well-established principles of deference owed national security
determinations of executive agencies.”20 To him, the protection of classified information
“is an executive responsibility flowing from the President’s constitutional mandate to
provide for the national defense. U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2.”21 Section 2 of Article II does
not vest all of national defense in the President. Important powers and duties are
expressly reserved to Congress under Article I. One problem with a national security
case like Egan is that the Justice Department is always present to defend and promote
executive power but the attorney representing the private party is in no position, either
through capacity or incentive, to defend and promote congressional power.

Blueduck

WestlinnDuck said:

Blueduck said:

Here's some light reading, because inquiring minds want to know

https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

While not pertinent to the Article II powers of the actual President, the dissent sets out the correct view of Presidential powers.

=========

Dissenting in this case, Chief Judge Markey insisted that the “authority to grant or
deny a security clearance is committed to the sound discretion of executive agency heads.
See Exec. Order 10450 . . .”19 He objected that the majority’s decision “will dilute the
responsibility the President placed on” the armed services and executive agencies and ran
“clearly contrary to well-established principles of deference owed national security
determinations of executive agencies.”20 To him, the protection of classified information
“is an executive responsibility flowing from the President’s constitutional mandate to
provide for the national defense. U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2.”21 Section 2 of Article II does
not vest all of national defense in the President. Important powers and duties are
expressly reserved to Congress under Article I. One problem with a national security
case like Egan is that the Justice Department is always present to defend and promote
executive power but the attorney representing the private party is in no position, either
through capacity or incentive, to defend and promote congressional power.

Page 7 section F

PurpleThrobber

RaceBannon said:

Sources said:

You keep posting this stuff. Why?

Groundhog day

Hondo-riffic.