Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dominion $788 Million, "Let's make shit up" conspiracy theories = $0

1235

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,561 Standard Supporter
    AOG swallows that's all everyone needs to know.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited April 2023
    The Clinton campaign tried to hide their payments for the Dossier, claiming legal fees, because it was such a legitimate campaign operation.

    Just some info they were able to pick up from the nasty Russians that Trump was courting. Sounded so ordinary when your corrupt media framed it this way.

    Right AOG?
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,836
    Russia started due to a guy in the Trump campaign drinking and blabbing that they had access to the hack
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,434 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    Russia started due to a guy in the Trump campaign drinking and blabbing that they had access to the hack

    You're only 6 years behind

    Uninformed hack
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,496 Standard Supporter

    AOG said:

    Russia started due to a guy in the Trump campaign drinking and blabbing that they had access to the hack

    You're only 6 years behind

    Uninformed hack
    @AOG is Team Moldova.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023
    AOG said:

    Just imagine the outrage of rats when Trump didn't sue every single msm outlet that falsely accused Trump of colluding with the Russians.

    I guess with the socialists, as history has taught us, there is only one side of justice and that is the side of the bad guy rats.

    We've been through this countless times... "collusion" is not a legal term. You can't convict someone of collusion, which was never investigated and means nothing in a legal sense. They did not find conspiracy which is a crime. Trump gladly welcomed the help of Putin.
    How about some facts supporting that conclusion, eh?

    Mueller couldn't find any. Maybe you can.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    AOG said:

    AOG said:

    Just imagine the outrage of rats when Trump didn't sue every single msm outlet that falsely accused Trump of colluding with the Russians.

    I guess with the socialists, as history has taught us, there is only one side of justice and that is the side of the bad guy rats.

    We've been through this countless times... "collusion" is not a legal term. You can't convict someone of collusion, which was never investigated and means nothing in a legal sense. They did not find conspiracy which is a crime. Trump gladly welcomed the help of Putin.
    And this dumbfuck has a problem with FoxNews
    Careful Race, you might get too excited and those dentures will loosen up and come out
    Borrowing @HHusky's Mom Humor, I see.

    How are things at the Beauty Parlor, Gladys?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited April 2023
    AOG said:

    Russia started due to a guy in the Trump campaign drinking and blabbing that they had access to the hack

    What was his name again? Are you talking about the “guy” who was reported by an Australian diplomat to have boasted about it? It was George Papadopoulos.

    Newsflash, the spying on Trump campaign staffers by an FBI/CIA asset began before that episode. But you go ahead and pretend it all began with the drunken boast. That’s the story dipshits were fed.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    Just imagine the outrage of rats when Trump didn't sue every single msm outlet that falsely accused Trump of colluding with the Russians.

    I guess with the socialists, as history has taught us, there is only one side of justice and that is the side of the bad guy rats.

    Trump gladly welcomed the help of Putin.
    Link?
    The report of Mueller:

    "the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts."
    Still buying the Russia collusion hoax huh? All paid for by Hillary and the communist party usa!
    What part of this sentence is an indication of a hoax? the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.

    A hoax would be if they did not repeatedly interact with Russian operatives (in the report, read it!) and did not expect to benefit from Russia.

    Just saying "hoax" does not make it so. That is known as a including the conclusion of your argument in your rhetoric trying to conclude, ie., is called the "begging the question" fallacy, circular argumentation.
    Crowdstrike's CEO said there was no evidence of "exfiltration" of emails, you idiot.

    There was, however, a dead 27 year old Dem campaign staffer, executed at 4 a.m. in DC, who's corpse was missing a thumb drive full of HRC's emails.