Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Florida passes 6 week abortion plan

1…89111314…18

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    TurdBomber said:

    RaceBannon said:

    My mom said when of sound mind that she wanted us to kill her if she went bad

    Instead she got 5 to 10 of dementia because she was so healthy

    At that point she isn't of sound mind

    My Mom and Dad's entire estate is being devoured at 12.5k per month in a memory care hellhole where everyone is drugged to sleep all day.

    I've given strict instructions to my wife and kids to never, ever let that happen to me.

    Drop me in the Cascades with a gallon of whiskey and call it a life.
    Never too early to start.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    Didn't they make a pill that solves this problem?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    RaceBannon said:

    My mom said when of sound mind that she wanted us to kill her if she went bad

    Instead she got 5 to 10 of dementia because she was so healthy

    At that point she isn't of sound mind

    My Mom and Dad's entire estate is being devoured at 12.5k per month in a memory care hellhole where everyone is drugged to sleep all day.

    I've given strict instructions to my wife and kids to never, ever let that happen to me.

    Drop me in the Cascades with a gallon of whiskey and call it a life.
    Never too early to start.
    Anything to censor your critics when you can't compete.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    TurdBomber said:

    RaceBannon said:

    My mom said when of sound mind that she wanted us to kill her if she went bad

    Instead she got 5 to 10 of dementia because she was so healthy

    At that point she isn't of sound mind

    My Mom and Dad's entire estate is being devoured at 12.5k per month in a memory care hellhole where everyone is drugged to sleep all day.

    I've given strict instructions to my wife and kids to never, ever let that happen to me.

    Drop me in the Cascades with a gallon of whiskey and call it a life.
    I've given my wife the pillow go ahead. Just make sure to do it right to avoid the broken vessels in the eyes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Blueduck
    Blueduck Member Posts: 1,669 Standard Supporter
    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    thechatch said:

    I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

    I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

    For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

    The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

    Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

    Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life.

    Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

    Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.
    You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.
    Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

    If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

    I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.
    True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

    Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.
    At least 50% of women will never, ever go there. Maybe even 70%.
    Political reality doesn't change the moral equation. God knows our politics are anything but an exercise in true moral thinking.
    Agreed. But politics poison all morality. Better to keep them separate, as often as possible.

    Otherwise you get Got Hates Fags on one side and God Loves Trannies on the other.

    Enough to cause any rational person to avert their attention and not look again.

    Fwiw...
    I just want to point out that separation of church and state was originally meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
    Our founding fathers invoked God several times in our Constitution because they believed that the church was supposed to be a moral compass for the state.
    I would like to say that, for the majority of the history of this country we have had leaders who drew upon their religious beliefs but the Politicians and lawyers have argued and corrupted everything along the way to the point of expelling the church's morality stumbling block for compromise on issues to get something instead of nothing..

    We were also warned by our forefathers not to elect a bunch of lawyers to run the country, and look at what we have.

    We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    I would argue to bring morality back to the front, not keep it separate.

    My $0.02



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,527 Standard Supporter
    Blueduck said:

    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    thechatch said:

    I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

    I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

    For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

    The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

    Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

    Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life.

    Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

    Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.
    You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.
    Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

    If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

    I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.
    True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

    Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.
    At least 50% of women will never, ever go there. Maybe even 70%.
    Political reality doesn't change the moral equation. God knows our politics are anything but an exercise in true moral thinking.
    Agreed. But politics poison all morality. Better to keep them separate, as often as possible.

    Otherwise you get Got Hates Fags on one side and God Loves Trannies on the other.

    Enough to cause any rational person to avert their attention and not look again.

    Fwiw...
    I just want to point out that separation of church and state was originally meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
    Our founding fathers invoked God several times in our Constitution because they believed that the church was supposed to be a moral compass for the state.
    I would like to say that, for the majority of the history of this country we have had leaders who drew upon their religious beliefs but the Politicians and lawyers have argued and corrupted everything along the way to the point of expelling the church's morality stumbling block for compromise on issues to get something instead of nothing..

    We were also warned by our forefathers not to elect a bunch of lawyers to run the country, and look at what we have.

    We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    I would argue to bring morality back to the front, not keep it separate.

    My $0.02



    Shakespeare said let's just kill all the lawyers.

    That might be a good concept to consider.

    Test it out on the pretend lawyer Dazzler first.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Blueduck said:

    l
    Fwiw...
    I just want to point out that separation of church and state was originally meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
    Our founding fathers invoked God several times in our Constitution because they believed that the church was supposed to be a moral compass for the state.
    I would like to say that, for the majority of the history of this country we have had leaders who drew upon their religious beliefs but the Politicians and lawyers have argued and corrupted everything along the way to the point of expelling the church's morality stumbling block for compromise on issues to get something instead of nothing..

    We were also warned by our forefathers not to elect a bunch of lawyers to run the country, and look at what we have.

    We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    I would argue to bring morality back to the front, not keep it separate.

    My $0.02

    Whose Morality? Should I stone my kids to death for pre-marital sex?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Blueduck
    Blueduck Member Posts: 1,669 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023
    TurdBomber said:

    Blueduck said:

    l
    Fwiw...
    I just want to point out that separation of church and state was originally meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
    Our founding fathers invoked God several times in our Constitution because they believed that the church was supposed to be a moral compass for the state.
    I would like to say that, for the majority of the history of this country we have had leaders who drew upon their religious beliefs but the Politicians and lawyers have argued and corrupted everything along the way to the point of expelling the church's morality stumbling block for compromise on issues to get something instead of nothing..

    We were also warned by our forefathers not to elect a bunch of lawyers to run the country, and look at what we have.

    We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    I would argue to bring morality back to the front, not keep it separate.

    My $0.02

    Whose Morality? Should I stone my kids to death for pre-marital sex?
    For children morality starts with the parents. If you don't lead by example and teach them that there are consequences for their actions and then follow through then they will not learn.
    Stoning is a little harsh...but
    Abortion is just consequences for the baby not the premarital sex.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Blueduck said:

    TurdBomber said:

    Blueduck said:

    l
    Fwiw...
    I just want to point out that separation of church and state was originally meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.
    Our founding fathers invoked God several times in our Constitution because they believed that the church was supposed to be a moral compass for the state.
    I would like to say that, for the majority of the history of this country we have had leaders who drew upon their religious beliefs but the Politicians and lawyers have argued and corrupted everything along the way to the point of expelling the church's morality stumbling block for compromise on issues to get something instead of nothing..

    We were also warned by our forefathers not to elect a bunch of lawyers to run the country, and look at what we have.

    We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    I would argue to bring morality back to the front, not keep it separate.

    My $0.02

    Whose Morality? Should I stone my kids to death for pre-marital sex?
    For children morality starts with the parents. If you don't lead by example and teach them that there are consequences for their actions and then follow through then they will not learn.
    Stoning is a little harsh...but
    Abortion is just consequences for the baby not the premarital sex.

    Do not tie religion and government together, in any way, shape or form, or your lineage will live to regret it.

    America exists as a beacon of religious freedom - from Government.

    You wrote: We are where we are because the church and morality have been removed from all political discussion.

    You're half right: Morality, yes. Church or Religion, No. 100% Wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter