Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
The other side will have the same weapons. The winning side will be the one that kills enough of their enemy so they quit, same as it ever was. It's better to be on the winning side. Mankind has gone to war because they think they can win. Sometimes they do - Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, the Romans, the English and sometimes they don't - Napoleon, Hitler, Imperial Japan and the US since World War II.
-
Sky Net is the end of humanity
-
The earth’s landmass is for all intents and purposes finite and who controls what percentage of it has existed in all of human history. Why Russia taking small regions of Ukraine at massive losses of life is supposedly so important for global safety has to be tied to the finances of those in power in the West. In reality, so what? The Soviet empire ended up being a paper tiger and it was better-funded financially and more strategic geographically than this little border skirmish today’s Russia isn’t at all dominating.
Russian tanks aren’t rolling into Warsaw anytime soon, warmongers.
-
Sounds like it's a good thing they are all killing each other still then.
-
Everything is going to plan. ROI’s and shredding’s are through the roof. Victory is in site.
-
I mean even the Russian propagandists are criticizing what it cost them to take Avdivka. (You know, that tiny town on the existing border that took them years to take)
The Kremlin is responding by killing anyone that says it but still.
This has completely devolved to WW1 trench attrition warfare. Should do wonders for Russian ambitions to dominate in a new multipolar world.
That was the sound of another irreplaceable AWAC crashing.
-
Yes, as I’ve said repeatedly, the Russian army getting decimated by struggling to beat a bunch of middle-aged Ukrainians shows how ridiculous the notion is that they will soon be getting the old Soviet gang back together. It’s an illogical argument. Russian tanks aren’t going to be rolling into Warsaw. There are some legitimate reasons to fund Ukraine, but those saying it’s to prevent the comeback of the Soviet Union are doing so either to fool dumb people, or they are idiots themselves who do not understand why NATO exists.
I may even argue that more aggressive military actions by the West against Russia in Ukraine will make China more willing to fully support Moscow if things escalate in non-NATO Ukraine.
-
I know you have openly a different perspective, which is to have a long bloody stalemate and don't give a fuck about the save democracy narrative in Ukraine (I'm with you on the last part). But Americans like wars that we are on the winning side of. This thing was always going to collapse quickly once the narrative of Ukraine actually winning was shown to have always been a pipe dream. This whole thing has been humiliating.
-
You are welcome to find where I've ever made those arguments.
The current Russian regime is intent on the overthrow of the Western world order and the US system. In no realistic scenario were they doing that by putting the Warsaw pact back on the map.
Look around at how the demoralization progrum campaign is going though.
-
If the intent is to overthrow the west Biden is doing his part by keeping the money flowing to Russia and cementing the Russia China alliance against the west. Selling them the rope to hang us as Lenin put it
From day 1 i said if you have Vindman, Obama, Romney and the EU on your side youre on the wrong fucking side
It is a humiliation
