Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that. -
Have you been reading my stuff or not? That's 100% not the actual objective.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that. -
Why does the US want one of it's major enemies to have a settled peace instead of a bloody meat grinding stalemate they can't escape from?WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
You guysm switch between "Ukrainians are Nazis!" And "We need peace to save lives!" So fast I can't keep up. -
It may not be the objective in reality, but it's the objective that has been sold to the public.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Have you been reading my stuff or not? That's 100% not the actual objective.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that. -
Because the Ukraine isn't a priority over our southern border. Why are you and PGOS so concerned about a much more minor threat to us than either the chicoms or are internal open border enemies? America World Police hasn't worked out worth a damn since a draw in Korea because a strong American president (Ike) scared the sh*t out of Russia and particularly China. Why take the draw and leave Russia and China with control of North Korea? If keeping European Ukraine out of the hands of the Russians is important, let the Euros deal with it. When your team declares whatever it takes for however long it takes and the stated goal is to remove a nuclear power from all of the Ukraine including the Crimea I want something a little more specific. Our team hasn't switched. Our team could have saved lives and the Ukrainians are not democrats and do have lots of Nazis. The Russians are not democrats and have lots of commies. Your team is the one that told us it was about "democracy".
-
Why specifically are they a major enemy?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why does the US want one of it's major enemies to have a settled peace instead of a bloody meat grinding stalemate they can't escape from?WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
You guysm switch between "Ukrainians are Nazis!" And "We need peace to save lives!" So fast I can't keep up. -
That's my point. Our two biggest enemies are the chicoms and the dems and their allies. Russia currently threaten our public education system? They involved with fentanyl and human trafficking and turning the US into the world's biggest welfare magnet?Bob_C said:
Why specifically are they a major enemy?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why does the US want one of it's major enemies to have a settled peace instead of a bloody meat grinding stalemate they can't escape from?WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
You guysm switch between "Ukrainians are Nazis!" And "We need peace to save lives!" So fast I can't keep up. -
I was hoping Ukraine would be able to do more on the offensive, but this war has literally been a trench lined shitshow with no gains by either side for a year.WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
Its time to hang up the cleats. Russia gets the shit they managed to grab. Ukraine joins NATO and ensures this doesnt occur again
With any luck Putin dies soon and Russians form a real government.
History says they don't, but one can hope.
No one wants Russia to be an enemy. I love Russian food, they have an interesting country and culture, hot women. Would like to visit.
They make themselves an enemy for no reason. -
Russia isn't taking that deal. They want no NATO in Ukraine and have been telling you that for years before this war.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I was hoping Ukraine would be able to do more on the offensive, but this war has literally been a trench lined shitshow with no gains by either side for a year.WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
Its time to hang up the cleats. Russia gets the shit they managed to grab. Ukraine joins NATO and ensures this doesnt occur again
With any luck Putin dies soon and Russians form a real government.
History says they don't, but one can hope.
No one wants Russia to be an enemy. I love Russian food, they have an interesting country and culture, hot women. Would like to visit.
They make themselves an enemy for no reason. -
They didnt want NATO in Sweden and Finland, or the Baltics, either. And here we are.Bob_C said:
Russia isn't taking that deal. They want no NATO in Ukraine and have been telling you that for years before this war.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I was hoping Ukraine would be able to do more on the offensive, but this war has literally been a trench lined shitshow with no gains by either side for a year.WestlinnDuck said:
We argued a settlement conceding territory that Russia had in possession plus no Ukraine in NATO. PGOS was arguing spring offensive and getting Russia out of the Ukraine. We could have had a deal before the new Russian invasion but our MIC and our eternal warriors in both parties voted for war. Meanwhile, the chicoms and Cho Bai Den smile.Bob_C said:
Unable to achieve its stated objectives of getting Russia out of Ukraine is not a W.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For Ukrainians? Maybe, maybe not, depends on how you look at it.TurdBomber said:
YouPostGameOrangeSlices said:
It wasnt a lost causeTurdBomber said:
So are you finally done pumping that money-laundering, lost-cause, corrupt war?PostGameOrangeSlices said:No one cares about this stalemate any more
Ukraine still exists with 75% of their land under their control
Russia was exposed as a circus, and the US got incredible intel watching them go full WW1 in embarassing fashion
Seems like a W for the USAmay beare clearly and unequivocally the dumbest person on these boreds.
Losing 25% of a nation's land is a victory in your childish mind.
Keep wearing that helmet, Retard.
For Russia? Massive L.
For the US at a geopolitical and strategic level? Unequivocally a massive W.
Probably deterred the invasion of Taiwan if nothing else.
Definitely revitalized NATO at an existential level which "isn't" important until it is.
I could list, and already did for our regular readers, at least 10 ways in which it is for the US.
None of that means there shouldn't be better oversight, transparency, and accountability in the US military industrial complex. It's possible to be for both even though some in the Tug can't seem to fathom that.
Its time to hang up the cleats. Russia gets the shit they managed to grab. Ukraine joins NATO and ensures this doesnt occur again
With any luck Putin dies soon and Russians form a real government.
History says they don't, but one can hope.
No one wants Russia to be an enemy. I love Russian food, they have an interesting country and culture, hot women. Would like to visit.
They make themselves an enemy for no reason.
This war isnt about NATO. It's about being stuck in a medieval mindset where countries conquer each other for land.
Not even Khazakstan likes Russia anymore. Friendless in their sphere of influence.
