Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
Not one person on this bored gives a shit about the Russian narrative. Grow up and understand the two positions do not have to be interlinked.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The gullible fall for the Russian narrativeRaceBannon said:Democrats have tied the spending resolution to defending democracy in Ukraine
Zelitski is going the DC to pimp it
The gullible fall for it
Hi PGOS!
Hth -
This is just wrong. Go reread the first 100 pagesRoadTrip said:
Not one person on this bored gives a shit about the Russian narrative. Grow up and understand the two positions do not have to be interlinked.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The gullible fall for the Russian narrativeRaceBannon said:Democrats have tied the spending resolution to defending democracy in Ukraine
Zelitski is going the DC to pimp it
The gullible fall for it
Hi PGOS!
Hth -
Then name names of who supoorts the Russian narrative. I don't support what they're doing but you'll continue to say I'm a pawn of the Kremlin anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is just wrong. Go reread the first 100 pagesRoadTrip said:
Not one person on this bored gives a shit about the Russian narrative. Grow up and understand the two positions do not have to be interlinked.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The gullible fall for the Russian narrativeRaceBannon said:Democrats have tied the spending resolution to defending democracy in Ukraine
Zelitski is going the DC to pimp it
The gullible fall for it
Hi PGOS!
Hth -
Page one pretty much sums up everything really.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is just wrong. Go reread the first 100 pagesRoadTrip said:
Not one person on this bored gives a shit about the Russian narrative. Grow up and understand the two positions do not have to be interlinked.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The gullible fall for the Russian narrativeRaceBannon said:Democrats have tied the spending resolution to defending democracy in Ukraine
Zelitski is going the DC to pimp it
The gullible fall for it
Hi PGOS!
Hth -
Kherson was stalled until it wasn't. Russians use reserves and rails to stabilize the lines. Once one of those breaks massive gains can happen. If Ukraine takes Tokmak, or even just establishes fire control over it, it will cut the rail link to all of the Western front and Crimea.Bob_C said:
Yeah, Russia stalled out for sure last year. Now Ukraine is the one throwing huge losses into offensives that won't move the needle. Ukraine isn't capable of winning by their own definitions or their US handler's definitions (which as of this week are the same).UW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:It looks huge when the military industrial complex zooms in and tweets about it though.
Fun with maps? You mean like only showing gains since June or so?
I'm hearing the Kherson offensive is stalled out and not going anywhere as well.
Not saying it WILL happen don't twist. Pretty obvious this is now the Ukrainian strategy though. -
It won't but even if it did Russia dying on this hill literally will be a win for the world including the U-S-A.RaceBannon said:This war will stalemate at a point that could have been negotiated a few hundred thousand dead ago
Cook it
I think only way that happens is if Trump gets elected and forces UKR to accept terms.
Then the Russians will just wait for the next Democrat to be elected for the next invasion. -
I agree it’s the strategy. No indication that it will work so far. I guess it could under perfect circumstances. The Offensive clearly has underachieved relative to the hype. PGOS was hyping the September spring offensive in February. Reality is that Russia far better at this long grind it out war and my money is on them to achieve whatever objections they have (still unclear what those are)UW_Doog_Bot said:
Kherson was stalled until it wasn't. Russians use reserves and rails to stabilize the lines. Once one of those breaks massive gains can happen. If Ukraine takes Tokmak, or even just establishes fire control over it, it will cut the rail link to all of the Western front and Crimea.Bob_C said:
Yeah, Russia stalled out for sure last year. Now Ukraine is the one throwing huge losses into offensives that won't move the needle. Ukraine isn't capable of winning by their own definitions or their US handler's definitions (which as of this week are the same).UW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:It looks huge when the military industrial complex zooms in and tweets about it though.
Fun with maps? You mean like only showing gains since June or so?
I'm hearing the Kherson offensive is stalled out and not going anywhere as well.
Not saying it WILL happen don't twist. Pretty obvious this is now the Ukrainian strategy though.
The comp on this war is becoming Iran Iraq from the 80’s. Two terrible countries fighting, US backs one horrible dictator against another. Didn’t care who won that one either. Just feel bad for the dead on both sides that fought over nothing. -
The offensive hasnt delivered the desired results thus far. But neither did the last two...until they did.Bob_C said:
I agree it’s the strategy. No indication that it will work so far. I guess it could under perfect circumstances. The Offensive clearly has underachieved relative to the hype. PGOS was hyping the September spring offensive in February. Reality is that Russia far better at this long grind it out war and my money is on them to achieve whatever objections they have (still unclear what those are)UW_Doog_Bot said:
Kherson was stalled until it wasn't. Russians use reserves and rails to stabilize the lines. Once one of those breaks massive gains can happen. If Ukraine takes Tokmak, or even just establishes fire control over it, it will cut the rail link to all of the Western front and Crimea.Bob_C said:
Yeah, Russia stalled out for sure last year. Now Ukraine is the one throwing huge losses into offensives that won't move the needle. Ukraine isn't capable of winning by their own definitions or their US handler's definitions (which as of this week are the same).UW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:It looks huge when the military industrial complex zooms in and tweets about it though.
Fun with maps? You mean like only showing gains since June or so?
I'm hearing the Kherson offensive is stalled out and not going anywhere as well.
Not saying it WILL happen don't twist. Pretty obvious this is now the Ukrainian strategy though.
The comp on this war is becoming Iran Iraq from the 80’s. Two terrible countries fighting, US backs one horrible dictator against another. Didn’t care who won that one either. Just feel bad for the dead on both sides that fought over nothing.
The front can collapse at any point in time almost instantly. All accounts are that Russia is losing a large number more artillery than Ukraine is. But Russia has massive reserves and decent industry for artillery.
Russia is also losing premier assets like T90 tanks and KA52 helicopters at an alarming rate.
Russia cannot operate its air force near the front line due to budget rate Western AA. They dont even try to use SU35s anymore because its not worth it.
Its a drone fest nightmare on both sides in farmland with barely any tree coverage.
Despite these challenges Ukraine is slowly grinding forward towards Tokmak. They are getting Abrams tanks and F16s soon.
LIFPO. -
Please to be defining 'soon'.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The offensive hasnt delivered the desired results thus far. But neither did the last two...until they did.Bob_C said:
I agree it’s the strategy. No indication that it will work so far. I guess it could under perfect circumstances. The Offensive clearly has underachieved relative to the hype. PGOS was hyping the September spring offensive in February. Reality is that Russia far better at this long grind it out war and my money is on them to achieve whatever objections they have (still unclear what those are)UW_Doog_Bot said:
Kherson was stalled until it wasn't. Russians use reserves and rails to stabilize the lines. Once one of those breaks massive gains can happen. If Ukraine takes Tokmak, or even just establishes fire control over it, it will cut the rail link to all of the Western front and Crimea.Bob_C said:
Yeah, Russia stalled out for sure last year. Now Ukraine is the one throwing huge losses into offensives that won't move the needle. Ukraine isn't capable of winning by their own definitions or their US handler's definitions (which as of this week are the same).UW_Doog_Bot said:Bob_C said:It looks huge when the military industrial complex zooms in and tweets about it though.
Fun with maps? You mean like only showing gains since June or so?
I'm hearing the Kherson offensive is stalled out and not going anywhere as well.
Not saying it WILL happen don't twist. Pretty obvious this is now the Ukrainian strategy though.
The comp on this war is becoming Iran Iraq from the 80’s. Two terrible countries fighting, US backs one horrible dictator against another. Didn’t care who won that one either. Just feel bad for the dead on both sides that fought over nothing.
The front can collapse at any point in time almost instantly. All accounts are that Russia is losing a large number more artillery than Ukraine is. But Russia has massive reserves and decent industry for artillery.
Russia is also losing premier assets like T90 tanks and KA52 helicopters at an alarming rate.
Russia cannot operate its air force near the front line due to budget rate Western AA. They dont even try to use SU35s anymore because its not worth it.
Its a drone fest nightmare on both sides in farmland with barely any tree coverage.
Despite these challenges Ukraine is slowly grinding forward towards Tokmak. They are getting Abrams tanks and F16s soon.
LIFPO.
1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years?
How many do they actually need? How many will they actually get?
What material difference will it make to effect an actual change in the landscape?
-
I think a lot of you aren't taking into account the emotion on the field
A lot of the progress isn't showing up on the scoreboard
Zelitski needs more tim
