Negative GDP print for Q1

HFNY

Maybe it's because of the fucktards in the Oval Office and Fed?

reason.com/archives/2014/05/25/keynesian-economics-forever

QuornDawg

I think some of these fucktards contribute to the #fuckingdreckfest as well

MikeDamone

None of you Fucktards will read this, but you should at least know it exists.

mises.org/books/failureofneweconomics.pdf

sarktastic

Economic activity was down because it snowed in the winter... duh.

AZDuck

HFNY

I would agree with you if you mean defense spending and social issues (limited government doesn't just extend to the fiscal / monetary side).

Keynesian policies give cover to Big Government types who want to buy votes by monetizing the debt and leveraging the US Treasury.

monroecougdad said:

I think some of these fucktards contribute to the #fuckingdreckfest as well

HFNY

BRB, JO

MikeDamone said:

None of you Fucktards will read this, but you should at least know it exists.

mises.org/books/failureofneweconomics.pdf

HFNY

Cute and simple but not accurate. Anarchists don't want any governance while Libertarians agree to it but only if it is limited and more local rather than Federal.

I don't know if I'd consider myself a Libertarian or what (not a Republican or a Democrat) but that whole powers not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the States thingy matters.

AZDuck said:

QuornDawg

MikeDamone said:

None of you Fucktards will read this, but you should at least know it exists.

mises.org/books/failureofneweconomics.pdf

TL, NP, DR

AZDuck

Kropotkin:

[Anarchism] seeks the most complete development of individuality combined with the highest development of voluntary association in all its aspects, in all possible degrees, for all imaginable aims; ever changing, ever modified associations which carry in themselves the elements of their durability and constantly assume new forms, which answer best to the multiple aspirations of all.

http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/philandideal.html

HFNY said:

Cute and simple but not accurate. Anarchists don't want any governance while Libertarians agree to it but only if it is limited and more local rather than Federal.

I don't know if I'd consider myself a Libertarian or what (not a Republican or a Democrat) but that whole powers not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the States thingy matters.

AZDuck said:

GrundleStiltzkin

AZDuck said:

Kropotkin:

[Anarchism] seeks the most complete development of individuality combined with the highest development of voluntary association in all its aspects, in all possible degrees, for all imaginable aims; ever changing, ever modified associations which carry in themselves the elements of their durability and constantly assume new forms, which answer best to the multiple aspirations of all.

http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/philandideal.html