Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kam Chancellor #65 on NFL top 100 players of 2014

CuntWaffle
CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
in NFL Talk
Hooks are going nuts. I dont think it is horrible... But 65th for the best player in the playoffs for the team that just won the Super Bowl seems a little low.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    I'm okay with it. I haven't been following the list but I'm assuming Sherman, Wilson, Lynch and Thomas haven't been listed yet? Five in the top 65 seems like plenty of respect.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GulagDawg
    GulagDawg Member Posts: 200
    That's what you get for spelling Cam with a K.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Not to go all Hook on you guys but I think 65 is a little low for Kam. He proved he was one of the best defensive players in the league this past year.

    Like you said on a team with Wilson, Sherman, Lynch, Thomas it was Chancellor who was by far and away the best player on the team in the postseason. That has to count for something.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    It's a silly list so WGAF but Troy Polamalu is not a better safety than chancellor right now.
    OTOH you can find a gazillion mistakes on the list so it isn't worth worrying about, such as tyron smith below Staley, Peters, Ossai, etc
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • QuornDawg
    QuornDawg Member Posts: 1,162
    I'm guessing this pole didn't have the input of Demaryius Thomas
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    monroecougdad said:

    I'm guessing this pole didn't have the input of Vernon Davis

    FTFY
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • QuornDawg
    QuornDawg Member Posts: 1,162
    edited May 2014
    I'm guessing this pole didn't have the input of Vernon Davis or Demaryius Thomas

    FTFY

    abundance
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,148
    65th is pretty fucking good. 32 teams in the NFL, that means Kam is rated as a team's 2nd or 3rd best player. That seems about right to me. He's a fucking beast though and played great in the playoffs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    I'm assuming the NFL Top 100 Players list is about as legit as the Pro Bowl and All Pro selections.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    all pro selections are more legitimate than this crap.

    Seahooks.net is whining about how the niners have 10 players, broncos 9 and seahawks only 5. As ridiculous as I think that is it really isn't even worth complaining about "lack of respect" over.
    next
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I think the Seahawks only deserve 5 truthfully. I mean Unger and Okung who could have had a chance were hurt last year. Bennett and Avril are good players but not top 100 material.

    I bet Seattle has four top 50 players though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    yes but does denver really have 9? San Fransisco 10? Outside of Peyton that roster really is pretty pedestrian. Point it it's a very subjective and flawed list
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    I would say Mebane, Bennett, and Wagner should at least be in the conversation
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I think the Seahawks only deserve 5 truthfully. I mean Unger and Okung who could have had a chance were hurt last year. Bennett and Avril are good players but not top 100 material.

    I bet Seattle has four top 50 players though.

    You don't think Bennett deserves to be there? I would probably put Mebane in the top 100 also, but no question I'd put Bennett. Profootballfocus had Bennett at 16. That's higher than I'd put him, but I think he's definitely top 50.

    FWIW, here's where PFF had the Seahawks in their top 100 players of 2013 (compiled after the playoffs):

    6 - Sherman
    10 - Lynch
    16 - Bennett
    20 - Thomas
    28 - Chancellor
    48 - Wilson (#3 QB)
    56 - Mebane
    94 - Avril
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I think the Seahawks only deserve 5 truthfully. I mean Unger and Okung who could have had a chance were hurt last year. Bennett and Avril are good players but not top 100 material.

    I bet Seattle has four top 50 players though.

    You don't think Bennett deserves to be there? I would probably put Mebane in the top 100 also, but no question I'd put Bennett. Profootballfocus had Bennett at 16. That's higher than I'd put him, but I think he's definitely top 50.

    FWIW, here's where PFF had the Seahawks in their top 100 players of 2013 (compiled after the playoffs):

    6 - Sherman
    10 - Lynch
    16 - Bennett
    20 - Thomas
    28 - Chancellor
    48 - Wilson (#3 QB)
    56 - Mebane
    94 - Avril
    Wilson as the #3 QB is massively overrating him.

    I like this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I think the Seahawks only deserve 5 truthfully. I mean Unger and Okung who could have had a chance were hurt last year. Bennett and Avril are good players but not top 100 material.

    I bet Seattle has four top 50 players though.

    You don't think Bennett deserves to be there? I would probably put Mebane in the top 100 also, but no question I'd put Bennett. Profootballfocus had Bennett at 16. That's higher than I'd put him, but I think he's definitely top 50.

    FWIW, here's where PFF had the Seahawks in their top 100 players of 2013 (compiled after the playoffs):

    6 - Sherman
    10 - Lynch
    16 - Bennett
    20 - Thomas
    28 - Chancellor
    48 - Wilson (#3 QB)
    56 - Mebane
    94 - Avril
    Wilson as the #3 QB is massively overrating him.

    I like this.
    I tend to agree. I think he's either #5 or #6 behind Manning, Rodgers, Brees and Brady, and I could see Wilson vs Luck go either way.

    They gave Wilson a lot of credit for playing behind a shitty offensive line, which is at least semi defensible.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    dnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I think the Seahawks only deserve 5 truthfully. I mean Unger and Okung who could have had a chance were hurt last year. Bennett and Avril are good players but not top 100 material.

    I bet Seattle has four top 50 players though.

    You don't think Bennett deserves to be there? I would probably put Mebane in the top 100 also, but no question I'd put Bennett. Profootballfocus had Bennett at 16. That's higher than I'd put him, but I think he's definitely top 50.

    FWIW, here's where PFF had the Seahawks in their top 100 players of 2013 (compiled after the playoffs):

    6 - Sherman
    10 - Lynch
    16 - Bennett
    20 - Thomas
    28 - Chancellor
    48 - Wilson (#3 QB)
    56 - Mebane
    94 - Avril
    Agree. Bennett was better than Jared Allen last year, and Allen was in the 60's in this NFL top 100 list. Granted, a lot of linemen were better than Allen last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter