Unhinged Liberal Who KILLED Republican Teenager FREED, GOP Is Doing NOTHING As Terrorist Walks Free
Comments
-
I didn't think it was possible but this "take" by the Dazzler might have even topped his claim that because the city of Ferguson settled with the Gentle Giant's family, therefore that proves he really was shot in the back, with his arms in the air, while on his knees, running away.
-
As Race says, they "Defend everything". That's the mantra of the religiously fanatic left. Lie and obfuscate about everything. It worked in the past and they will keep running that play until defeated and discredited. Now there is also the McConnel/McCarthy playbook, "Defend nothing".thechatch said:HH why are you choosing this hill on which to die?
-
Only the Dazzler can defend shit this obvious. Clueless commie shills keep shilling.
-
Exposing you girls falling for a drunk's story because you find it politically useful is not the same as me dying.thechatch said:HH why are you choosing this hill on which to die?
-
Page 8
-
You trying to change the story because you find it politically useful is you choosing to die on a hill, GladysHHusky said:
Exposing you girls falling for a drunk's story because you find it politically useful is not the same as me dying.thechatch said:HH why are you choosing this hill on which to die?
-
all liberals are unhinged imo
-
It's a better defense than anything you could mount, #shittylawyerwhocan'tgethisfactsstraight.HHusky said:As per usual:
https://www.inforum.com/news/north-dakota/trooper-no-evidence-north-dakota-teen-was-republican-extremist-called-others-to-get-driver-in-fatal-crash
The facts of the case so far do not support Brandt’s claims that he and Ellingson argued about politics or that the teenager was calling for people to come after Brandt, North Dakota Highway Patrol Capt. Bryan Niewind told The Forum on Thursday.
Imagine taking a drunk suspect's word for everything.
#Outrage! -
Some might call this a "takedown."MikeDamone said:
Except for the person who ran him over said he did so because he thought he was part of a republican extremist group.HHusky said:
To no one's surprise, you did not.MikeDamone said:
So the story is the person who ran over and killed the guy on purpose said he thought the person he killed was a republican extremist and was going to get friends to come after him. So he killed him with his car. Upon investigation, it appears the person killed was not a republican extremist nor was going to get friends to go after the guy. In Herr Dazzler mind this means the guy was not killed because he was an republican extremist, even though the suspect said he killed the guy because he thought he was a republican extremist and Dazzler is holding this up as "the media jumped to conclusions"RaceBannon said:
GaslightHHusky said:https://www.inforum.com/opinion/columns/port-cayler-ellingsons
In a better sort of world, where politicians and activists and social media rubberneckers were capable of a modicum of empathy and rational thought, we might have waited for facts that might support the conclusion before turning Ellingson's death into a political talking point. Sadly, we don't live in that world.
Did I get that right?
The facts of the case so far do not support Brandt’s claims that he and Ellingson argued about politics or that the teenager was calling for people to come after Brandt, North Dakota Highway Patrol Capt. Bryan Niewind told The Forum on Thursday.
The fact you think this is a "win" for you weird.
"I ran over this black guy because I hate blacks". Turns out the guy was Asian. Well ok then. He couldn't have been ran over because he's black since he's Asian. So fake news in Herr Dazzlers pea brain.
Also still waiting for the links an all the case law about equal application of the law you seemed to care about.
I'd call it a "floor-mopping." -
