Wow another pointless thread by this fucking loser where it has to be explained to him a 30th time why his stupid fucking opinion is just leftist faggot nonsense that belongs on a fucking political forum...
But with any proposed gun restrictions automatically being deemed "unconstitutional" by factions, I'm curious what self-proclaimed patriots think is "constitutional" regarding an amendment written when muskets fired once or twice followed by bayonet and close quarter physical fighting was the rule in 1791—not like when the Tucson killer expended over 30 rounds in a brief terrifying moment and received 19 charges of murder and attempted murder for the minimal effort of twitching his finger.
...
Lost me there. Rights are rights and immutable, not subject to the state of contemporary technology. The free press in 1791 was laboriously manually. It's doubtful the Framers could imagine a HP LaserJet turning out—automatically—a thousand pages in a day, much less the Internet. Yet the principal right protected, not granted, remains.
Serious questions.
Do you consider a background check on a private sale an infringement on your rights?
Do you consider the fact that felons can't legally by a guy an infringement on rights?
You can't be so stupid to not know those laws are already in place.
Did you get a background check to exercise your right to free speech before posting here?
What other constitutional rights have these same or similar requirements? Reported should maybe have background and regular lie detector tests to see if they are putting out fake news.
You bitch about voter ID.
George is paying you good money. Turn out something better.
Do you consider a background check on a private sale an infringement on your rights?
Do you consider the fact that felons can't legally by a guy an infringement on rights?
Yes I used the term assualt rifle as a generic term. I'm referring to high capacity guns that can do more damage than an average rifle. Most mass shooters are not skilled shooters and can't reload a weapon quickly like a trained military officer or cop.
Your density is stunning.
You ask for what we already have and which has not prevented any of the incidents in question. You use a term which is factually incorrect and stupid then back it up with more incorrect information. That's the problem in a nutshell. People who don't know shit trying to take the rights away from citizens who did nothing wrong.
Comments
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_31785817/100-plus-speak-boulder-city-council-considers-ban
Do you consider a background check on a private sale an infringement on your rights?
Do you consider the fact that felons can't legally by a guy an infringement on rights?
Yes I used the term assualt rifle as a generic term. I'm referring to high capacity guns that can do more damage than an average rifle. Most mass shooters are not skilled shooters and can't reload a weapon quickly like a trained military officer or cop.
Your density is stunning.
You ask for what we already have and which has not prevented any of the incidents in question. You use a term which is factually incorrect and stupid then back it up with more incorrect information. That's the problem in a nutshell. People who don't know shit trying to take the rights away from citizens who did nothing wrong.
Fuck off.