Willie Brown's concubine is a fighter.
Comments
-
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
There is so much to break down it took 1/4 of the book. I really don't want to rehash it all.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
"Robo-calls" only scratch the surface of the fraud that was going on.
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
But the lenders were knowingly making loans to people they knew couldn't afford it. "Liar-loans", thin-file credit reviews, ARMs and the false-promise of the ability to refi were but a small number of excuses used to to write more paper for banks to wrap into tranches and sell as an A-grade security.
There is no way a handful of isolated incidents could have created a global economic disaster. It was certainly endemic.
Read the book. It's a quick read.
-
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand. -
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.SFGbob said:
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
Come see Gaybob do his best Hondo in every thread.
He's not going to read anything. That would take time away from his sniveling cunt act. -
No you just quoted me and said:creepycoug said:
I didn't say you made the claim Kunt, though I'm sure you are sympathetic to those who do. Try and read better, and your debate skills will improve. Dumb dumb.SFGbob said:
Great, you don't believe a claim I never made. Good for you Kunt.creepycoug said:
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.SFGbob said:
You can read her entire announcement speech here where she states no less than 24 times that she is going to "fight" against and for various things.
But I have a question for the libs, how many of you actually believe this statement to be true?
For the people meant fighting for middle class families who had been defrauded by banks and were losing their homes by the millions in the Great Recession.
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
And is the concubine selling fear?
And another question, do Rats all believe in the one drop rule? Because I keep seeing these politicians who aren't even half black who call themselves "African American."
http://www.ktvu.com/news/transcript-kamala-harris-kicks-off-presidential-campaign-in-oakland
About as much as I believe we were being "invaded" by rogue Mexicans. Like you, there are emotional little girls out there who believe whatever they want to believe.
Try not to be such a dishonest Kunt. You were clearly trying to attribute to me claims and beliefs I never expressed you lying Kunt. -
Yes, if people made payments they wouldn't be forclosed on, that's true.
No further questions your honor. -
It was easy.SFGbob said:
Fine then it should be easy for you to find examples where banks foreclosed on owners who were current on their mortgages.Edwin_Bambino said:
Not true. In fact some banks foreclosed on active duty deployed soldiers in combat which is illegal. But you hate facts so whatever.SFGbob said:
Come on, that's a cop out. People weren't losing their homes who were current on their mortgages. If you could pay your mortgage what incentive to the did bank have in foreclosing on your property? So they could be forced to sell it and get back less than what was owed on the existing mortgage?pawz said:
Read the book.SFGbob said:
So they weren't actually delinquent and in foreclosure on their mortgages, and the bank defrauded them out of their homes anyway? I don't think that's in your book.pawz said:SFGbob said:
Do any of you really believe that "millions" of people lost their homes on account of being defrauded by banks?
Yes. Simple fact.
It's explained here by a former high-finance insider, in layman's terms.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine-ebook/dp/B003LSTK8G/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1548715046&sr=8-3&keywords=the+big+short
Don't take my word for it.
The whole "Robo-signing" dealt entirely with properties that were already in foreclosure.
Your "read the book" response shows me that even you know you have a weak hand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ctLEGrOmf4
-
Appears Pawz just cut your legs out from underneath you dumbfuck. Your pals are all here I'm one of them will console you with an ass tonguing.CirrhosisDawg said:
No. No need. It’s quite obvious you’re content to wallow incessantly in your ignorance.SFGbob said:
Ahhh the Hondo the stupid Kunt MO. It's my job to find the evidence to back up your fucking mouth.CirrhosisDawg said:
Of course you don’t see evidence. Because you are an imbecile. Keep looking retard.SFGbob said:
The reverse was the problem during the housing meltdown fucking retard.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc! When the financed value is significantly below market value. Fuck you are a retard.SFGbob said:
I don't think you're lying I just think there is more to the story than you either know or are revealing. I'm certain that there might be a handful of cases where what you described might have happened but they're outliers and not the norm.Edwin_Bambino said:Luckily Bob you don’t have to take my word for it, the settlements are all out there for the public to see at their own viewing pleasure. And frankly it would be a weird thing for me to lie about.
What incentive does a bank have to foreclose on a property where the payments are current?
And I'm still not seeing any evidence that these type of bank foreclosures were at all prominent. -
Agreed. The Throbber will never deny one's right to wood hit any individual with even a remote hint of celebrity.creepycoug said:
I'd hit it. Without a doubt. It's what separates us from women. We can hit that which we hate with terrible enthusiasm. Ask @PurpleThrobber . He'll tell you.TurdBuffer said:
Fine. I'm a mysogenist then. But that doesn't change the fact that Kamala has a face like a bloodhound and a grating, whiny voice that sounds like a starving cat. And look at those man hands. JFC.
And a Presidential Candidate definitely falls into that realm.
I"m thinking she was even halfway doable back in the day. Much like Pelosi's ample ta tas.
