Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump Directed His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project
insinceredawg
Member Posts: 5,117
in Tug Tavern
Can't wait for the but but but Hillary/Obama responses from the Trump dickriders
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/trump-russia-cohen-moscow-tower-mueller-investigation
President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.
Trump also supported a plan, set up by Cohen, to visit Russia during the presidential campaign, in order to personally meet President Vladimir Putin and jump-start the tower negotiations. “Make it happen,” the sources said Trump told Cohen.
And even as Trump told the public he had no business deals with Russia, the sources said Trump and his children Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. received regular, detailed updates about the real estate development from Cohen, whom they put in charge of the project.
Cohen pleaded guilty in November to lying about the deal in testimony and in a two-page statement to the Senate and House intelligence committees. Special counsel Robert Mueller noted that Cohen’s false claim that the project ended in January 2016 was an attempt to “minimize links between the Moscow Project and Individual 1” — widely understood to be Trump — “in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigations.”
Now the two sources have told BuzzFeed News that Cohen also told the special counsel that after the election, the president personally instructed him to lie — by claiming that negotiations ended months earlier than they actually did — in order to obscure Trump’s involvement.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/trump-russia-cohen-moscow-tower-mueller-investigation
President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.
Trump also supported a plan, set up by Cohen, to visit Russia during the presidential campaign, in order to personally meet President Vladimir Putin and jump-start the tower negotiations. “Make it happen,” the sources said Trump told Cohen.
And even as Trump told the public he had no business deals with Russia, the sources said Trump and his children Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. received regular, detailed updates about the real estate development from Cohen, whom they put in charge of the project.
Cohen pleaded guilty in November to lying about the deal in testimony and in a two-page statement to the Senate and House intelligence committees. Special counsel Robert Mueller noted that Cohen’s false claim that the project ended in January 2016 was an attempt to “minimize links between the Moscow Project and Individual 1” — widely understood to be Trump — “in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigations.”
Now the two sources have told BuzzFeed News that Cohen also told the special counsel that after the election, the president personally instructed him to lie — by claiming that negotiations ended months earlier than they actually did — in order to obscure Trump’s involvement.
Comments
-
this is it? Your smoking gun? Your proof Trump is Putin’s bitch? One fucking hotel?
-
Gurgle.sarktastic said:this is it? Your smoking gun? Your proof Trump is Putin’s bitch? One fucking hotel?
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left... -
Post more zero hedge articles.HoustonHusky said:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left... -
But her emails!
-
The country is about to witness an investigatory train wreck.
In one direction, special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation train is looking for any conceivable thing that President Donald Trump's presidential campaign team might have done wrong in 2016.
The oncoming train is slower but also larger. It involves congressional investigations, Department of Justice referrals and inspector general's reports — mostly focused on improper or illegal FBI and DOJ behavior during the 2016 election.
Why are the two now about to collide?
By charging former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI, Mueller emphasized that even the appearance of false testimony is felonious behavior.
If that is so, then the DOJ will likely have to charge former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe with perjury or related offenses. A report from the Office of the Inspector General indicates that McCabe lied at least four times to federal investigators.
Former FBI Director James Comey may also have lied to Congress when he testified that he had not written his report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal before interviewing Clinton. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan lied under oath to Congress on matters related to surveillance.
Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin likely lied when they told FBI investigators they had no idea that their then-boss, Hillary Clinton, was using an illegal private email server. Both had communicated with Clinton about it.
Mueller is said to be investigating whether Trump obstructed justice by requesting that Comey go easy on Flynn.
If so, then the DOJ will have to look at Comey himself and DOJ officials who obstructed a federal court. On at least four occasions, they were not honest about the deeply flawed Christopher Steele dossier being the source of information used in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Comey also has said that he predicated the nature of the Clinton email investigation on his assumptions about her chances of winning the presidency — another investigatory abuse.
The Mueller team is reportedly still looking into the possibility of election-cycle collusion with Russia by Trump officials.
That track will require Mueller's DOJ counterparts to look carefully at the Clinton campaign, which paid opposition researcher Steele, a British subject, for dirt on Trump that was produced through collusion with Russian sources.
Mueller is also said to be investigating whether Trump or his advisers broke laws concerning the release of confidential government information.
If so, the DOJ may have to indict Comey. He confessed to passing along confidential FBI memos to a friend for the expressed purpose of leaking their contents to the press.
High-ranking Obama administration officials may also be subject to indictments, given that they may have requested the “unmasking” of American citizens whose communications were intercepted during the surveillance of foreign parties and then leaked the names of those citizens to the press. Mueller's team apparently has assumed that Michael Cohen's status as Trump's personal attorney offers no protections under normal attorney-client privilege protocols.
If that is true, the DOJ will have to investigate why the FBI allowed Clinton aide Mills to pose as Clinton's attorney and thereby be shielded from providing testimony on what she knew about the email scandal involving her “client.” Investigators have swarmed Cohen's offices and residence, supposedly in fear that he might destroy pertinent records.
The FBI should probably then reopen the investigation into the Clinton email scandal, given that Clinton destroyed more than 30,000 emails, as well as computer hard drives -
Go ahead and downplay it all you want but this is clear obstruction of justice. The reason Mueller's investigation is taking so long is because they keep on uncovering more crimes.
-
Poor Dick Nixon. He must wonder how his crimes were ever a big deal.
-
insinceredawg said:
Go ahead and downplay it all you want but this is clear obstruction of justice. The reason Mueller's investigation is taking so long is because they keep on uncovering more crimes.
Yeah...Buzzfeed. Along with their "blockbuster" report by a guy who has a long history of making shite up (Karl Rove indicted, fake Enron emails, a proud alumnus of the truthout nutjob society), Buzzfeed other current top news stories literally are:
1) 19 Celebrity Instagrams you Probably Missed this Week
https://www.buzzfeed.com/morganmurrell/celebrity-instagrams-you-probably-missed-this-week-1-18-19
2) 21 Restrooms That Are Going To Make You Say, "Why Doesn't Every Restroom Have That?"
https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/restrooms-that-are-going-to-make-you-say-why-doesnt
3) 19 Old People Who — Bless Them — Are NOT Great With Technology
https://www.buzzfeed.com/farrahpenn/old-people-who-are-not-great-with-technology
4) 16 Honest Confessions From People In The Funeral Industry
https://www.buzzfeed.com/agh/confessions-funeral-home-workers-directors-job-mortician
5) 28 Small Things Under $20 That Will Truly Make A Difference In Your Day
https://www.buzzfeed.com/abbykass/small-things-under-20-dollars-that-will-make-a-big?origin=hpp
Admittedly, this is probably as hard-hitting as CNN and MSNBC in actual "news" value, but this is what the Left has now?
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are quite a pair...
-
Funny how you were all in on the Bezos national inquirer story.HoustonHusky said:insinceredawg said:Go ahead and downplay it all you want but this is clear obstruction of justice. The reason Mueller's investigation is taking so long is because they keep on uncovering more crimes.
Yeah...Buzzfeed. Along with their "blockbuster" report by a guy who has a long history of making shite up (Karl Rove indicted, fake Enron emails, a proud alumnus of the truthout nutjob society), Buzzfeed other current top news stories literally are:
1) 19 Celebrity Instagrams you Probably Missed this Week
https://www.buzzfeed.com/morganmurrell/celebrity-instagrams-you-probably-missed-this-week-1-18-19
2) 21 Restrooms That Are Going To Make You Say, "Why Doesn't Every Restroom Have That?"
https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/restrooms-that-are-going-to-make-you-say-why-doesnt
3) 19 Old People Who — Bless Them — Are NOT Great With Technology
https://www.buzzfeed.com/farrahpenn/old-people-who-are-not-great-with-technology
4) 16 Honest Confessions From People In The Funeral Industry
https://www.buzzfeed.com/agh/confessions-funeral-home-workers-directors-job-mortician
5) 28 Small Things Under $20 That Will Truly Make A Difference In Your Day
https://www.buzzfeed.com/abbykass/small-things-under-20-dollars-that-will-make-a-big?origin=hpp
Admittedly, this is probably as hard-hitting as CNN and MSNBC in actual "news" value, but this is what the Left has now?
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are quite a pair... -
but but but
-
What if Meuller and Trump are in on draining the swamp Together?
-
Plot twist. I like it!sarktastic said:What if Meuller and Trump are in on draining the swamp Together?
-
What if Mueller hits Pelosi with a steel chair and he and Trump embrace as the SOTU goes off the air?sarktastic said:What if Meuller and Trump are in on draining the swamp Together?
-
Trumps AG is besties with Meuller. Wives in bible study for years, together.insinceredawg said:
Plot twist. I like it!sarktastic said:What if Meuller and Trump are in on draining the swamp Together?
-
-
Per the Left, "You can look here but, you can't look over there".
How can there be justice when that is the measuring stick of right and wrong?
I'm sure one of you dumbfucks will attempt to deny that is happening. -
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH2001400ex said:
Funny how you were all in on the Bezos national inquirer story.HoustonHusky said:insinceredawg said:Go ahead and downplay it all you want but this is clear obstruction of justice. The reason Mueller's investigation is taking so long is because they keep on uncovering more crimes.
Yeah...Buzzfeed. Along with their "blockbuster" report by a guy who has a long history of making shite up (Karl Rove indicted, fake Enron emails, a proud alumnus of the truthout nutjob society), Buzzfeed other current top news stories literally are:
1) 19 Celebrity Instagrams you Probably Missed this Week
https://www.buzzfeed.com/morganmurrell/celebrity-instagrams-you-probably-missed-this-week-1-18-19
2) 21 Restrooms That Are Going To Make You Say, "Why Doesn't Every Restroom Have That?"
https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/restrooms-that-are-going-to-make-you-say-why-doesnt
3) 19 Old People Who — Bless Them — Are NOT Great With Technology
https://www.buzzfeed.com/farrahpenn/old-people-who-are-not-great-with-technology
4) 16 Honest Confessions From People In The Funeral Industry
https://www.buzzfeed.com/agh/confessions-funeral-home-workers-directors-job-mortician
5) 28 Small Things Under $20 That Will Truly Make A Difference In Your Day
https://www.buzzfeed.com/abbykass/small-things-under-20-dollars-that-will-make-a-big?origin=hpp
Admittedly, this is probably as hard-hitting as CNN and MSNBC in actual "news" value, but this is what the Left has now?
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are quite a pair...
God you are a dumbshit. I laughed about the Bezos story when it hit the main "newspapers" with sourcing outside of the National Enquirer...the fact the National Enquirer broke it is just comedy because of the Trump/WP/Bezos links. And, to everyone on the Bezos story's credit (NE and others), they had actual texts/pictures/etc...not 'I talked to a super-secret source who said these emails I haven't actually seen or read exist that say X which is the story my super-secret source wants to spin, and BTW I've been fired a few times for making shite like this up and being used for false shite like this before but this time I'm serious'.
Worked well for them in the Cohen to Prague claims...
You REALLY are bad at this...
-
Happy to oblige. I deny that is happening.Blu82 said:Per the Left, "You can look here but, you can't look over there".
How can there be justice when that is the measuring stick of right and wrong?
I'm sure one of you dumbfucks will attempt to deny that is happening.
-
Glad you can admit to being ignorant. That's the first step.HHusky said:
Happy to oblige. I deny that is happening.Blu82 said:Per the Left, "You can look here but, you can't look over there".
How can there be justice when that is the measuring stick of right and wrong?
I'm sure one of you dumbfucks will attempt to deny that is happening. -
is the science settled?HHusky said:
Happy to oblige. I deny that is happening.Blu82 said:Per the Left, "You can look here but, you can't look over there".
How can there be justice when that is the measuring stick of right and wrong?
I'm sure one of you dumbfucks will attempt to deny that is happening. -
Skeptics Shred BuzzFeed Over Trump Tower Scoop; Journo Admits He Hasn't Seen Evidence2001400ex said:
Post more zero hedge articles.HoustonHusky said:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left...
Skeptics are taking aim at a Thursday night BuzzFeed report that President Trump "personally instructed" his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Less than 12 hours after the report, its credibility has been called into question after the two journalists who wrote the story gave vastly different answers as to whether they had actually the evidence - while many have pointed to the "dubious past" of reporter Jason Leopold.
Anthony Cormier, Jason Leopold
Leopold came under fire for a 2006 Truthout.org article incorrectly reporting that Karl Rove had been indicted over the Valerie Plame CIA leak case - claiming that multiple anonymous sources "confirmed Rove's indictment is imminent."
As we learned last week, Rove isn't being indicted, and the supposed Truthout scoop by reporter Jason Leopold was wildly off the mark. It was but the latest installment in the tale of a troubled young reporter with a history of drug addiction whose aggressive disregard for the rules ended up embroiling me in a bizarre escapade -- and raised serious questions about journalistic ethics. -Joe Lauria, WaPo, 2006
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-18/skeptics-shred-buzzfeed-over-trump-tower-scoop-journo-admits-he-hasnt-seen-evidence
-
So now you are arguing one shitty source over another. Nice work!!Dude61 said:
Skeptics Shred BuzzFeed Over Trump Tower Scoop; Journo Admits He Hasn't Seen Evidence2001400ex said:
Post more zero hedge articles.HoustonHusky said:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left...
Skeptics are taking aim at a Thursday night BuzzFeed report that President Trump "personally instructed" his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Less than 12 hours after the report, its credibility has been called into question after the two journalists who wrote the story gave vastly different answers as to whether they had actually the evidence - while many have pointed to the "dubious past" of reporter Jason Leopold.
Anthony Cormier, Jason Leopold
Leopold came under fire for a 2006 Truthout.org article incorrectly reporting that Karl Rove had been indicted over the Valerie Plame CIA leak case - claiming that multiple anonymous sources "confirmed Rove's indictment is imminent."
As we learned last week, Rove isn't being indicted, and the supposed Truthout scoop by reporter Jason Leopold was wildly off the mark. It was but the latest installment in the tale of a troubled young reporter with a history of drug addiction whose aggressive disregard for the rules ended up embroiling me in a bizarre escapade -- and raised serious questions about journalistic ethics. -Joe Lauria, WaPo, 2006
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-18/skeptics-shred-buzzfeed-over-trump-tower-scoop-journo-admits-he-hasnt-seen-evidence -
They don't care and probably know its not true...its not the point. It becomes the "seriousness of the charge", followed by we (Congress) need to investigate to see if its true, to yet another fishing expedition (it might not be true, but we need to see if there is anything else that we can get them on).
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are just the lemmings needed to push the story forward for the first step of that process... -
The 80s called. It wants it’s forgein policy back.
-
Says the Kunt who routinely posts Media Matters and Think Progress articles.2001400ex said:
Post more zero hedge articles.HoustonHusky said:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left... -
Yeah, I'm sure that whole Bezos and his wife getting divorced on account of his affair was totally bogus as well.2001400ex said:
Funny how you were all in on the Bezos national inquirer story.HoustonHusky said:insinceredawg said:Go ahead and downplay it all you want but this is clear obstruction of justice. The reason Mueller's investigation is taking so long is because they keep on uncovering more crimes.
Yeah...Buzzfeed. Along with their "blockbuster" report by a guy who has a long history of making shite up (Karl Rove indicted, fake Enron emails, a proud alumnus of the truthout nutjob society), Buzzfeed other current top news stories literally are:
1) 19 Celebrity Instagrams you Probably Missed this Week
https://www.buzzfeed.com/morganmurrell/celebrity-instagrams-you-probably-missed-this-week-1-18-19
2) 21 Restrooms That Are Going To Make You Say, "Why Doesn't Every Restroom Have That?"
https://www.buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/restrooms-that-are-going-to-make-you-say-why-doesnt
3) 19 Old People Who — Bless Them — Are NOT Great With Technology
https://www.buzzfeed.com/farrahpenn/old-people-who-are-not-great-with-technology
4) 16 Honest Confessions From People In The Funeral Industry
https://www.buzzfeed.com/agh/confessions-funeral-home-workers-directors-job-mortician
5) 28 Small Things Under $20 That Will Truly Make A Difference In Your Day
https://www.buzzfeed.com/abbykass/small-things-under-20-dollars-that-will-make-a-big?origin=hpp
Admittedly, this is probably as hard-hitting as CNN and MSNBC in actual "news" value, but this is what the Left has now?
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are quite a pair...
Sweet Geezus you're a dipshit. -
2001400ex said:
So now you are arguing one shitty source over another. Nice work!!</blockquotDude61 said:
Skeptics Shred BuzzFeed Over Trump Tower Scoop; Journo Admits He Hasn't Seen Evidence2001400ex said:
Post more zero hedge articles.HoustonHusky said:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA:
Buzzfeed: "No, we have not seen the evidence in our report".
Edit: And one of the "authors" is Jason Leopold, who has been fired before for plagiarism and making sources up and literally making shit up that supposedly "emails" said.
This will go well for the Left...
Skeptics are taking aim at a Thursday night BuzzFeed report that President Trump "personally instructed" his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Less than 12 hours after the report, its credibility has been called into question after the two journalists who wrote the story gave vastly different answers as to whether they had actually the evidence - while many have pointed to the "dubious past" of reporter Jason Leopold.
Anthony Cormier, Jason Leopold
Leopold came under fire for a 2006 Truthout.org article incorrectly reporting that Karl Rove had been indicted over the Valerie Plame CIA leak case - claiming that multiple anonymous sources "confirmed Rove's indictment is imminent."
As we learned last week, Rove isn't being indicted, and the supposed Truthout scoop by reporter Jason Leopold was wildly off the mark. It was but the latest installment in the tale of a troubled young reporter with a history of drug addiction whose aggressive disregard for the rules ended up embroiling me in a bizarre escapade -- and raised serious questions about journalistic ethics. -Joe Lauria, WaPo, 2006
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-18/skeptics-shred-buzzfeed-over-trump-tower-scoop-journo-admits-he-hasnt-seen-evidence
Unlike Buzzfeed, ZH has identifiable sources.
Jason Leopold has a history of drug addiction and a habit of quoting anonymous sources....and eventually admitting he has no proof. -
Now you hate fishing expeditions after cheering on emails and Benghazi.HoustonHusky said:They don't care and probably know its not true...its not the point. It becomes the "seriousness of the charge", followed by we (Congress) need to investigate to see if its true, to yet another fishing expedition (it might not be true, but we need to see if there is anything else that we can get them on).
HondoFS and SincerelyFS are just the lemmings needed to push the story forward for the first step of that process... -
Friday follies
This is routine now
