Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Your newest member of the House Financial Services Committee
Comments
-
And so blob shifts from Bush was "long gone" all the way to "but Obama didn't oppose any of Bush's proposed spending". 'Cuz blob's about the honesty.SFGbob said:
Approved in Calendar year 2008 and passed by both the Rat held Congress and the Rat held Senate. Obama's stimulus package that was passed by the Rat held House and Rat held Senate also added to that 2009 budget.HHusky said:
No, you just said, "Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP" in FY 2009. That would be the budget approved in calendar year 2008, of course. You're at least as honest as Daddy is, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a liar and moron I'm sure that's how they come across. I never said that it was all Obama's fault or that Bush had nothing to do with it. You come across as exactly like what you are Hondo, a strawman ass fucking moron who can't address what people here actually say.2001400ex said:
Read your comments, that's exactly how they come across.SFGbob said:
I not only care about what happened I actually know what happened, and I know that you of all people aren't going to provide me with any information that will add to my knowledge on that topic.2001400ex said:
So you don't care to understand what happened. You just want to think Bush had nothing to do with it and it's all Obama fault.SFGbob said:
Go fuck yourself, until you start answering questions I'm not responding to your requests Kunt.2001400ex said:
Answer these questions.SFGbob said:
Bush was long gone from office when spending went to 24.3% of GDP Hondo and that number comes from the depth of the recession and includes both TARP and stimulus fraud spending.2001400ex said:
Well given that spending went from 17.6% of GDP to 24.3% under Bush. No. I wouldn't call that austerity.SFGbob said:
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.2001400ex said:
Stop hitting Bob with context and facts.HardlyClothed said:
Federal spending as a % of GDP:SFGbob said:
And rather that happen than a dipshit you claimed we "gutted" welfare in the 1990s despite the fact that welfare spending increased by $30B during the 90s. Or someone who thinks a budget with $700B in deficit spending is a sign of "austerity."HardlyClothed said:
Seems as if the people that “know a great deal about banking” tend to always side with the banks on any substantive matterSwaye said:I expect she knows a great deal about banking. Don't care. WOOD.
2009 - 24.3%
2010 - 23%
2011 - 23%
2012 - 21.8%
2013 - 20.5%
2014 - 20%
2015 - 20%
2016 - 20%
Number of welfare recipients in 2000 declined by 53% from 1996.
I know that yelling on this website is how you get your daily dopamine hit but you can log off now.
I thought the goal of welfare was to transition people back into the workforce making them productive members of society. Now we know that's an example of Welfare being "gutted."
Did we have an "austerity" budget under George W. Bush Hondo? Because there wasn't a single year of his presidency where the Federal Government spent more than 21% our GDP and every year but one was less than then numbers you're giving me now as "austerity." Hell in 2001 we spend 17.6% of our GDP and I don't recall anyone talking about austerity. Weird how you left out that "context" and those "facts."
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.
BTW. I'd also look up what that word means.
I don't need to look up the meaning of austerity Hondo, you're the one who has your own person Kunt definition for words, not me.
Who pushed tarp?
How much of the stimulus was spent by 2009 year end?
And Bush was in charge for almost 4 of the 9 months of 09.
Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP. And Obama and the rest of the Rat controlled Congress voted for TARP.
Either way, spending above 20% of GDP happened in only just a few years since WWII. Claiming 21.8% of spending to GDP while running $800B plus budget deficits represents some kind of "austerity" budget is pure bullshit.
Educate yourself man. Seriously.
I never claimed Bush had nothing to do with it or that it was all Obama's fault but a strawman ass fucker has got to do what a strawman ass fucker does.
The only topic you could "educate" me on Hondo is how to be a lying cocksucking piece of shit and frankly I have no interest in that.
Research how much of the stimulus was spent in FY 09. Yes 10 was on Obama, stimulus, shitty economy, Medicare part D, etc. But 09 had very little to do with Obama.
That's just facts.
I'm not denying that Bush signed the budget but Obama and his party's finger prints are also all over that spending. It's not as if Obama opposed any of that spending, and he was more than happy to take credit for TARP and the Stimulus Fraud when he could use them to claim that's how he saved us from economic ruin. -
I didn't say welfare was gutted. Someone else used Clinton's words "end welfare as we know it" in quotes as sarcasm that you of course took literally. I've been laughing at you about that for few days now.SFGbob said:
Why are you saying you like sucking dick Hondo? Why have you done nothing to address your bullshit about Obama's budget being an "austerity" budget? Why have you done nothing to support your bullshit about Welfare being "gutted" simply because people left it as they found jobs?2001400ex said:
Why won't you research how much of the stimulus was spent in the FY 09 fiscal year?SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a liar and moron I'm sure that's how they come across. I never said that it was all Obama's fault or that Bush had nothing to do with it. You come across as exactly like what you are Hondo, a strawman ass fucking moron who can't address what people here actually say.2001400ex said:
Read your comments, that's exactly how they come across.SFGbob said:
I not only care about what happened I actually know what happened, and I know that you of all people aren't going to provide me with any information that will add to my knowledge on that topic.2001400ex said:
So you don't care to understand what happened. You just want to think Bush had nothing to do with it and it's all Obama fault.SFGbob said:
Go fuck yourself, until you start answering questions I'm not responding to your requests Kunt.2001400ex said:
Answer these questions.SFGbob said:
Bush was long gone from office when spending went to 24.3% of GDP Hondo and that number comes from the depth of the recession and includes both TARP and stimulus fraud spending.2001400ex said:
Well given that spending went from 17.6% of GDP to 24.3% under Bush. No. I wouldn't call that austerity.SFGbob said:
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.2001400ex said:
Stop hitting Bob with context and facts.HardlyClothed said:
Federal spending as a % of GDP:SFGbob said:
And rather that happen than a dipshit you claimed we "gutted" welfare in the 1990s despite the fact that welfare spending increased by $30B during the 90s. Or someone who thinks a budget with $700B in deficit spending is a sign of "austerity."HardlyClothed said:
Seems as if the people that “know a great deal about banking” tend to always side with the banks on any substantive matterSwaye said:I expect she knows a great deal about banking. Don't care. WOOD.
2009 - 24.3%
2010 - 23%
2011 - 23%
2012 - 21.8%
2013 - 20.5%
2014 - 20%
2015 - 20%
2016 - 20%
Number of welfare recipients in 2000 declined by 53% from 1996.
I know that yelling on this website is how you get your daily dopamine hit but you can log off now.
I thought the goal of welfare was to transition people back into the workforce making them productive members of society. Now we know that's an example of Welfare being "gutted."
Did we have an "austerity" budget under George W. Bush Hondo? Because there wasn't a single year of his presidency where the Federal Government spent more than 21% our GDP and every year but one was less than then numbers you're giving me now as "austerity." Hell in 2001 we spend 17.6% of our GDP and I don't recall anyone talking about austerity. Weird how you left out that "context" and those "facts."
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.
BTW. I'd also look up what that word means.
I don't need to look up the meaning of austerity Hondo, you're the one who has your own person Kunt definition for words, not me.
Who pushed tarp?
How much of the stimulus was spent by 2009 year end?
And Bush was in charge for almost 4 of the 9 months of 09.
Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP. And Obama and the rest of the Rat controlled Congress voted for TARP.
Either way, spending above 20% of GDP happened in only just a few years since WWII. Claiming 21.8% of spending to GDP while running $800B plus budget deficits represents some kind of "austerity" budget is pure bullshit.
Educate yourself man. Seriously.
I never claimed Bush had nothing to do with it or that it was all Obama's fault but a strawman ass fucker has got to do what a strawman ass fucker does.
The only topic you could "educate" me on Hondo is how to be a lying cocksucking piece of shit and frankly I have no interest in that.
Research how much of the stimulus was spent in FY 09. Yes 10 was on Obama, stimulus, shitty economy, Medicare part D, etc. But 09 had very little to do with Obama.
That's just facts.
I don't know how much of it was spent in 2009 but I know that part of it was budgeted to 2009 and added to the budget deficit. There isn't a piece of spending in that 2009 budget that Obama voted against and all of it was passed by a Rat held Congress.
Did Obama vote for unfunded Medicare part D?
Seriously, look up how much Obama put his fingers on in 09. He does have a part but it's less than $100 billion.
Why are you afraid to educate yourself even if the answer goes against your preconceived notions? -
I didn't say welfare was gutted.
No, just the guy who's ass your were tonguing claiming he'd provided "context and facts" said it. Are you backtracking on that now Hondo? I didn't respond to "end welfare as we know it" Kunt. I specifically responded to the claim that we "gutted" Welfare so laugh at that you strawman ass fucking Kunt.
Obama voted for TARP you lying piece of crap and he voted in favor of the 2009 Budget. He had his fingers on a lot more than $100B. What a lying worthless piece of shit you are Hondo.
I love it when this lying fucking moron talks to me about educating myself while he blatantly lies and misrepresents the facts. -
No, I haven't "shifted" from anything. That was always my position. Spending as a percentage of GDP reached its peak when Obama was in office and Bush was long gone. All of this spending stemmed from budgets and programs that Obama and his party supported and some of it stemmed from spending solely supported by Obama and his party. Cash for Clunkers wasn't a Bush program. The stimulus fraud wasn't a Bush program. Sorry if those facts make your Kunt hurt O'Keefed.HHusky said:
And so blob shifts from Bush was "long gone" all the way to "but Obama didn't oppose any of Bush's proposed spending". 'Cuz blob's about the honesty.SFGbob said:
Approved in Calendar year 2008 and passed by both the Rat held Congress and the Rat held Senate. Obama's stimulus package that was passed by the Rat held House and Rat held Senate also added to that 2009 budget.HHusky said:
No, you just said, "Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP" in FY 2009. That would be the budget approved in calendar year 2008, of course. You're at least as honest as Daddy is, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a liar and moron I'm sure that's how they come across. I never said that it was all Obama's fault or that Bush had nothing to do with it. You come across as exactly like what you are Hondo, a strawman ass fucking moron who can't address what people here actually say.2001400ex said:
Read your comments, that's exactly how they come across.SFGbob said:
I not only care about what happened I actually know what happened, and I know that you of all people aren't going to provide me with any information that will add to my knowledge on that topic.2001400ex said:
So you don't care to understand what happened. You just want to think Bush had nothing to do with it and it's all Obama fault.SFGbob said:
Go fuck yourself, until you start answering questions I'm not responding to your requests Kunt.2001400ex said:
Answer these questions.SFGbob said:
Bush was long gone from office when spending went to 24.3% of GDP Hondo and that number comes from the depth of the recession and includes both TARP and stimulus fraud spending.2001400ex said:
Well given that spending went from 17.6% of GDP to 24.3% under Bush. No. I wouldn't call that austerity.SFGbob said:
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.2001400ex said:
Stop hitting Bob with context and facts.HardlyClothed said:
Federal spending as a % of GDP:SFGbob said:
And rather that happen than a dipshit you claimed we "gutted" welfare in the 1990s despite the fact that welfare spending increased by $30B during the 90s. Or someone who thinks a budget with $700B in deficit spending is a sign of "austerity."HardlyClothed said:
Seems as if the people that “know a great deal about banking” tend to always side with the banks on any substantive matterSwaye said:I expect she knows a great deal about banking. Don't care. WOOD.
2009 - 24.3%
2010 - 23%
2011 - 23%
2012 - 21.8%
2013 - 20.5%
2014 - 20%
2015 - 20%
2016 - 20%
Number of welfare recipients in 2000 declined by 53% from 1996.
I know that yelling on this website is how you get your daily dopamine hit but you can log off now.
I thought the goal of welfare was to transition people back into the workforce making them productive members of society. Now we know that's an example of Welfare being "gutted."
Did we have an "austerity" budget under George W. Bush Hondo? Because there wasn't a single year of his presidency where the Federal Government spent more than 21% our GDP and every year but one was less than then numbers you're giving me now as "austerity." Hell in 2001 we spend 17.6% of our GDP and I don't recall anyone talking about austerity. Weird how you left out that "context" and those "facts."
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.
BTW. I'd also look up what that word means.
I don't need to look up the meaning of austerity Hondo, you're the one who has your own person Kunt definition for words, not me.
Who pushed tarp?
How much of the stimulus was spent by 2009 year end?
And Bush was in charge for almost 4 of the 9 months of 09.
Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP. And Obama and the rest of the Rat controlled Congress voted for TARP.
Either way, spending above 20% of GDP happened in only just a few years since WWII. Claiming 21.8% of spending to GDP while running $800B plus budget deficits represents some kind of "austerity" budget is pure bullshit.
Educate yourself man. Seriously.
I never claimed Bush had nothing to do with it or that it was all Obama's fault but a strawman ass fucker has got to do what a strawman ass fucker does.
The only topic you could "educate" me on Hondo is how to be a lying cocksucking piece of shit and frankly I have no interest in that.
Research how much of the stimulus was spent in FY 09. Yes 10 was on Obama, stimulus, shitty economy, Medicare part D, etc. But 09 had very little to do with Obama.
That's just facts.
I'm not denying that Bush signed the budget but Obama and his party's finger prints are also all over that spending. It's not as if Obama opposed any of that spending, and he was more than happy to take credit for TARP and the Stimulus Fraud when he could use them to claim that's how he saved us from economic ruin.
-
Where did I say Obama didn't vote for tarp? You are going senile old man.SFGbob said:I didn't say welfare was gutted.
No, just the guy who's ass your were tonguing claiming he'd provided "context and facts" said it. Are you backtracking on that now Hondo? I didn't respond to "end welfare as we know it" Kunt. I specifically responded to the claim that we "gutted" Welfare so laugh at that you strawman ass fucking Kunt.
Obama voted for TARP you lying piece of crap and he voted in favor of the 2009 Budget. He had his fingers on a lot more than $100B. What a lying worthless piece of shit you are Hondo.
I love it when this lying fucking moron talks to me about educating myself while he blatantly lies and misrepresents the facts.
Look up the stimulus. Seriously. -
Republicans pushed tarp and voted for the stimulus. Now you are solely blaming Obama. El oh El.SFGbob said:
No, I haven't "shifted" from anything. That was always my position. Spending as a percentage of GDP reached its peak when Obama was in office and Bush was long gone. All of this spending stemmed from budgets and programs that Obama and his party supported and some of it stemmed from spending solely supported by Obama and his party. Cash for Clunkers wasn't a Bush program. The stimulus fraud wasn't a Bush program. Sorry if those facts make your Kunt hurt O'Keefed.HHusky said:
And so blob shifts from Bush was "long gone" all the way to "but Obama didn't oppose any of Bush's proposed spending". 'Cuz blob's about the honesty.SFGbob said:
Approved in Calendar year 2008 and passed by both the Rat held Congress and the Rat held Senate. Obama's stimulus package that was passed by the Rat held House and Rat held Senate also added to that 2009 budget.HHusky said:
No, you just said, "Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP" in FY 2009. That would be the budget approved in calendar year 2008, of course. You're at least as honest as Daddy is, blob.SFGbob said:
Yes, if you're a liar and moron I'm sure that's how they come across. I never said that it was all Obama's fault or that Bush had nothing to do with it. You come across as exactly like what you are Hondo, a strawman ass fucking moron who can't address what people here actually say.2001400ex said:
Read your comments, that's exactly how they come across.SFGbob said:
I not only care about what happened I actually know what happened, and I know that you of all people aren't going to provide me with any information that will add to my knowledge on that topic.2001400ex said:
So you don't care to understand what happened. You just want to think Bush had nothing to do with it and it's all Obama fault.SFGbob said:
Go fuck yourself, until you start answering questions I'm not responding to your requests Kunt.2001400ex said:
Answer these questions.SFGbob said:
Bush was long gone from office when spending went to 24.3% of GDP Hondo and that number comes from the depth of the recession and includes both TARP and stimulus fraud spending.2001400ex said:
Well given that spending went from 17.6% of GDP to 24.3% under Bush. No. I wouldn't call that austerity.SFGbob said:
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.2001400ex said:
Stop hitting Bob with context and facts.HardlyClothed said:
Federal spending as a % of GDP:SFGbob said:
And rather that happen than a dipshit you claimed we "gutted" welfare in the 1990s despite the fact that welfare spending increased by $30B during the 90s. Or someone who thinks a budget with $700B in deficit spending is a sign of "austerity."HardlyClothed said:
Seems as if the people that “know a great deal about banking” tend to always side with the banks on any substantive matterSwaye said:I expect she knows a great deal about banking. Don't care. WOOD.
2009 - 24.3%
2010 - 23%
2011 - 23%
2012 - 21.8%
2013 - 20.5%
2014 - 20%
2015 - 20%
2016 - 20%
Number of welfare recipients in 2000 declined by 53% from 1996.
I know that yelling on this website is how you get your daily dopamine hit but you can log off now.
I thought the goal of welfare was to transition people back into the workforce making them productive members of society. Now we know that's an example of Welfare being "gutted."
Did we have an "austerity" budget under George W. Bush Hondo? Because there wasn't a single year of his presidency where the Federal Government spent more than 21% our GDP and every year but one was less than then numbers you're giving me now as "austerity." Hell in 2001 we spend 17.6% of our GDP and I don't recall anyone talking about austerity. Weird how you left out that "context" and those "facts."
Work the balls Hondo, work the balls.
BTW. I'd also look up what that word means.
I don't need to look up the meaning of austerity Hondo, you're the one who has your own person Kunt definition for words, not me.
Who pushed tarp?
How much of the stimulus was spent by 2009 year end?
And Bush was in charge for almost 4 of the 9 months of 09.
Bush was long gone before spending rose to 24.3% of GDP. And Obama and the rest of the Rat controlled Congress voted for TARP.
Either way, spending above 20% of GDP happened in only just a few years since WWII. Claiming 21.8% of spending to GDP while running $800B plus budget deficits represents some kind of "austerity" budget is pure bullshit.
Educate yourself man. Seriously.
I never claimed Bush had nothing to do with it or that it was all Obama's fault but a strawman ass fucker has got to do what a strawman ass fucker does.
The only topic you could "educate" me on Hondo is how to be a lying cocksucking piece of shit and frankly I have no interest in that.
Research how much of the stimulus was spent in FY 09. Yes 10 was on Obama, stimulus, shitty economy, Medicare part D, etc. But 09 had very little to do with Obama.
That's just facts.
I'm not denying that Bush signed the budget but Obama and his party's finger prints are also all over that spending. It's not as if Obama opposed any of that spending, and he was more than happy to take credit for TARP and the Stimulus Fraud when he could use them to claim that's how he saved us from economic ruin.
It's ok to place blame on conversing m conservatives too.
And you ignoring Medicare part D didn't go unnoticed. -
When you claimed that his fingers were only on less than a $100 Billion of the 2009 Spending2001400ex said:
Where did I say Obama didn't vote for tarp? You are going senile old man.SFGbob said:I didn't say welfare was gutted.
No, just the guy who's ass your were tonguing claiming he'd provided "context and facts" said it. Are you backtracking on that now Hondo? I didn't respond to "end welfare as we know it" Kunt. I specifically responded to the claim that we "gutted" Welfare so laugh at that you strawman ass fucking Kunt.
Obama voted for TARP you lying piece of crap and he voted in favor of the 2009 Budget. He had his fingers on a lot more than $100B. What a lying worthless piece of shit you are Hondo.
I love it when this lying fucking moron talks to me about educating myself while he blatantly lies and misrepresents the facts.
Look up the stimulus. Seriously.
You're lying like you always do Kunt. Obama voted for TARP, he voted for the 2009 Budget, He signed the Stimulus fraud and spent money from that program in 2009. Cash for clunkers was an Obama program.
He had his fingers on a lot more than $100B in spending. What spending in 2009 did Obama oppose Hondo?
-
Can you agree that Bush pushed tarp and pushed Medicare part D and Republicans also voted for the stimulus?
-
Can you admit you lied your ass off when you claimed that Obama only had his finger prints on less than $100B in spending in 2009. There wasn't single Republican in the House that voted for the stimulus fraud and in the Senate I believe it got 3 Republican votes. Bush did push TARP and more Rats voted in favor of it in both the House and the Senate than did Republicans.
-
Hey Hondo lets talk about Medicare Part D. I opposed it. It also received Rat votes in support of it. As I recall, the Rats opposed it because they favored an even more expensive plan. It passed long before Obama was elected to the Senate.
So while Medicare part D was part of 2009 Budget, if the Rats would have gotten there way spending on that program would have been even greater.
Funny how you left out that "context" Hondo. -
Actually Democrats argued it should be funded. But facts aren't you strong suit.SFGbob said:Hey Hondo lets talk about Medicare Part D. I opposed it. It also received Rat votes in support of it. As I recall, the Rats opposed it because they favored an even more expensive plan. It passed long before Obama was elected to the Senate.
So while Medicare part D was part of 2009 Budget, if the Rats would have gotten there way spending on that program would have been even greater.
Funny how you left out that "context" Hondo. -
Just like legislation on both sides. They bribed a few congressman to get the bill passed.SFGbob said:Can you admit you lied your ass off when you claimed that Obama only had his finger prints on less than $100B in spending in 2009. There wasn't single Republican in the House that voted for the stimulus fraud and in the Senate I believe it got 3 Republican votes. Bush did push TARP and more Rats voted in favor of it in both the House and the Senate than did Republicans.
And no when you read for comprehension, what I said about Obama is correct. You look up the stimulus spending yet? -
Everybody does it
But but but BUSH!!!! -
Pure bullshit. They wanted a more generous program and they didn’t give fuck about funding2001400ex said:
Actually Democrats argued it should be funded. But facts aren't you strong suit.SFGbob said:Hey Hondo lets talk about Medicare Part D. I opposed it. It also received Rat votes in support of it. As I recall, the Rats opposed it because they favored an even more expensive plan. It passed long before Obama was elected to the Senate.
So while Medicare part D was part of 2009 Budget, if the Rats would have gotten there way spending on that program would have been even greater.
Funny how you left out that "context" Hondo. -
More crap, plenty of Rats voted for TARP, including Obama. More Rats voted in favor of TARP than did Republicans. But I guess you don’t hold Obama responsible for the things he votes for.2001400ex said:
Just like legislation on both sides. They bribed a few congressman to get the bill passed.SFGbob said:Can you admit you lied your ass off when you claimed that Obama only had his finger prints on less than $100B in spending in 2009. There wasn't single Republican in the House that voted for the stimulus fraud and in the Senate I believe it got 3 Republican votes. Bush did push TARP and more Rats voted in favor of it in both the House and the Senate than did Republicans.
And no when you read for comprehension, what I said about Obama is correct. You look up the stimulus spending yet?
Shocking that Hondo holds a black guy to a lower standard of responsibility.
Was Obama bribed for his TARP vote Hondo? -
That troll that used to represent Maryland, Barbara Milkowski called the GOP bill “measly” and was angry that the plan backed by Ted Kennedy and the Rats, that was far more generous didn’t pass.
They didn’t give a fuck about how it was funded -
Democrats want to fold a prescription drug benefit into the existing Medicare system. Under their plan, seniors would pay a premium of $25 a month and face an annual $100 deducible. There would be a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit for beneficiaries, and Medicare would pay 80 percent of drug costs.
The Democratic plan would cost an estimated $700 billion to $900 billion, more expensive than the $400 billion Bush has vowed to commit to overhauling Medicare.
What’s it like being a lying dipshit Hondo? -
First your $400 billion ended up over $500. But the main issue Democrats cited was it was not funded. There were other excuses of course.SFGbob said:
Democrats want to fold a prescription drug benefit into the existing Medicare system. Under their plan, seniors would pay a premium of $25 a month and face an annual $100 deducible. There would be a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit for beneficiaries, and Medicare would pay 80 percent of drug costs.
The Democratic plan would cost an estimated $700 billion to $900 billion, more expensive than the $400 billion Bush has vowed to commit to overhauling Medicare.
What’s it like being a lying dipshit Hondo?
https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/medicare-part-d-republican-budget-busting/ -
And you wonder why they call you racist.SFGbob said:
More crap, plenty of Rats voted for TARP, including Obama. More Rats voted in favor of TARP than did Republicans. But I guess you don’t hold Obama responsible for the things he votes for.2001400ex said:
Just like legislation on both sides. They bribed a few congressman to get the bill passed.SFGbob said:Can you admit you lied your ass off when you claimed that Obama only had his finger prints on less than $100B in spending in 2009. There wasn't single Republican in the House that voted for the stimulus fraud and in the Senate I believe it got 3 Republican votes. Bush did push TARP and more Rats voted in favor of it in both the House and the Senate than did Republicans.
And no when you read for comprehension, what I said about Obama is correct. You look up the stimulus spending yet?
Shocking that Hondo holds a black guy to a lower standard of responsibility.
Was Obama bribed for his TARP vote Hondo? -
You're the racist in this thread.2001400ex said:
And you wonder why they call you racist.SFGbob said:
More crap, plenty of Rats voted for TARP, including Obama. More Rats voted in favor of TARP than did Republicans. But I guess you don’t hold Obama responsible for the things he votes for.2001400ex said:
Just like legislation on both sides. They bribed a few congressman to get the bill passed.SFGbob said:Can you admit you lied your ass off when you claimed that Obama only had his finger prints on less than $100B in spending in 2009. There wasn't single Republican in the House that voted for the stimulus fraud and in the Senate I believe it got 3 Republican votes. Bush did push TARP and more Rats voted in favor of it in both the House and the Senate than did Republicans.
And no when you read for comprehension, what I said about Obama is correct. You look up the stimulus spending yet?
Shocking that Hondo holds a black guy to a lower standard of responsibility.
Was Obama bribed for his TARP vote Hondo?
GFY
-
allpurpleallgold said:
So did Ronald Reagan.pawz said:
So does Kashama Sawant.allpurpleallgold said:
Good news! She has a degree in economics.Swaye said:I expect she knows a great deal about banking. Don't care. WOOD.
You're one of my favorite classy posters, but you're really struggling this morning.
You’re being a fucking idiot.
Views of Economics:
Reagan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AOC >>>> SAWANT
HTH
-
Thread.fagged.out
-
Always love it when Hondo posts a link that doesn't refute a fucking word I said nor does it support anything he said.2001400ex said:
First your $400 billion ended up over $500. But the main issue Democrats cited was it was not funded. There were other excuses of course.SFGbob said:
Democrats want to fold a prescription drug benefit into the existing Medicare system. Under their plan, seniors would pay a premium of $25 a month and face an annual $100 deducible. There would be a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit for beneficiaries, and Medicare would pay 80 percent of drug costs.
The Democratic plan would cost an estimated $700 billion to $900 billion, more expensive than the $400 billion Bush has vowed to commit to overhauling Medicare.
What’s it like being a lying dipshit Hondo?
https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/medicare-part-d-republican-budget-busting/
The entire reason Hondo's even talking about Medicare Part D is in a pathetic attempt to try and claim that Obama had no responsibility for any of the spending in the 2009 budget.
-
Yo dumbfuck. You said Democrats didn't give a fuck about funding. What do you think the calls to raise Medicare taxes are?SFGbob said:
Always love it when Hondo posts a link that doesn't refute a fucking word I said nor does it support anything he said.2001400ex said:
First your $400 billion ended up over $500. But the main issue Democrats cited was it was not funded. There were other excuses of course.SFGbob said:
Democrats want to fold a prescription drug benefit into the existing Medicare system. Under their plan, seniors would pay a premium of $25 a month and face an annual $100 deducible. There would be a $2,000 out-of-pocket limit for beneficiaries, and Medicare would pay 80 percent of drug costs.
The Democratic plan would cost an estimated $700 billion to $900 billion, more expensive than the $400 billion Bush has vowed to commit to overhauling Medicare.
What’s it like being a lying dipshit Hondo?
https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/medicare-part-d-republican-budget-busting/
The entire reason Hondo's even talking about Medicare Part D is in a pathetic attempt to try and claim that Obama had no responsibility for any of the spending in the 2009 budget.
You still don't understand austerity and are too fucking stupid to look up how much ARRA funds were spent in each year. -
The Rats proposed a plan that was twice as expensive was what the GOP proposed. There is nothing in what you linked that shows the Rats were calling to raise Medicare taxes in order to pay for their plan. You are pulling claims straight out of your ass.
Obama voted for TARP as did most of the Rats in the Senate. More Rats voted for TARP than did Republicans. The Rats controlled both the House and the Senate. Not a single Republican voted for Obama's Stimulus fraud in the House and only three Republicans voted for it in the Senate.
Obama voted for the budget that he inherited when he became President and much of his crap spending, like Clash for Clunkers was part of the 2009 budget.
But according to Hondo, Obama wasn't responsible for any of this.
I can only conclude that Hondo is such a fucking racist he just doesn't hold blacks responsible for their actions. He thinks of them like children who know not what they do.
So what is "austerity" since I don't understand it Hondo. Dance you stupid Kunt, dance!!!
