Justus Legg, 3* 2019 BUCK, Auburn (Riverside?), WA
Comments
-
The burden is not on me to prove your unproven claim wrong, that's not how it works.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
Good luck. -
Lol that's what I thought, you lose.HillsboroDuck said:
The burden is not on me to prove your unproven claim wrong, that's not how it works.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
Good luck.
-
StrongBallz spreads aids faster on HH than it spread in Africa.
-
This isn't even true, not that I should be surprised. My post was in response to @FremontTroll's response to your claim that "OSU is not putting receivers in the league like they should". His post debunked your unfounded claim with listing 7 receivers picked in 5 years. I didn't need to prove your claim wrong and wasn't trying to prove it wrong (since it was already done) I simply added that Thomas is top 5 to illustrate that, not only do they have quantity, they have quality as well.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
tOSU is right there with the top schools in the country at putting WR's in the NFL numerically, and in the last four years they have produced one of the best 5 receivers in the league as well.
There is simply no way to paint tOSU as some kind of failure at putting out receivers in any land but Ballz Land.
You're wrong. Again. -
Oh so you're saying you were just arguing semantics on a tangent. You lose again.HillsboroDuck said:
This isn't even true, not that I should be surprised. My post was in response to @FremontTroll's response to your claim that "OSU is not putting receivers in the league like they should". His post debunked your unfounded claim with listing 7 receivers picked in 5 years. I didn't need to prove your claim wrong and wasn't trying to prove it wrong (since it was already done) I simply added that Thomas is top 5 to illustrate that, not only do they have quantity, they have quality as well.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
tOSU is right there with the top schools in the country at putting WR's in the NFL numerically, and in the last four years they have produced one of the best 5 receivers in the league as well.
There is simply no way to paint tOSU as some kind of failure at putting out receivers in any land but Ballz Land.
You're wrong. Again. -
StrongArmCobra said:
Oh so you're saying you were just arguing semantics on a tangent. You lose again.HillsboroDuck said:
This isn't even true, not that I should be surprised. My post was in response to @FremontTroll's response to your claim that "OSU is not putting receivers in the league like they should". His post debunked your unfounded claim with listing 7 receivers picked in 5 years. I didn't need to prove your claim wrong and wasn't trying to prove it wrong (since it was already done) I simply added that Thomas is top 5 to illustrate that, not only do they have quantity, they have quality as well.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
tOSU is right there with the top schools in the country at putting WR's in the NFL numerically, and in the last four years they have produced one of the best 5 receivers in the league as well.
There is simply no way to paint tOSU as some kind of failure at putting out receivers in any land but Ballz Land.
You're wrong. Again.
-
Yeah that's what I thought.HillsboroDuck said:StrongArmCobra said:
Oh so you're saying you were just arguing semantics on a tangent. You lose again.HillsboroDuck said:
This isn't even true, not that I should be surprised. My post was in response to @FremontTroll's response to your claim that "OSU is not putting receivers in the league like they should". His post debunked your unfounded claim with listing 7 receivers picked in 5 years. I didn't need to prove your claim wrong and wasn't trying to prove it wrong (since it was already done) I simply added that Thomas is top 5 to illustrate that, not only do they have quantity, they have quality as well.StrongArmCobra said:
The claim you made about Thomas was in an attempt to prove that Ohio State wide receivers have not underachieved based on their rankings. Thomas alone is not enough to prove that. That is one data point while ignoring the rest. The burden is on you. I'm waiting.HillsboroDuck said:
That's your hypothesis, it's on you to back it up.StrongArmCobra said:Nobody cares about Michael Thomas. Most people don't even know who he is so obviously he ain't that good.
Top 5 WR in NFL:
1. Julio Jones
2. Deandre Hopkins
3. Antonio Brown
4. Odell Beckham Jr.
5. Tyler Lockett
Why are you ignoring my proposition @HillsboroDuck . Please prove Ohio State WRs overall haven't underachieved in comparison to their rankings. If you can't do that and all you can do is point out one exception and ignore the rest then you lose.
The only claim I made here is that Thomas is a top 5 receiver.
You disagreed.
You were wrong.
Feel free to do your own research to back up one of the claims you pull out of your ass for once.
tOSU is right there with the top schools in the country at putting WR's in the NFL numerically, and in the last four years they have produced one of the best 5 receivers in the league as well.
There is simply no way to paint tOSU as some kind of failure at putting out receivers in any land but Ballz Land.
You're wrong. Again. -
ISAFNRCbackthepack said:StrongBallz spreads aids faster on HH than it spread in Africa.
#teamrawdawg -
Frozen or evaporated water isn't water. I don't call them water. I don't care what grade school chemistry says about three states of matter. What counts is that it's not called water. It's called ice.
Can you prove me wrong? Didn't think so.
You lose, bitch. -
So what's going on with Justus Legg?
