Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The perfect encapsulation of the leftist mind.

17891012

Comments

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    If you have a problem I suggest you read again what he said.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.

    He doesn't say that the role of government is to be used as a vehicle for you to force your values on others. If Wall Street has harmed you then government has a role in addressing that. It's not government's job to arm you with a club simply because you hate capitalism and want to punish successful people.

    Now would you care to address your belief that people can't have sex without having children?

    I’m not enforcing any values. The people on Wall Street sent this country into a recession. The other people in this country need protection from that. Do you disagree that the recession was harmful to the average American? I’d love to hear you make that case. Otherwise, your standard is the government needs to protect me from them.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Did I quote your post and claim that’s what you said? Who was I talking to? If I have a problem with something you wrote I’ll let you know.

    Some of you need to learn the difference between when I’m talking to Race and when I’m talking to you.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    If it’s all about giving kids the best chance for success why aren’t we paying for them to go to college?

    Because MOST kids don't belong on college campuses, as we can plainly see everyday. MOST kids need job skills and job training, not to be endlessly pondering what future trauma Jack will endure after he switches his anatomy to Jill.
    I’m not the one that spent their entire childhood telling them they have to go to college. But since you’re concerned about it...

    “And let me be very clear, I am not just talking about 4 year universities and colleges. I am talking about community colleges. I am talking about vocational schools. I am talking about apprenticeships. We desperately need highly trained and highly skilled electricians, welders, plumbers, mechanics, pipe fitters and health care workers of every kind”.

    -Bernie Sanders
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2019

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Did I quote your post and claim that’s what you said? Who was I talking to? If I have a problem with something you wrote I’ll let you know.

    Some of you need to learn the difference between when I’m talking to Race and when I’m talking to you.
    Yes, you referred to me and said what I “seem to think”. Sounds like you were letting me know you had a problem with what I said. So fuck off.

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.


  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    edited January 2019

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    If you have a problem I suggest you read again what he said.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.

    He doesn't say that the role of government is to be used as a vehicle for you to force your values on others. If Wall Street has harmed you then government has a role in addressing that. It's not government's job to arm you with a club simply because you hate capitalism and want to punish successful people.

    Now would you care to address your belief that people can't have sex without having children?

    I’m not enforcing any values. The people on Wall Street sent this country into a recession. The other people in this country need protection from that. Do you disagree that the recession was harmful to the average American? I’d love to hear you make that case. Otherwise, your standard is the government needs to protect me from them.
    Without the government that you love so much Wall Street wouldn't have been in a position to put the country into a recession. You want to use the power of government to force your morality on others. That was part of problem and what eventually led to the housing meltdown.

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Did I quote your post and claim that’s what you said? Who was I talking to? If I have a problem with something you wrote I’ll let you know.

    Some of you need to learn the difference between when I’m talking to Race and when I’m talking to you.
    Yes, you referred to me and said what I “seem to think”. Sounds like you were letting me know you had a problem with what I said. So fuck off.

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.


    I didn’t even @you Mike. Don’t worry about it.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    If you have a problem I suggest you read again what he said.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.

    He doesn't say that the role of government is to be used as a vehicle for you to force your values on others. If Wall Street has harmed you then government has a role in addressing that. It's not government's job to arm you with a club simply because you hate capitalism and want to punish successful people.

    Now would you care to address your belief that people can't have sex without having children?

    I’m not enforcing any values. The people on Wall Street sent this country into a recession. The other people in this country need protection from that. Do you disagree that the recession was harmful to the average American? I’d love to hear you make that case. Otherwise, your standard is the government needs to protect me from them.
    Without the government that you love so much Wall Street wouldn't have been in a position to put the country into a recession. You want to use the power of government to force your morality on others. That was part of problem and what eventually led to the housing meltdown.

    Hey, look at you doing things. Nice job. I mean, it’s garbage but you’re getting better at this. I give you credit for that one.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Did I quote your post and claim that’s what you said? Who was I talking to? If I have a problem with something you wrote I’ll let you know.

    Some of you need to learn the difference between when I’m talking to Race and when I’m talking to you.
    Yes, you referred to me and said what I “seem to think”. Sounds like you were letting me know you had a problem with what I said. So fuck off.

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.


    I didn’t even @you Mike. Don’t worry about it.
    What part of fuck off did you miss?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    If you have a problem I suggest you read again what he said.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.

    He doesn't say that the role of government is to be used as a vehicle for you to force your values on others. If Wall Street has harmed you then government has a role in addressing that. It's not government's job to arm you with a club simply because you hate capitalism and want to punish successful people.

    Now would you care to address your belief that people can't have sex without having children?

    I’m not enforcing any values. The people on Wall Street sent this country into a recession. The other people in this country need protection from that. Do you disagree that the recession was harmful to the average American? I’d love to hear you make that case. Otherwise, your standard is the government needs to protect me from them.
    Without the government that you love so much Wall Street wouldn't have been in a position to put the country into a recession. You want to use the power of government to force your morality on others. That was part of problem and what eventually led to the housing meltdown.

    Hey, look at you doing things. Nice job. I mean, it’s garbage but you’re getting better at this. I give you credit for that one.
    Yeah it’s “garbage” that’s why you failed to lay a glove on it.
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800

    USMChawk said:

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    Wow, you got triggered in a hurry. Do you disagree with what I said or are you emotionally reacting because I’m being callous? It’s a big, cold, brutal world out there and I tire of the leftist victim mentality wanting to tear down the very system that protects them from that reality. The system isn’t perfect but it doesn’t need an overhaul, it needs a tune up. Our politicians won’t do it because they need to pit us against each other for votes. Term limits would solve some of that.
    There’s literally nothing “emotional” in that post. You said something really stupid and can’t defend it so now youve resorted to attacking me for being triggered. Predictable.
    It reads angsty but I’ll allow you the Hondo defense and you can claim that what you wrote is not what you meant.

    Care to elaborate on what I said that you found so stupid?