Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The perfect encapsulation of the leftist mind.

135

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,829 Founders Club

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Free college is meaningless to the kid who dropped out at 14
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    I miss you, Race.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah, we live in a world where it's just not possible to have sex without having children.



  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.

    Why did his mother have a child she couldn't afford to raise and where is the father in this equation?

    The surest way to make sure you and your children don't grow up living in poverty is for you and your partner to get married before you have kids.

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited January 2019

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    If you have a problem I suggest you read again what he said.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.

    He doesn't say that the role of government is to be used as a vehicle for you to force your values on others. If Wall Street has harmed you then government has a role in addressing that. It's not government's job to arm you with a club simply because you hate capitalism and want to punish successful people.

    Now would you care to address your belief that people can't have sex without having children?

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter

    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.

    Living wage? My question for you Marxists is how much of your current income did you donate to give others a living wage? I'll bet it's zero. Given your beliefs a small apartment in a shitty neighborhood is all you need. If you are living above that downsize and give it away. It's what you want. You just expect everyone else to pay for it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited January 2019
    Sledog said:

    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.

    Living wage? My question for you Marxists is how much of your current income did you donate to give others a living wage? I'll bet it's zero. Given your beliefs a small apartment in a shitty neighborhood is all you need. If you are living above that downsize and give it away. It's what you want. You just expect everyone else to pay for it.
    You'll notice that CD who claims he is against free loaders and people who can't hack it in today's economy never has anything to say against these people who believe that government should set some kind of "living wage" that businesses must pay.
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800

    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    That’s great. Finally, common ground. Where do you want to start? Wall Street? The EPA? Let’s just start throwing regulations out there, I mean that is, according to you, the governments role.
    Again you want to use other people's money, and or the muscle of the government to force your values on others.

    Well, that’s the role of the government. And I didn’t say it @USMChawk did. And @Swaye said “well said” and @RaceBannon threw a chin out there.

    If you have a problem with that, I suggest you stop quoting me and take it up with them.
    Wow, you got triggered in a hurry. Do you disagree with what I said or are you emotionally reacting because I’m being callous? It’s a big, cold, brutal world out there and I tire of the leftist victim mentality wanting to tear down the very system that protects them from that reality. The system isn’t perfect but it doesn’t need an overhaul, it needs a tune up. Our politicians won’t do it because they need to pit us against each other for votes. Term limits would solve some of that.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    Fuck off. That doesn’t say way APAG said it did. That’s quite the “gotcha” you have there. Don’t fuck AND have kids you can’t support. Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit. Got it.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,829 Founders Club
    Experts agree that a home with two dads is better than one mom
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    The word AND is important.

    But dipshit Hondo can’t fucking figure it out.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,042
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    “There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right,” @AOC says in response to criticism that she’s made factual errors.

    https://cbsn.ws/2GYii3B

    And of course, she is the arbiter of what is "morally right." Stealing the labor of people who earned it and giving it to those who didn't earn it is "morally right." There isn't a despot who ever lived or a Brown shirted fascist who supported them who didn't believe that what they were doing was "morally right."

    Who cares about the facts when you're "morally right." Words Hondo obviously lives by.

    The Bible says don't give a man a fish, teach him to fish.

    So cut da welfare wagon off.

    It's morally right.

    Amirite?

    She still has a nice rack but is dumber than a rock on what comes out of her mouff. It would serve a better purpose to suck on throbbers instead as the good lord intended.
    Where is the teaching them to fish part? You got the part of not giving them a fish down but like you said it’s teach them how to fish. If you have ideas on a program designed to help welfare recipients by “teaching them how to fish” and eliminating welfar I’d love to hear it. I actually think that’s something that could get a lot of support if it’s good.

    Or we’re you just being an asshole, spewing a not at all thought out point because it sounded good in your tiny little brain?
    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities rather than to say fuck it, you get PAID by having more kids and don’t let anyone tell you your situation is your fault. You’re a victim after all
    This is your quote DaBoner. You don't say statistically until you get called out. Embarrassing.
    So? That’s what I meant. What’s your point?

    Don’t have kids as a single mom. Finish school. Have two parents raise the kids. Don’t commit crimes.

    Statistically that’s the best chance to not be poor. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    I want people to proposer, you want people dependent.
    I want people to be free to have their values guide their life. You want to force your values on others.

    BTW I know several high school drop outs that make a shit ton more money than you.
    You want people to have the freedom to live their lives, according to their own values and choices, but to be free of the consequences of doing so. My Libertarian slant means I’m all for letting you do all the drugs you want, have as many bastard children as you can, and forego your education to work that McDonalds gig. I just don’t want to pay for your choices. You pay for your kids, you pay for your rehab, you pay for your hospital visits and you pay for your drugs.

    The role of government is to protect you from me, and vice versa, it’s not to protect you from yourself.
    I just came.

  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    The word AND is important.

    But dipshit Hondo can’t fucking figure it out.
    Oh wait. Now you care about reading comprehension after fighting for days about what a hate crime means. Ok!

    BTW I know exactly what you meant but it's funny to watch you get pissed at what you do in a daily basis.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Yeah. That’s a bad way.

    Thanks for the input though.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2019
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    The word AND is important.

    But dipshit Hondo can’t fucking figure it out.
    Oh wait. Now you care about reading comprehension after fighting for days about what a hate crime means. Ok!

    BTW I know exactly what you meant but it's funny to watch you get pissed at what you do in a daily basis.
    You’re bizarre





































































    Ok!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    So you really believe that people having kids out of wedlock are doing so because they don't know where babies come from and they don't have easy access to birth control?

    Explain to me how you could of had out of wedlock birth rates that were just a tiny fraction of what they are today back in the 1950s when few schools even taught sex ed of any kind and access to birth control was much more restricted than it is today? Where is it in America today that people don't have easy access to birth control?
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    USMChawk said:

    dflea said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Well, Damone seems to think we can teach people to stop fucking. If we can get people to stop having sex, we should definitely be able to get them to read.

    Yeah....because that’s what I said....

    JFC
    Yes. Actually. DaBoner doesn't like his own words.

    I’m for teaching people not to fuck and have kids they can’t support. And to get married if you want kids . And having two parents raise the kids. My idea is to hammer that in schools and in the communities
    You can interpret that your way or you can interpret it to mean, teach people to have sex without having kids. That’s how I interpreted it.

    You of all people should have grace, when it comes to ambiguity.
    Withholding valid sex ed in favor of abstinence only sex ed and not providing easy access to birth control is a curious way to accomplish this.
    Where did I advocate for that? My girls both took health (sex Ed) in HS and we (their parents) also discussed it with them. Shockingly, we are heavily involved in their upbringing and they are good kids who will be productive citizens. It’s a foreign concept, I know.
    Where did I say you did?

    The GOP are champions of abstinence only sex ed. It's fucking stupid, but it seems to be ok to accept idiocy from the GOP around here while the Dems idiocy is grounds for declaring a national emergency.

    I tip my hat to you for being engaged with your kids' upbringing. They're already ahead of the game because of that.

    PS - Fuck off, Gaybob. I wasn't fucking talking to you.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter

    El oh fucking El.

    The poster child for liberal nonsense. It is a liberals right to never be taught common sense, decency, facts of success and personal responsibility but it everyone else's responsibility to pay for the libs who want to fail using their own made up "values to guide their life".

    An interesting opinion coming from a liberal who's party espouses teaching liberally revised history, having cross dressing men read to grade school children, forcing feeding children the idea that transsexuals are normal and blocking Conservatives from having a voice on campuses all across the country.

    I love your brain. Stay.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter

    If it’s all about giving kids the best chance for success why aren’t we paying for them to go to college?

    Because MOST kids don't belong on college campuses, as we can plainly see everyday. MOST kids need job skills and job training, not to be endlessly pondering what future trauma Jack will endure after he switches his anatomy to Jill.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    You know what would have been meaningful to him? His mother not having to work two jobs because neither would pay her a living wage.

    Living wage? My question for you Marxists is how much of your current income did you donate to give others a living wage? I'll bet it's zero. Given your beliefs a small apartment in a shitty neighborhood is all you need. If you are living above that downsize and give it away. It's what you want. You just expect everyone else to pay for it.
    You'll notice that CD who claims he is against free loaders and people who can't hack it in today's economy never has anything to say against these people who believe that government should set some kind of "living wage" that businesses must pay.
    Because CD is a classic projector extraordinaire.