Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sa'Vell Smalls, 6* 2020 BUCK, Seattle (Kennedy), WA (SIGNED)
Comments
-
Each season has an impact, some more than others, but do you think that the biggest competition for him, which is Bama, will have any drop off in 2019?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now. -
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
-
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor. -
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
HRYK - if we are 12-0, we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
If we are 12-0, we are bemoaning Bush not throwing to Hunter Bryant in the Pac 12 championship game vs a 6-6 Utah team, only for us to win after Fuller throws an INT on a trick play, but Bryant forces a fumble from the returner and Ahmed scores the td on the scoop to win 6-5 on account of a Peyton Henry blocked XP returned for 2 and a Yoooooot FG from 69 yards out.Sources said:
HRYK - if we are 12-0, we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.
THEN we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit. -
Fair point. Hangover is strong today.jhfstyle24 said:
If we are 12-0, we are bemoaning Bush not throwing to Hunter Bryant in the Pac 12 championship game vs a 6-6 Utah team, only for us to win after Fuller throws an INT on a trick play, but Bryant forces a fumble from the returner and Ahmed scores the td on the scoop to win 6-5 on account of a Peyton Henry blocked XP returned for 2 and a Yoooooot FG from 69 yards out.Sources said:
HRYK - if we are 12-0, we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance.
THEN we're in the playoff and losing to Clemson after nearly battling back from a 3 TD deficit. -
disagreeStrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
Fucker was over by halftime, so I threw caution to the wind and drank until the bars closed last night. Painful morning, but all done to demonstrate my obscene and retarded commitment to my alma mater's football program, in order to compel Smalls to UW.
If blackmail is necessary, here it is: Come to UW, Smalls, or this desperate alum will drink himself to death. Who wants that on their conscience? -
I rarely WTF posts, but this one did it.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
Can’t flag a moderator postSwaye said:
I rarely WTF posts, but this one did it.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
Respect your elders.WeakarmCobra said:
Can’t flag a moderator postSwaye said:
I rarely WTF posts, but this one did it.StrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
Trade Browning with Eason this past season and UW likely goes 13-0. They can absolutely do it next season. Winning matters all the time. Smalls hasn't made up his mind and isn't even close to doing so. He'll make a late decision. An undefeated regular season and another playoff run for UW would definitely help their case and make it more likely they close him. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a fucking idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
disagreeStrongArmCobra said:
You don't know that @dnc bitchHillsboroDuck said:
We aren't going 13-0 next seasonStrongArmCobra said:
WINNING FUCKING MATTERS! Your shit is fucking stupid and you sound retarded. If UW goes 13-0 next season and gets back to the playoffs that will absolutely increase their chances of landing Smalls. Shut the fuck up you stupid idiot.HillsboroDuck said:
Right, it was an extreme season in which USC went from conference champs to a losing season, extreme enough that it put the coaches future in doubt.StrongArmCobra said:
No, that's stupid. If that was the case, Latu would be going to SC. SC's season absolutely negatively affected their 2019 recruiting class. Latu is SC's equivalent of Smalls. He was their #1 overall target for the 2019 class. He grew up an SC fan. Like I said, if SC had gone undefeated, Latu would not be going to UW.HillsboroDuck said:
It's not nonsense, @TierbsHsotBoobs was dialed in on this and his theory has proven itself to be true time and time again over the last decade plus since he first floated it.StrongArmCobra said:
Um no that's nonsense. The 2019 season will definitely be a factor. You don't think USC going 5-7 this season helped UW close Laiatu Latu? You think Latu would be going to UW if SC had gone 12-0?HillsboroDuck said:
He's not choosing a school based on how they play in 2019. Recruiting lag theory says the on the field impressions have been made for 2020, the impact of the 2019 season will be on the 2021 signing class.StrongArmCobra said:We still have a chance if the new uni's are dope and UW levels up on the field with Eason.
It's in the recruiters' hands now.
UW going undefeated next season and getting back to the playoffs would absolutely help them potentially sign Smalls. Winning always matters for recruiting and the more games you win before it's time for a recruit to sign, the better.
There's a reason UW's best classes were 18 and 19, not 17, even though 16 was our best season.
These kids have basically made their minds up about these teams on the field. Sure something at the extreme margins could shift some things like is UW goes 15-0 or has a losing season but baring that, there's not going to be a huge difference between how our 2020 class looks if we win 8 or if we win 12. That on field difference will greatly impact the 2021 class though.
For guys who make their college decisions closer to Signing Day, which Smalls will, the season that they just witnessed by the teams they are considering is always a factor.
UW isn't going to vary nearly that far from expectations/previous performance. -
Making room for a certain high school coach...? -
Dennison is not a coach they wanted to lose.Domicillo said:
Making room for a certain high school coach...? -
They didn’t want to lose any of their defensive coaches, but if they did, they have a replacement ready to go.StrongArmCobra said:
Dennison is not a coach they wanted to lose.Domicillo said:
Making room for a certain high school coach...? -
Doubtful. Would be an obvious low down trick by them if they did so. Don't think it would jive well with his parents.Domicillo said:
They didn’t want to lose any of their defensive coaches, but if they did, they have a replacement ready to go.StrongArmCobra said:
Dennison is not a coach they wanted to lose.Domicillo said:
Making room for a certain high school coach...? -
Dude, romar effectStrongArmCobra said:
Doubtful. Would be an obvious low down trick by them if they did so. Don't think it would jive well with his parents.Domicillo said:
They didn’t want to lose any of their defensive coaches, but if they did, they have a replacement ready to go.StrongArmCobra said:
Dennison is not a coach they wanted to lose.Domicillo said:
Making room for a certain high school coach...? -
Not talented to the level UW needs. Who is going to develop into this "very good back"?dhdawg said:
yeah that's the point. it's not 2003-2014 anymore...TommySQC said:God you fucks are stupid.
Do not count on a player to develop until he has. Has 2003-2014 not meant anything to you fucks?
We're not relying on individuals to develop. that's FS... There is a number of talented RB's, and it is likely that one will develop into a very good player.
Ahmed? No.
McGrew? No.
Pleasant? No.
Newton? LOL
-
Can Joey Thomas coach wide receivers?!?
-
I thought he couldn't come here due to PTSD?EsophagealFeces said:Can Joey Thomas coach wide receivers?!?
-
Roofs got a piece on Smalls. Lots of generic stuff including his thoughts about the rose bowl and the team matching up well with Ohio State besides a few dropped balls/missed plays. Gonna release his top ten soon, UW will be in there. Hopes to take visits in the spring and mentions he wants to go somewhere where he can win cause he hasn’t done much of that at Garfield. Best thing I’ve read in a while though is this bit from Roof though.
“One thing that he’s really thinking about right now, aside from the football aspect, is life after football. Smalls said he wants to have the business side of his career in tact and the local support of wherever he goes to school.”
WAM! -
Lots of hot chat going down in the WAM!
-
Romar hired a kid's dad.WeakarmCobra said:
Dude, romar effectStrongArmCobra said:
Doubtful. Would be an obvious low down trick by them if they did so. Don't think it would jive well with his parents.Domicillo said:
They didn’t want to lose any of their defensive coaches, but if they did, they have a replacement ready to go.StrongArmCobra said:
Dennison is not a coach they wanted to lose.Domicillo said:
Making room for a certain high school coach...?
What's that? He wants to go somewhere he can win? I'm sure how many wins UW has next season doesn't matter at all to him then right @HillsboroDuckDomicillo said:Roofs got a piece on Smalls. Lots of generic stuff including his thoughts about the rose bowl and the team matching up well with Ohio State besides a few dropped balls/missed plays. Gonna release his top ten soon, UW will be in there. Hopes to take visits in the spring and mentions he wants to go somewhere where he can win cause he hasn’t done much of that at Garfield. Best thing I’ve read in a while though is this bit from Roof though.
“One thing that he’s really thinking about right now, aside from the football aspect, is life after football. Smalls said he wants to have the business side of his career in tact and the local support of wherever he goes to school.”
WAM! -
Hmmnn... I think anyone can write recruiting pieces nowadays.Domicillo said:Roofs got a piece on Smalls. Lots of generic stuff including his thoughts about the rose bowl and the team matching up well with Ohio State besides a few dropped balls/missed plays. Gonna release his top ten soon, UW will be in there. Hopes to take visits in the spring and mentions he wants to go somewhere where he can win cause he hasn’t done much of that at Garfield. Best thing I’ve read in a while though is this bit from Roof though.
“One thing that he’s really thinking about right now, aside from the football aspect, is life after football. Smalls said he wants to have the business side of his career in tact and the local support of wherever he goes to school.”
WAM!
"wants local support of wherever he goes..." really now?
As opposed to "I just wanna go to a school where I can make the NFL money and fuck everything else..."
10.95? -
Cortch Dennison was the OGBBK. Clearly a real mind for the game. Petersen might want to start connecting with past legends or certain relatives of legends to fill out the staff.
