Update on Pete's 2016- 18 record again Elite, Equal and No Talent
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/
Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)
0-3 (.000%)
*2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites
Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)
8-5 (.615%)
*All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.
Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)
24-1 (.960%)
Comments
-
So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.
-
Peterman’s billy pulpit.YellowSnow said:Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/
Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)
0-3 (.000%)
*2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites
Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)
8-5 (.615%)
*All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.
Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)
24-1 (.960%) -
You want to start every other year with a guaranteed loss?TTJ said:So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.
-
Since we are currently sitting at 20 composite it seems like teams 15-25 is more "like us".YellowSnow said:Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/
Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)
0-3 (.000%)
*2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites
Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)
8-5 (.615%)
*All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.
Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)
24-1 (.960%)
At 10-15 you get teams like Florida, Penn State, Oklahoma, and Norte Dame
At 25-30 you get teams like Michigan State and North Carolina
Its a massive tallent difference between Oklahoma and North Carolina, seems odd to include both Oklahoma and UNC in the "like us" category.
What occurs when you restrict the "equal to us" more tightly? like +- 5 -
Petersen 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1
Sarkisian 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1*
* in fairness, Petersen had to rebound from sanctions and Owen 12. Sarkisian just had to show up and coach Petermans recruits -
I can get behind this logic, but for the sake of this exercise was trying to limit to 3 groups, hence the +/- 10. Perhaps a better way to go is +/- 1.00 of our composite of 87.25. This still included Pedo, Auburn, Furd, Oregon, UCLA. ASU is just slightly more than 1.0 below us.Houhusky said:
Since we are currently sitting at 20 composite it seems like teams 15-25 is more "like us".YellowSnow said:Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/
Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)
0-3 (.000%)
*2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites
Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)
8-5 (.615%)
*All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.
Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)
24-1 (.960%)
At 10-15 you get teams like Florida, Penn State, Oklahoma, and Norte Dame
At 25-30 you get teams like Michigan State and North Carolina
Its a massive tallent difference between Oklahoma and North Carolina, seems odd to include both Oklahoma and UNC in the "like us" category.
What occurs when you restrict the "equal to us" more tightly? like +- 5 -
Holiday bowls!sarktastic said:Petersen 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1
Sarkisian 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1*
* in fairness, Petersen had to rebound from sanctions and Owen 12. Sarkisian just had to show up and coach Petermans recruits -
Is it Time to Worry About Petersen?
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/washingtons-rose-bowl-loss-continues-ugly-narrative-huskies-still-looking-for-signature-win-under-chris-petersen/
Unda preshaw -
Iditotic. Peterman is a good coach against a league of below average coaches
-
So, Peterman outcoaches below average coaches when they have similar levels of talent?Pitchfork51 said:Iditotic. Peterman is a good coach against a league of below average coaches
I knew I liked Herm for some reason.






