Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Update on Pete's 2016- 18 record again Elite, Equal and No Talent

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,692 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/

Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)

0-3 (.000%)

*2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites

Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)

8-5 (.615%)

*All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.

Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)

24-1 (.960%)
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Homebrew_DawgHomebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,650
    YellowSnow said:

    Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
    https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/

    Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)

    0-3 (.000%)

    *2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites

    Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)

    8-5 (.615%)

    *All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.

    Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)

    24-1 (.960%)

    Peterman’s billy pulpit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,221 Swaye's Wigwam
    TTJ said:

    So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.

    You want to start every other year with a guaranteed loss?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Petersen 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1

    Sarkisian 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1*



















    * in fairness, Petersen had to rebound from sanctions and Owen 12. Sarkisian just had to show up and coach Petermans recruits
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,692 Founders Club
    Houhusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Update here on Pete’s 2016- 18 record against teams that are per 247 Talent Composite vastly superior to us, roughly equal to us, and significantly worse than us.
    https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/

    Elite Talent (i.e., more than 10 spots ahead of us in the 247 Talent Composite)

    0-3 (.000%)

    *2 of these losses were at neutral bowl sites

    Roughly Equal Talent (within 10 spots north or south of us- e.g., Auburn, Penn St, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford)

    8-5 (.615%)

    *All 5 losses were on the road or in neutral site bowl games.

    Little Sisters of the Pour (i.e., more than 10 sports below us in Talent Composite)

    24-1 (.960%)

    Since we are currently sitting at 20 composite it seems like teams 15-25 is more "like us".

    At 10-15 you get teams like Florida, Penn State, Oklahoma, and Norte Dame

    At 25-30 you get teams like Michigan State and North Carolina

    Its a massive tallent difference between Oklahoma and North Carolina, seems odd to include both Oklahoma and UNC in the "like us" category.

    What occurs when you restrict the "equal to us" more tightly? like +- 5
    I can get behind this logic, but for the sake of this exercise was trying to limit to 3 groups, hence the +/- 10. Perhaps a better way to go is +/- 1.00 of our composite of 87.25. This still included Pedo, Auburn, Furd, Oregon, UCLA. ASU is just slightly more than 1.0 below us.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,916
    sarktastic said:

    Petersen 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1

    Sarkisian 5 year Bowl win total @ Washington = 1*



















    * in fairness, Petersen had to rebound from sanctions and Owen 12. Sarkisian just had to show up and coach Petermans recruits

    Holiday bowls!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Is it Time to Worry About Petersen?

    https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/washingtons-rose-bowl-loss-continues-ugly-narrative-huskies-still-looking-for-signature-win-under-chris-petersen/




    Unda preshaw
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,296
    Iditotic. Peterman is a good coach against a league of below average coaches
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,300
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Iditotic. Peterman is a good coach against a league of below average coaches

    So, Peterman outcoaches below average coaches when they have similar levels of talent?

    I knew I liked Herm for some reason.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Scheduling Hawaii and Eastern should help with the 10 wins
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    TTJ said:

    doogville said:

    TTJ said:

    So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.

    You want to start every other year with a guaranteed loss?
    Since coming to Seattle, Pete is 27-7 at home. Including 19-1 over the last three years. I want to host some bluebloods in Husky Stadium.
    This is a really excellent poont. Obviously the most likely way to start winning some “big games”. Take the step, build the confidence, keep moving forward.

    When do we host someone worth a shit?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    DeepDawg said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    TTJ said:

    doogville said:

    TTJ said:

    So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.

    You want to start every other year with a guaranteed loss?
    Since coming to Seattle, Pete is 27-7 at home. Including 19-1 over the last three years. I want to host some bluebloods in Husky Stadium.
    This is a really excellent poont. Obviously the most likely way to start winning some “big games”. Take the step, build the confidence, keep moving forward.

    When do we host someone worth a shit?
    Michigan in 2020 and Ohio State in 2024. Provided neither of those big 10 pussies back out like Wisconsin did
    2020 will be special!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Fuck I hope Gee Scott Jr is still at Ohio State in 2024.










    Who am I kidding, he won't even sign there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.