Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
US envoy in ISIS fight, Brett McGurk, resigns over US withdrawal from Syria
Comments
-
Fuck off you god damn idiot. “My” border wall. You’re such a fucking partisan hack you can’t wrap your head around the possibility that someone can’t be. Where did I say I wanted a wall? I said that many many times demcrats enthusiastically voted for physical boarder security. They piss away more money every day on stupid shit, so it’s not a money issue. It’s 100% a trump issue. Stop being a fuck head. The Senate needs 60 votes to pass it. So it isn’t up to senate Republicans.2001400ex said:
Your last sentence is the exact point. Both sides do it. So I always chuckle when the first response on this thread is whining about hypocrisy.MikeDamone said:
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
Again your border wall. Democrat politicians are not saying we don't need border security. They are saying that building the wall is not an effective use of money. BTW. Republican politicians are saying the exact same thing or else they would have passed funding the last 2 years. The only reason Republicans in the house voted for it is because they knew it wouldn't pass the Senate and they wanted to point the finger at Democrats. -
Nice rant. Yes you don't care about the border wall at all.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off you god damn idiot. “My” border wall. You’re such a fucking partisan hack you can’t wrap your head around the possibility that someone can’t be. Where did I say I wanted a wall? I said that many many times demcrats enthusiastically voted for physical boarder security. They piss away more money every day on stupid shit, so it’s not a money issue. It’s 100% a trump issue. Stop being a fuck head. The Senate needs 60 votes to pass it. So it isn’t up to senate Republicans.2001400ex said:
Your last sentence is the exact point. Both sides do it. So I always chuckle when the first response on this thread is whining about hypocrisy.MikeDamone said:
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
Again your border wall. Democrat politicians are not saying we don't need border security. They are saying that building the wall is not an effective use of money. BTW. Republican politicians are saying the exact same thing or else they would have passed funding the last 2 years. The only reason Republicans in the house voted for it is because they knew it wouldn't pass the Senate and they wanted to point the finger at Democrats.
That being said, no they don't need 60 votes. They have invoked the nuclear option for other things They could do the same on this issue. Are you that ignorant? -
2001400ex said:
Nice rant. Yes you don't care about the border wall at all.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off you god damn idiot. “My” border wall. You’re such a fucking partisan hack you can’t wrap your head around the possibility that someone can’t be. Where did I say I wanted a wall? I said that many many times demcrats enthusiastically voted for physical boarder security. They piss away more money every day on stupid shit, so it’s not a money issue. It’s 100% a trump issue. Stop being a fuck head. The Senate needs 60 votes to pass it. So it isn’t up to senate Republicans.2001400ex said:
Your last sentence is the exact point. Both sides do it. So I always chuckle when the first response on this thread is whining about hypocrisy.MikeDamone said:
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
Again your border wall. Democrat politicians are not saying we don't need border security. They are saying that building the wall is not an effective use of money. BTW. Republican politicians are saying the exact same thing or else they would have passed funding the last 2 years. The only reason Republicans in the house voted for it is because they knew it wouldn't pass the Senate and they wanted to point the finger at Democrats.
That being said, Jake Browning sucksno they don't need 60 votes. They have invoked the nuclear option for other things They could do the same on this issue.Are you that ignorant? -
Fuck if he is.Dude61 said:Trump is doing what is said he would do during his campaign and May this year.
He's grubbing for tax money to pay for what he said Mexico would pay for.
It's like promising to buy someone a car, and then telling them they have to make the payments. Your cock gobbling knows no bounds.
-
Why would I want a wall when I want more cheap labor here? Try to keep up dip shit. Borders aren’t on my list of issues. Fuck you’re stupid. You make assumptions and can’t fucking read.2001400ex said:
Nice rant. Yes you don't care about the border wall at all.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off you god damn idiot. “My” border wall. You’re such a fucking partisan hack you can’t wrap your head around the possibility that someone can’t be. Where did I say I wanted a wall? I said that many many times demcrats enthusiastically voted for physical boarder security. They piss away more money every day on stupid shit, so it’s not a money issue. It’s 100% a trump issue. Stop being a fuck head. The Senate needs 60 votes to pass it. So it isn’t up to senate Republicans.2001400ex said:
Your last sentence is the exact point. Both sides do it. So I always chuckle when the first response on this thread is whining about hypocrisy.MikeDamone said:
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
Again your border wall. Democrat politicians are not saying we don't need border security. They are saying that building the wall is not an effective use of money. BTW. Republican politicians are saying the exact same thing or else they would have passed funding the last 2 years. The only reason Republicans in the house voted for it is because they knew it wouldn't pass the Senate and they wanted to point the finger at Democrats.
That being said, no they don't need 60 votes. They have invoked the nuclear option for other things They could do the same on this issue. Are you that ignorant?
Seems like democrats are the only ones who have such little regard for governing in a bi partisan way that the nuclear option would be used. Of course, you see nothing wrong with using it. Hack. -
I'm for whatever makes the libs crydflea said:
Fuck if he is.Dude61 said:Trump is doing what is said he would do during his campaign and May this year.
He's grubbing for tax money to pay for what he said Mexico would pay for.
It's like promising to buy someone a car, and then telling them they have to make the payments. Your cock gobbling knows no bounds. -
I like to whine about people projecting beliefs on me. Then proceed to project beliefs on someone else. Is what I like to do.MikeDamone said:
Why would I want a wall when I want more cheap labor here? Try to keep up dip shit. Borders aren’t on my list of issues. Fuck you’re stupid. You make assumptions and can’t fucking read.2001400ex said:
Nice rant. Yes you don't care about the border wall at all.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off you god damn idiot. “My” border wall. You’re such a fucking partisan hack you can’t wrap your head around the possibility that someone can’t be. Where did I say I wanted a wall? I said that many many times demcrats enthusiastically voted for physical boarder security. They piss away more money every day on stupid shit, so it’s not a money issue. It’s 100% a trump issue. Stop being a fuck head. The Senate needs 60 votes to pass it. So it isn’t up to senate Republicans.2001400ex said:
Your last sentence is the exact point. Both sides do it. So I always chuckle when the first response on this thread is whining about hypocrisy.MikeDamone said:
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
Again your border wall. Democrat politicians are not saying we don't need border security. They are saying that building the wall is not an effective use of money. BTW. Republican politicians are saying the exact same thing or else they would have passed funding the last 2 years. The only reason Republicans in the house voted for it is because they knew it wouldn't pass the Senate and they wanted to point the finger at Democrats.
That being said, no they don't need 60 votes. They have invoked the nuclear option for other things They could do the same on this issue. Are you that ignorant?
Seems like democrats are the only ones who have such little regard for governing in a bi partisan way that the nuclear option would be used. Of course, you see nothing wrong with using it. Hack. -
I agree; for politicians and partisan hacks, it's entirely partisan.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
What's funny is watching people try to paint that hypocrisy on people who disagree with Trump. You can be for the withdrawal of troops in Iraq and for keeping troops in Syria. It's almost like there's different fact patterns in each instance.greenblood said:Insinceredawg was for troop withdrawal up until Trump was. Now he’s pro military. Good to know. Shill...
But if you want to do Simple mind syndrome. How many people screamed about Obama pulling troops from Iraq but wanting troops pulled now?
You can be for Iraq troop withdrawal because Obama did it and against Syria troop withdrawal because trump is doing it.
Bottom line is it’s 100% partasin. No one gives a shit until it’s the other party making the decision then they automatically take the other side. Pelosi and Schumer would never in a million years publically criticize Obama if he did this. And the facts bear that out.
Democrats happily voted to fund physical boarder security many times in the past 20 years. Into the multi billions. And they thought it was a good idea and no one even questioned it. Now it’s so racist and immoral that they can’t possibly vote for it. What they can’t do is give Trump a win on a campaign promise. Same with troops in the Middle East.
And before you shit your panties, I can find examples of when Republicans did the same thing with Obama.
I've always been of the belief that we're waisting time over there and have been partial to views expressed that the region is too tribal and backwards to hope for any real change. My view on this point is not affected by party. I've been accused of being an establishment Republican, which is probably mostly right, and I still thought W was mistaken in his foreign policy on the Middle East. HWB pretty much blamed his boy's advisors for failing him on this point. I agree with HWB. I guess it's true: I'm an establishment Republican. -
I'm neither here or there on the subject. Trumps the guy that gets to decide.
