PM to Coker
They used to be deflating.
Then they were funny for a little while, kinda like when your buddy plays a joke on you: “OK, you got me.”
Now they’re just stupid.
Comments
-
They are ALWAYS funny.
-
I think following the Dawgman model instead of this model will work out great
What could go wrong? -
Who’s calling for that?RaceBannon said:I think following the Dawgman model instead of this model will work out great
What could go wrong? -
As long as I can transfer my Hardcore-husky-board account to the new site I don't care. I have worked Hard for these chincredibles.
-
I just want one person with a press pass who knows what the fuck is happening in the program
-
Plz @CokeGreaterThanPepsiAEB said:I just want one person with a press pass who knows what the fuck is happening in the program
-
You say that as if it isnt that way by design.AEB said:I just want one person with a press pass who knows what the fuck is happening in the program
-
Fake WOOFs are part of HH culture at this point. They’re basically just an extension of Grundles highly successful and massively important Twetters campaign.
Like our poasters, some are better than others and some we could easily do without. But the eclectic mix is part of our charm.
If you hate fake WOOFs you hate HH.
I stand with fake WOOFs. -
I appreciate your support.HillsboroDuck said:Fake WOOFs are part of HH culture at this point. They’re basically just an extension of Grundles highly successful and massively important Twetters campaign.
Like our poasters, some are better than others and some we could easily do without. But the eclectic mix is part of our charm.
I stand with fake WOOFs. -
Pretty sure he said "I stand with fake woofs." Not "I stand with faggott Doogs"Crawfish said:
I appreciate your support.HillsboroDuck said:Fake WOOFs are part of HH culture at this point. They’re basically just an extension of Grundles highly successful and massively important Twetters campaign.
Like our poasters, some are better than others and some we could easily do without. But the eclectic mix is part of our charm.
I stand with fake WOOFs. -
Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.HillsboroDuck said:Fake WOOFs are part of HH culture at this point. They’re basically just an extension of Grundles highly successful and massively important Twetters campaign.
Like our poasters, some are better than others and some we could easily do without. But the eclectic mix is part of our charm.
If you hate fake WOOFs you hate HH.
I stand with fake WOOFs. -
So if I'm reading @Passion correctly, he wants to, Make Woofs Great Again!
-
Why doesn't anyone ask me how I feel?
-
-
Thank you for asking @Doog_de_Jour .Doog_de_Jour said:
I am feeling great, but also sad that my favorite recruit is going to be a domer. Given my handle was an attempt at being the OG fake woof (albeit a failed one due to my extreme laziness), I stand with the fake woofs. Also, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or so I am told. -
Sounds like some of you can’t handle the ups and downs of fake woofs.
-
I stand with Passion in this one, I guess. It's not that I hate the fake woofs. They're just not funny. They weren't the first 23 times.
-
hurtful.Ice_Holmvik said:
Pretty sure he said "I stand with fake woofs." Not "I stand with faggott Doogs"Crawfish said:
I appreciate your support.HillsboroDuck said:Fake WOOFs are part of HH culture at this point. They’re basically just an extension of Grundles highly successful and massively important Twetters campaign.
Like our poasters, some are better than others and some we could easily do without. But the eclectic mix is part of our charm.
I stand with fake WOOFs. -
I wonder if they'll crack down on impersonation handles. Stalin let mine slide, but Mrs. Petersen clearly crosses a line.
