Official Blazers REVENGE season thread
Comments
-
You can, but it only lasts for a year and those guys were drafted within 3 years of each other. So despite GS, it’s hard to juggle those balls for more than 2 or 3 years before having to have an absolute fire sale. Durant took the ring chaser discount with GS. However, neither Westbrook nor Harden would dream of such a thing. Nor would Durant in Seattle, snicker, I mean OKC when He was there.allpurpleallgold said:
You can go over the cap to sign players you have Bird rights on.salemcoog said:
I like to call a GM who drafted Durant, Westbrook and Harden retarded because He couldn’t keep them together. It’s how I show that I don’t know Shit about how salary caps work.RaceBannon said:What we don't know is what if Durant and Westbrook and Harden had played in Seattle with a non retarded GM who kept them together
You can win titles in Portland or Seattle. It's hard anywhere. And its harder now when you have to draft 18 year olds instead of 22 year olds -
You can go over the cap as much as you want for as long as you want as long as you’re signing guys you have Bird rights on. There’s no one year rule.salemcoog said:
You can, but it only lasts for a year and those guys were drafted within 3 years of each other. So despite GS, it’s hard to juggle those balls for more than 2 or 3 years before having to have an absolute fire sale. Durant took the ring chaser discount with GS. However, neither Westbrook nor Harden would dream of such a thing. Nor would Durant in Seattle, snicker, I mean OKC when He was there.allpurpleallgold said:
You can go over the cap to sign players you have Bird rights on.salemcoog said:
I like to call a GM who drafted Durant, Westbrook and Harden retarded because He couldn’t keep them together. It’s how I show that I don’t know Shit about how salary caps work.RaceBannon said:What we don't know is what if Durant and Westbrook and Harden had played in Seattle with a non retarded GM who kept them together
You can win titles in Portland or Seattle. It's hard anywhere. And its harder now when you have to draft 18 year olds instead of 22 year olds -
-
Not that Bagley has been bad, but if my Kings selected Doncic they would make the playoffs.
-
At the Clips tonight. First of 4 games in a week even though the next 3 after this are in the 🌹.
Everyone's all optimistic about the bench now. Feels like an L where the wefs scwew us tonight. -
There was a large contingent that felt Durant was far better than Oden based on early hoops analytics.Doogles said:
Embid looks like a great pick because the dice fell in Philly's favor.greenblood said:
Jordan I can understand, but damn... imagine them two on the floor together.RaceBannon said:Portland had Drexler when they went big at a time when you needed a big, to compliment him. 8 years later Jordan won his first title
Durant was 135 pounds with one year of college. Oden, King of the Vikings, was the next big thing
Oden is a bullshit excuse. A lot of people in upper management knew about Oden's foot problems. There were people in the organization that told Prichard that Oden was damaged goods, and he picked him anyways.
Oden was Embid on Steroids. It's revisionist history to the max to say Durant was easily a slam dunk over Oden.
Edit: You could argue Embids injuries were even a bigger red flag than Odens.
I was all in on Durant, as a Sonics fan i was thrilled when Portland took Oden.
And Oden didn't have Embiid's shooting or passing ability. He was a massive force in the middle but much more of an old school center than a new school guy like Embiid. -
What's lost here is that the blazers have had their souls crushed by Shaq so many times they will never pass on a gargantuan center.HillsboroDuck said:
There was a large contingent that felt Durant was far better than Oden based on early hoops analytics.Doogles said:
Embid looks like a great pick because the dice fell in Philly's favor.greenblood said:
Jordan I can understand, but damn... imagine them two on the floor together.RaceBannon said:Portland had Drexler when they went big at a time when you needed a big, to compliment him. 8 years later Jordan won his first title
Durant was 135 pounds with one year of college. Oden, King of the Vikings, was the next big thing
Oden is a bullshit excuse. A lot of people in upper management knew about Oden's foot problems. There were people in the organization that told Prichard that Oden was damaged goods, and he picked him anyways.
Oden was Embid on Steroids. It's revisionist history to the max to say Durant was easily a slam dunk over Oden.
Edit: You could argue Embids injuries were even a bigger red flag than Odens.
I was all in on Durant, as a Sonics fan i was thrilled when Portland took Oden.
And Oden didn't have Embiid's shooting or passing ability. He was a massive force in the middle but much more of an old school center than a new school guy like Embiid. -
Those who ignore the Sam Bowie pick are destined to repeat it.haie said:
What's lost here is that the blazers have had their souls crushed by Shaq so many times they will never pass on a gargantuan center.HillsboroDuck said:
There was a large contingent that felt Durant was far better than Oden based on early hoops analytics.Doogles said:
Embid looks like a great pick because the dice fell in Philly's favor.greenblood said:
Jordan I can understand, but damn... imagine them two on the floor together.RaceBannon said:Portland had Drexler when they went big at a time when you needed a big, to compliment him. 8 years later Jordan won his first title
Durant was 135 pounds with one year of college. Oden, King of the Vikings, was the next big thing
Oden is a bullshit excuse. A lot of people in upper management knew about Oden's foot problems. There were people in the organization that told Prichard that Oden was damaged goods, and he picked him anyways.
Oden was Embid on Steroids. It's revisionist history to the max to say Durant was easily a slam dunk over Oden.
Edit: You could argue Embids injuries were even a bigger red flag than Odens.
I was all in on Durant, as a Sonics fan i was thrilled when Portland took Oden.
And Oden didn't have Embiid's shooting or passing ability. He was a massive force in the middle but much more of an old school center than a new school guy like Embiid. -
Jerome Kersey, Duckworth, Sheed.HillsboroDuck said:
Those who ignore the Sam Bowie pick are destined to repeat it.haie said:
What's lost here is that the blazers have had their souls crushed by Shaq so many times they will never pass on a gargantuan center.HillsboroDuck said:
There was a large contingent that felt Durant was far better than Oden based on early hoops analytics.Doogles said:
Embid looks like a great pick because the dice fell in Philly's favor.greenblood said:
Jordan I can understand, but damn... imagine them two on the floor together.RaceBannon said:Portland had Drexler when they went big at a time when you needed a big, to compliment him. 8 years later Jordan won his first title
Durant was 135 pounds with one year of college. Oden, King of the Vikings, was the next big thing
Oden is a bullshit excuse. A lot of people in upper management knew about Oden's foot problems. There were people in the organization that told Prichard that Oden was damaged goods, and he picked him anyways.
Oden was Embid on Steroids. It's revisionist history to the max to say Durant was easily a slam dunk over Oden.
Edit: You could argue Embids injuries were even a bigger red flag than Odens.
I was all in on Durant, as a Sonics fan i was thrilled when Portland took Oden.
And Oden didn't have Embiid's shooting or passing ability. He was a massive force in the middle but much more of an old school center than a new school guy like Embiid.
Blazer fans have always wanted a team that will fuck you up while winning it all.
Durant looked like he would get broken in half by the all star break. -
How's that worked out for them?haie said:
Jerome Kersey, Duckworth, Sheed.HillsboroDuck said:
Those who ignore the Sam Bowie pick are destined to repeat it.haie said:
What's lost here is that the blazers have had their souls crushed by Shaq so many times they will never pass on a gargantuan center.HillsboroDuck said:
There was a large contingent that felt Durant was far better than Oden based on early hoops analytics.Doogles said:
Embid looks like a great pick because the dice fell in Philly's favor.greenblood said:
Jordan I can understand, but damn... imagine them two on the floor together.RaceBannon said:Portland had Drexler when they went big at a time when you needed a big, to compliment him. 8 years later Jordan won his first title
Durant was 135 pounds with one year of college. Oden, King of the Vikings, was the next big thing
Oden is a bullshit excuse. A lot of people in upper management knew about Oden's foot problems. There were people in the organization that told Prichard that Oden was damaged goods, and he picked him anyways.
Oden was Embid on Steroids. It's revisionist history to the max to say Durant was easily a slam dunk over Oden.
Edit: You could argue Embids injuries were even a bigger red flag than Odens.
I was all in on Durant, as a Sonics fan i was thrilled when Portland took Oden.
And Oden didn't have Embiid's shooting or passing ability. He was a massive force in the middle but much more of an old school center than a new school guy like Embiid.
Blazer fans have always wanted a team that will fuck you up while winning it all.
Durant looked like he would get broken in half by the all star break.





