Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

this is another example

dhdawg
dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
edited January 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
of a game where one team wants to be there and one team doesn't give a shit.
Time for a 8 team playoff at least and scrap everything else.
#fuckingdreckfest
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 188
    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Why would Baylor not want to be in the Fiesta Bowl?

    You play to win the NYD Game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Someone on Equook suggested 16 team playoff lol.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    topdawgnc said:

    Why would Baylor not want to be in the Fiesta Bowl?

    You play to win the NYD Game.

    I would think they would want to be there, but they ain't playing like it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    Stanford
    MSU
    Auburn
    Baylor
    Florida St.
    Bama
    Mizzou
    tOSU

    That'd be some good football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

    First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

    Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

    Third Round ... Natty

    Done. Done. Done.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

    First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

    Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

    Third Round ... Natty

    Done. Done. Done.
    not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    dhdawg said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

    First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

    Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

    Third Round ... Natty

    Done. Done. Done.
    not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference
    Huh?

    So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

    I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

    If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

    Win your division, win your conference ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    topdawgnc said:

    So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

    I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

    If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

    Win your division, win your conference ...

    I, too, hate the NFL wildcards
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    topdawgnc said:

    So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

    I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

    If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

    Win your division, win your conference ...

    I, too, hate the NFL wildcards
    are we talking NFL or college?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    edited January 2014
    topdawgnc said:

    are we talking NFL or college?

    We are talking college, but if you hate non-division/non-conference champs winning the Natty, then do you hate it when Wildcard teams win the SB?

    They're not exactly parallels, more just curiosity here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    topdawgnc said:

    are we talking NFL or college?

    We are talking college, but if you hate non-division/non-conference champs winning the Natty, then do you hate it when Wildcard teams win the SB?

    They're not exactly parallels, more just curiosity here.
    Then keep it to college ... I'm sure there's a NFL bored for you to talk NFL if you'd like.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Should just scrap conferences and bowls altogether, and do a 128 team tournament starting with 4 team groups and a round robin, with the group winners entering a knockout round. That way, we don't have to watch shitty teams play past September.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    edited January 2014
    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

    First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

    Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

    Third Round ... Natty

    Done. Done. Done.
    not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference
    Huh?

    So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

    I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

    If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

    Win your division, win your conference ...
    Why do you hate the 2011 BCS national champions?

    Your conference championship prerequisite sounds great, but it's never actually existed in cfb.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    I hate the offseason.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    Travis Morris said:

    8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



    BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

    Pac-12 champ
    B1G champ
    SEC champ
    Big-12 Champ
    ACC champ
    3 at large bids
    seeding is based on BCS rankings
    4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

    First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

    Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

    Third Round ... Natty

    Done. Done. Done.
    not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference
    Huh?

    So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

    I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

    If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

    Win your division, win your conference ...
    Why do you hate the 2011 BCS national champions?

    Your conference championship prerequisite sounds great, but it's never actually existed in cfb.
    I hate, and do not recognize, the 2011 BCS Champions because it was fucking bullshit.

    Alabama lost to LSU at home ... why should they get to play in the BCS National Championship?

    I get its never existed before.

    But here are some points:

    The super conferences are coming. The B1G is moving everyone that direction.

    Part of playoff push back is the travel length of schedule blah blah blah

    With super conferences why not use those as the play off to get conference champions.

    Just sayin.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    the fact that you don't recognize the 2011 BCS game speaks volumes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    BlowItUp said:

    the fact that you don't recognize the 2011 BCS game speaks volumes.

    Yes, Nick Saban loses sleep over it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.

    The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.

    A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.

    After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Tailgater said:

    Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.

    The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.

    A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.

    After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.

    I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    dhdawg said:

    Tailgater said:

    Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.

    The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.

    A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.

    After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.

    I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do that
    Alabama proved in 2011 the regular season is meaningless ...

    hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    dhdawg said:

    Tailgater said:

    Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.

    The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.

    A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.

    After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.

    I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do that
    Meaningless for whom? You can't mean the student athletes and their fans who next year will be sitting home eagerly anticipating the 4-school play-off which will almost immediately become the Mother of meaninglessness, except for the 4 teams selected.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    a 64 team playoff means washington would've been a playoff team this year. Do u really want that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    Someone already thought of a 64-team playoff

    http://ftw.usatoday.com/2013/12/college-football-playoff-bracket/

    Looks like we'd bow out in the 2nd round, just like in March Madness
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter