this is another example
Comments
-
Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.
The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.
A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.
After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff. -
I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do thatTailgater said:Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.
The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.
A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.
After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.
-
Alabama proved in 2011 the regular season is meaningless ...dhdawg said:
I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do thatTailgater said:Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.
The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.
A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.
After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.
hth -
Meaningless for whom? You can't mean the student athletes and their fans who next year will be sitting home eagerly anticipating the 4-school play-off which will almost immediately become the Mother of meaninglessness, except for the 4 teams selected.dhdawg said:
I like to take 64 teams and make the regular session meaningless. I do thatTailgater said:Why stop at 8 or 16 teams for a football playoff? Per my count, there are now 35 bowl games inviting 70 schools to some fun and sun during the holiday season in late December - early November.
The 64 team NCAA basketball championship has to select a complimentary group of small unranked schools to be sacrificed as the lowest seeds in order to fill-in all their first round brackets, so the least football should do is a 32-team playoff and if the NCAA gets ready enough, they should just go ahead and schedule a 64-team event and call it Holiday Madness.
A six round 64-team could be easily morphed into a 70-team event by giving 6 conference champions a first round bye. The six round, 70-team football tournament could take only four weeks to crown a champion by doubling-up in the first two weeks with advancing teams playing two games the first week, two games the second week, a semifinal in the third week and the championship game in the fourth.
After a long regular season, college football teams will be able to handle two games a week with only three days of preparation. The student-study part of the college football experience might be totally screwed, but think of the TV money that could be made for all and the glory of having a true playoff.
-
a 64 team playoff means washington would've been a playoff team this year. Do u really want that?
-
Someone already thought of a 64-team playoff
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2013/12/college-football-playoff-bracket/
Looks like we'd bow out in the 2nd round, just like in March Madness
