this is another example

whatshouldicareabout said:

topdawgnc said:

So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

Win your division, win your conference ...

I, too, hate the NFL wildcards

are we talking NFL or college?

whatshouldicareabout said:

topdawgnc said:

are we talking NFL or college?

We are talking college, but if you hate non-division/non-conference champs winning the Natty, then do you hate it when Wildcard teams win the SB?

They're not exactly parallels, more just curiosity here.

Then keep it to college ... I'm sure there's a NFL bored for you to talk NFL if you'd like.

topdawgnc said:

dhdawg said:

topdawgnc said:

dhdawg said:

Travis Morris said:

8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

Pac-12 champ
B1G champ
SEC champ
Big-12 Champ
ACC champ
3 at large bids
seeding is based on BCS rankings

4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

Third Round ... Natty

Done. Done. Done.

not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference

Huh?

So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

Win your division, win your conference ...

Why do you hate the 2011 BCS national champions?

Your conference championship prerequisite sounds great, but it's never actually existed in cfb.

dnc said:

topdawgnc said:

dhdawg said:

topdawgnc said:

dhdawg said:

Travis Morris said:

8 teams is as high as it should ever go... maybe we get that in 2025 or whenever the new contract comes up.



BTW, Baylor is still going to score 40 points, don't you think?

Pac-12 champ
B1G champ
SEC champ
Big-12 Champ
ACC champ
3 at large bids
seeding is based on BCS rankings

4 Super Conferences - 8 Divisions

First round of playoffs is the division champs (8)

Second round of playoffs Conference Champs v. Conference Champs (4)

Third Round ... Natty

Done. Done. Done.

not a huge fan of the divisions. Sort of like the SEC when they had LSU and Alabama that year the two best teams were in the same division. Reward the conference champs and fill out the rest of the 8 with the best teams who didn't win their conference

Huh?

So like in the Alabama scenario a non-conference champion can win the natty?

I'm not a fan of a team who can't win their conference outright winning the natty.

If the two best teams are in the same division, THE best team will emerge from the conference.

Win your division, win your conference ...

Why do you hate the 2011 BCS national champions?

Your conference championship prerequisite sounds great, but it's never actually existed in cfb.

I hate, and do not recognize, the 2011 BCS Champions because it was fucking bullshit.

Alabama lost to LSU at home ... why should they get to play in the BCS National Championship?

I get its never existed before.

But here are some points:

The super conferences are coming. The B1G is moving everyone that direction.

Part of playoff push back is the travel length of schedule blah blah blah

With super conferences why not use those as the play off to get conference champions.

Just sayin.

BlowItUp said:

the fact that you don't recognize the 2011 BCS game speaks volumes.

Yes, Nick Saban loses sleep over it.