Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stats are for Losers

24

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Price

    Weird how both price and Browning exploded in their sophomore year to regress afterwards.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Crawfish said:

    You won't last long here if you talk about Jake Browning favorably. Hth

    Joined October of 2013 and survived many weekly sacrifices in the early days so go fuck yourself.

    I guess the thing we should all contemplate looking at these stats is this. Jake was efficient and did what he was asked to do. Sure he ran backwards at times and got sacked for 30 yard losses occasionally but he managed the game. That's what he was asked to do. Next year, we'll have more of a gunslinger. Gonna throw more pics, take more chances and make more mistakes. Salvon needs to stay healthy and productive or we are in real trouble next year because we would require the QB to carry the team. One who's not seen significant time in a long time.
    People give white QBs so much credit when they don’t do shit.

    Ready for Jake’s career? He was mediocre most of the time, good 10% of the time and had catastrophic failures constantly.

    In our last game he threw a red zone pick and fumbled on his own 25. And he’s a 4th year starter.

    He fucking sucks. Enough.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    2001400ex said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Price

    Weird how both price and Browning exploded in their sophomore year to regress afterwards.
    It’s not weird at all. Price never recovered from his knee injury and that completely neutralized one of his biggest weapons. Browning meanwhile benefitted from a fantastic OL and a loaded WR/TE corps, which both dropped off the following two seasons.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    Anyone that was really there Man for the Apple Cup knows that Jake did about as good as you could do in those conditions.

    That shit was nasty. Way nastier than the original 92 snow bowl, as that was a much drier snow.

    Some of you moss backs need to learn the difference.

    This Apple Cup first soaked you and then froze you out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited November 2018
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Crawfish said:

    You won't last long here if you talk about Jake Browning favorably. Hth

    Joined October of 2013 and survived many weekly sacrifices in the early days so go fuck yourself.

    I guess the thing we should all contemplate looking at these stats is this. Jake was efficient and did what he was asked to do. Sure he ran backwards at times and got sacked for 30 yard losses occasionally but he managed the game. That's what he was asked to do. Next year, we'll have more of a gunslinger. Gonna throw more pics, take more chances and make more mistakes. Salvon needs to stay healthy and productive or we are in real trouble next year because we would require the QB to carry the team. One who's not seen significant time in a long time.
    People give white QBs so much credit when they don’t do shit.

    Ready for Jake’s career? He was mediocre most of the time, good 10% of the time and had catastrophic failures constantly.

    In our last game he threw a red zone pick and fumbled on his own 25. And he’s a 4th year starter.

    He fucking sucks. Enough.
    Jake wins.

    That’s why he’s UW QB GOAT.

    He’ll finish with 40 wins and 4 straight bowl games.

    Time to face the truth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    sarktastic said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Crawfish said:

    You won't last long here if you talk about Jake Browning favorably. Hth

    Joined October of 2013 and survived many weekly sacrifices in the early days so go fuck yourself.

    I guess the thing we should all contemplate looking at these stats is this. Jake was efficient and did what he was asked to do. Sure he ran backwards at times and got sacked for 30 yard losses occasionally but he managed the game. That's what he was asked to do. Next year, we'll have more of a gunslinger. Gonna throw more pics, take more chances and make more mistakes. Salvon needs to stay healthy and productive or we are in real trouble next year because we would require the QB to carry the team. One who's not seen significant time in a long time.
    People give white QBs so much credit when they don’t do shit.

    Ready for Jake’s career? He was mediocre most of the time, good 10% of the time and had catastrophic failures constantly.

    In our last game he threw a red zone pick and fumbled on his own 25. And he’s a 4th year starter.

    He fucking sucks. Enough.
    Jake wins.

    That’s why he’s UW QB GOAT.

    He’ll finish with 40 wins and 4 straight bowl games.

    Time to face the truth.
    The team wins, typically despite browning. I assume you think the 1984 team was good because of hugh millen? That is your logic here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited November 2018
    not a single University of Washington Husky football team has won 40 games in any 4 year span.

    Ever.

    As in, Never.

    In about a month, Jake Browning will be the QB who achieved this, pouty face and all.

    Truth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter