Election Day Game Thread (Hondo and Bob's Thunder Dome)
The poles have the GOP barely retaining control of the Senate, like +1 to +4. I'll go high side on that and say the GOP picks up a couple seats and pushes their advantage to +4.
I was watching the news last night and some reporter was saying that in Arizona early voting had absolutely smashed the numbers of early voting in 2014 (last mid terms), and was approaching 2016 levels, which is unreal for a mid-term. Not sure what any of that means, but either way, it might be interesting. Might not.
Here's some girls to get your election day coverage started right!



Don't worry Hondo, I got some for you.


Comments
-
Hondo stands along side all the ugly and fat women complaining about sexual assault
-
Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back. -
FTFY2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means theyounger more liberal crowddead people voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back.
House will go to the Dems. Senate will stay GOP. Dems need to prop Justice Ginzberg up like Weekend at Bernies for another two years.
-
Hoping Dems take the House at least. Divided government is the best government.
-
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back. -
You don't know anything about her other than she has a D next to her name.UWerentThereMan said:
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back. -
What a dumbfuck2001400ex said:
You don't know anything about her other than she has a D next to her name.UWerentThereMan said:
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back.
-
You know nothing either.RaceBannon said:
What a dumbfuck2001400ex said:
You don't know anything about her other than she has a D next to her name.UWerentThereMan said:
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back. -
2001400ex said:
You don't know anything about her other than she has a D next to her name.UWerentThereMan said:
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back.
-
Sad thing is you beat off to that. Pretend it's a good hate fucking.pawz said:2001400ex said:
You don't know anything about her other than she has a D next to her name.UWerentThereMan said:
All that said, Nancy Pelosi sucks.2001400ex said:Free pub bitches.
That being said. A high voter turnout is generally better for Dems. That means the younger more liberal crowd voted. Many of these districts are small and will be decided by only a few votes.
Dems still don't win the house or Senate back.






