Noted racist speaks out against birth citizenship
Comments
-
Trump is playing the longer game. Attack the 14th by executive order to show it can be done, then claim a Democrat president will do the same thing with the 2nd amendment, and you've hurt every future Democrat running for office.HillsboroDuck said:
I think it complies with the 14th amendment fine, I agree it doesn't comply with precedent.2001400ex said:
Trump spreading lies and fear about immigrants is racist shit. The policy in and of itself doesn't comply with the 14th amendment and subsequent supreme count cases.HillsboroDuck said:
So you're saying this policy isn't racist?2001400ex said:
Harry Reid is a giant pussy and a politician. Who wavers in the wind wherever the money is.HillsboroDuck said:
If it's so stupid it should be really easy to answer.2001400ex said:
Ask me a question that isn't stupid.HillsboroDuck said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION @2001400exHillsboroDuck said:
So was Reid a racist from 93 until the AFL-CIO told him not to be a racist anymore, or did opposing birth citizenship become racist after 99?2001400ex said:Conservatives were for Obamacare before they were against Obamacare POTD.
BTW....noc about Harry Reid or what he said in 1993 or his reversal of opinion in 1999.
But you're a pussy, as always.
BTW I never called Trump a racist for his anchor baby policies. So I have zero idea why you are asking me that question.
My biggest issue with it is he wants to do it by executive order. The executive branch has gotten way too much power over the past few administrations. I'm not for accelerating that in any way shape or form. So I oppose this policy on procedural grounds. But I'd support it if it went through Congress.
It's the old accuse them of doing what you're doing thing, and Trump is an expert at it - and the Democrats are too distracted by Jacob Wohl to even see it coming. -
The best part. Conservatives have blamed Democrats for the nuclear option that allowed Kavanaugh to be confirmed with only 50 votes. Using that fucktarded logic, Conservatives would be to blame for overturning the 2nd amendment.dflea said:
Trump is playing the longer game. Attack the 14th by executive order to show it can be done, then claim a Democrat president will do the same thing with the 2nd amendment, and you've hurt every future Democrat running for office.HillsboroDuck said:
I think it complies with the 14th amendment fine, I agree it doesn't comply with precedent.2001400ex said:
Trump spreading lies and fear about immigrants is racist shit. The policy in and of itself doesn't comply with the 14th amendment and subsequent supreme count cases.HillsboroDuck said:
So you're saying this policy isn't racist?2001400ex said:
Harry Reid is a giant pussy and a politician. Who wavers in the wind wherever the money is.HillsboroDuck said:
If it's so stupid it should be really easy to answer.2001400ex said:
Ask me a question that isn't stupid.HillsboroDuck said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION @2001400exHillsboroDuck said:
So was Reid a racist from 93 until the AFL-CIO told him not to be a racist anymore, or did opposing birth citizenship become racist after 99?2001400ex said:Conservatives were for Obamacare before they were against Obamacare POTD.
BTW....noc about Harry Reid or what he said in 1993 or his reversal of opinion in 1999.
But you're a pussy, as always.
BTW I never called Trump a racist for his anchor baby policies. So I have zero idea why you are asking me that question.
My biggest issue with it is he wants to do it by executive order. The executive branch has gotten way too much power over the past few administrations. I'm not for accelerating that in any way shape or form. So I oppose this policy on procedural grounds. But I'd support it if it went through Congress.
It's the old accuse them of doing what you're doing thing, and Trump is an expert at it - and the Democrats are too distracted by Jacob Wohl to even see it coming.
(Which everyone with a brain knows 2A can't be overturned without 2/3 votes from the states) -
Contemporary writings by the supporters of the amendment make it clear that it was for freed slaves. The language is archaic but it only applies to those subject to the jurisdiction of the USA not illegal aliens
The Supreme Court has not ruled on whether it does apply to illegals and baby tourists or not. This is the first step on that road and also once again gets the democrats in favor of something that does not have widespread support. The Reid video shows how far the democrats have moved
@dflea is not wrong. This is a mid term political ploy
That dumb shit Trump sure gets lucky at times -
Yes the Original intent was for slaves because at that time, America basically had open borders. Since things have changed, there have been supreme Court decisions that have interpreted the language for other scenarios.RaceBannon said:Contemporary writings by the supporters of the amendment make it clear that it was for freed slaves. The language is archaic but it only applies to those subject to the jurisdiction of the USA not illegal aliens
The Supreme Court has not ruled on whether it does apply to illegals and baby tourists or not. This is the first step on that road and also once again gets the democrats in favor of something that does not have widespread support. The Reid video shows how far the democrats have moved
@dflea is not wrong. This is a mid term political ploy
That dumb shit Trump sure gets lucky at times
So Reid speaks for Democrats but heritage foundation doesn't speak for conservatives? El oh El.
That being said, yes there are a lot of dumbfucks who buy into the Trump immigration nonsense. -
List one2001400ex said:
Yes the Original intent was for slaves because at that time, America basically had open borders. Since things have changed, there have been supreme Court decisions that have interpreted the language for other scenarios.RaceBannon said:Contemporary writings by the supporters of the amendment make it clear that it was for freed slaves. The language is archaic but it only applies to those subject to the jurisdiction of the USA not illegal aliens
The Supreme Court has not ruled on whether it does apply to illegals and baby tourists or not. This is the first step on that road and also once again gets the democrats in favor of something that does not have widespread support. The Reid video shows how far the democrats have moved
@dflea is not wrong. This is a mid term political ploy
That dumb shit Trump sure gets lucky at times
So Reid speaks for Democrats but heritage foundation doesn't speak for conservatives? El oh El.
That being said, yes there are a lot of dumbfucks who buy into the Trump immigration nonsense.
Reid was only the majority leader of the Senate you fucking moron
By Trump immigration nonsense do you mean Clinton, Reid, Obama, and the democrats immigration nonsense?
Its the same position -
2001400ex said:
Trump spreading lies and fear about immigrants is racist shit. The policy in and of itself doesn't comply with the 14th amendment and subsequent supreme count cases.HillsboroDuck said:
So you're saying this policy isn't racist?2001400ex said:
Harry Reid is a giant pussy and a politician. Who wavers in the wind wherever the money is.HillsboroDuck said:
If it's so stupid it should be really easy to answer.2001400ex said:
Ask me a question that isn't stupid.HillsboroDuck said:
ANSWER THE QUESTION @2001400exHillsboroDuck said:
So was Reid a racist from 93 until the AFL-CIO told him not to be a racist anymore, or did opposing birth citizenship become racist after 99?2001400ex said:Conservatives were for Obamacare before they were against Obamacare POTD.
BTW....noc about Harry Reid or what he said in 1993 or his reversal of opinion in 1999.
But you're a pussy, as always.
BTW I never called Trump a racist for his anchor baby policies. So I have zero idea why you are asking me that question.
Hondo before the got his talking points.
Hondo after he got his talking points:
That being said. There is not clear precedent on two illegal immigrant parents having a baby on US soil. The precedent was Chinese parents here legally. So this will have to go to the supreme Court and most legal experts think it won't pass the supreme Court. Some think it will. Either way that is years down the road.
-
The intent of the 14th Amendment did not make citizens of offspring of alien parents born on American soil, but rather the Supreme Court’s malfeasance did so. And the Supreme Court’s methodical malfeasance can be demonstrated, and the decision reversed, without requiring any amendment.
By threatening an EO, Trump prompted the legislative branch, through Lindsey Graham to introduce legislation ending the absurd policy of birthright citizenship. This is the correct path to take.
-
Bill Clinton got elected because everyone likes bill Clinton i
-
Agreed; that's how you got here.Sledog said:Can't have people coming to our nation just to drop babies.
-
If Graham actually introduces such legislation, and Trump actually holds off on the EO, I'll side with this.Dude61 said:The intent of the 14th Amendment did not make citizens of offspring of alien parents born on American soil, but rather the Supreme Court’s malfeasance did so. And the Supreme Court’s methodical malfeasance can be demonstrated, and the decision reversed, without requiring any amendment.
By threatening an EO, Trump prompted the legislative branch, through Lindsey Graham to introduce legislation ending the absurd policy of birthright citizenship. This is the correct path to take.
Big ifs though. -
No Mr. College así es como te escabulliste.creepycoug said:
Agreed; that's how you got here.Sledog said:Can't have people coming to our nation just to drop babies.
-
Try again.Sledog said:
No Mr. College así es como te escabulliste.creepycoug said:
Agreed; that's how you got here.Sledog said:Can't have people coming to our nation just to drop babies.
