Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon @ WSU game thread

24

Comments

  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
    Doesn't like to make excuses though
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
    Doesn't like to make excuses though
    It's fucking interesting! That's all I'm saying.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    There's coog win streak to snap and a lot to play for including a PAC 12 championship and potential playoff spot. Motivation won't be an issue.

    Coog off a bye week, oregon off an emotional high and a physical game. They spent two weeks going all in to beat a banged up UW team. Cougs are going to disembowel them and roll around in their colons
    You're sounding more and more like a coog every day.
    Don’t confuse wanting every oregon player to have a career ending injury and every duck fan to die in a firey car cash as being a coog. HTH
    Replace Oregon with UW and that sentence oozes the cougery from all orifices.
    Fuck off. Idiot.
    Make me, coog stooge.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    There's coog win streak to snap and a lot to play for including a PAC 12 championship and potential playoff spot. Motivation won't be an issue.

    Coog off a bye week, oregon off an emotional high and a physical game. They spent two weeks going all in to beat a banged up UW team. Cougs are going to disembowel them and roll around in their colons
    You're sounding more and more like a coog every day.
    Don’t confuse wanting every oregon player to have a career ending injury and every duck fan to die in a firey car cash as being a coog. HTH
    No, that's pretty coog-like.

    I should know.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,016

    Depending on the coogs to win a game that most everyone thinks they are going to win is s dicey proposition

    All the hot takes are true, bye week etc. but the ducks are all business and Leavitt is kicking ass to keep them focused and Lombardi Award Coach of the Year Marconi Cristobal just doesn't lose to WSU

    He just doesn't

    This sounded sarcastic.

    You are right about one thing: depending on Coug! to do anything other than get really drunk is a shaky place to be.

    Whatever.



    Your Marconi radar is nearly as developed as hondo's need to defend Hillary to the death at even a hint of an insult or discouraging word

    RRRRAYSISS!!!!!!
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Life ending injury > career ending injury

    #HilinskisHope
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    GTFO

    Eastern is ranked 8th
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    There's a new B1G network show out on Nebraska 1997 winning the national championship.

    Prominent was their big win over second ranked Washington

    Huh?

    Also Winstrom said hdgaf that Brock.thinks he's dirty
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,330

    There's coog win streak to snap and a lot to play for including a PAC 12 championship and potential playoff spot. Motivation won't be an issue.

    Coog off a bye week, oregon off an emotional high and a physical game. They spent two weeks going all in to beat a banged up UW team. Cougs are going to disembowel them and roll around in their colons
    You're sounding more and more like obk every day.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    link?

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    link?

    Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free HillsboroQuook, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Mosster47 said:

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
    Prukop was your opening day starter, him being the "backup" was only a function of when that game was on the schedule.

    I do appreciate the excuses though.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club

    Mosster47 said:

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
    Prukop was your opening day starter, him being the "backup" was only a function of when that game was on the schedule.

    I do appreciate the excuses though.
    Mosster and OBK don't make excuses
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    I like my @LeachNeedsMoreTim in this one.

    Cuogs got all the intangibles in this one, similar to how Oregon had them last week. However, I just know the one time we need to rely on the Cuogs to help us out they're gonna Cuog it. I'm taking the Quacks in this one and will hope for the Utes to take them down next month.
    I've picked Oregon to beat WSU each of the last three years, so Oregon is pretty much guaranteed to win this one now.
    Oregon was playing a backup QB in all three of those.
    Prukop was your opening day starter, him being the "backup" was only a function of when that game was on the schedule.

    I do appreciate the excuses though.
    Someone besides Darnold was USC's starter at first in 2016. Someone besides Hogan was Stanford's starter in 2012.

    Just because a coach is FS that doesn't change the reality.
  • LesGrossman
    LesGrossman Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,500 Founders Club
    Listen, guys. If we’re goimg to start bashing going on 5 day benders, I’m fucking out of here
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    edited October 2018

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    Yeah...that’s a fucking lie

    If that were true, you wouldn’t see analysis saying “that Washington loss to auburn is looking worse each week”
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    Yeah...that’s a fucking lie

    If that were true, you wouldn’t see analysis saying “that Washington loss to auburn is looking worse each week”
    Correct. If Auburn was unbeaten and sitting at #3 right now then UW would still have a small shot of making the playoffs if they won out. They have zero shot now because Auburn is going .500.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    Yeah...that’s a fucking lie

    If that were true, you wouldn’t see analysis saying “that Washington loss to auburn is looking worse each week”
    Shut up.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    edited October 2018

    Coogers haven't played a ranked team yet. Oregon just played 3 and beat 2, including beating the tar out of the Card for most of the game, a game that should have been won except for the atrocious fluke plays and mistakes. I like our chances.

    Cal isn't a ranked team. Nobody cares what somebody was ranked when you played them if they demonstrate they are shit after that, unless you still want to count Auburn as a loss to a top 10 team or UW. Which would be FS.
    The playoff committee takes where teams where ranked when you played them into consideration.
    Yeah...that’s a fucking lie

    If that were true, you wouldn’t see analysis saying “that Washington loss to auburn is looking worse each week”
    Shut up.


    Fixed
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    There's coog win streak to snap and a lot to play for including a PAC 12 championship and potential playoff spot. Motivation won't be an issue.

    Coog off a bye week, oregon off an emotional high and a physical game. They spent two weeks going all in to beat a banged up UW team. Cougs are going to disembowel them and roll around in their colons
    i laffed, for realz
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Listen, guys. If we’re goimg to start bashing going on 5 day benders, I’m fucking out of here

    Agreed. 5 day bender babies parents read this board. Let’s clean it up a bit.
  • Baphomet
    Baphomet Member Posts: 1,511
    I think Leach + a bye can take Oregon.

    Oregon needed a bye + a missed FG to beat us in their house.

    They lose in the Palouse.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,010
    MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW MINSHEW
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,720 Founders Club
    Man Leach showing Bush and Pete how bad Oregon D is