Washington is FUCKED against Oregon this year
Comments
-
Cringe
-
I'm just waiting for her to drop a statement about UO building an SEC team by accident. Unmistakable proff that OBK=UOfuckgirl will come sooner than later.
-
When did our? watch begin?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
-
Why is the King in the North and the Targaryen Dragon’s attacking the Night’s Watch? And why is The Wall working against the Night’s Watch?
-
I was a tad bit worried about the game until I saw this tweet. Now I know we will blow them out. You can't go around tweeting crap like this and expect anything other than a blowout loss.
-
This is going to be a fun week. Most Oregon fans cant even see how much Cal was in control of their game. Take away the miscues that led to turnovers and Cal wins this one Rather easily.
-
2 year streak and Washington is living rent free in the state of Oregon.
-
The fact that Oregon fans are so concentrated on starting a new streak speaks volumes. #sizzle
-
I am speaking up for us nerds ( @ThomasFremont @Gladstone ) but none of that makes any fucking sense from a GoT perspective and it infuriates me.
-
say, 34-17?Bread said:This is going to be a fun week. Most Oregon fans cant even see how much Cal was in control of their game. Take away the miscues that led to turnovers and Cal wins this one Rather easily.
-
I am terrified of dragons that can #fillthesleeves
-
Scissor with @Khaleesi or GTFO
-
On this, the 10 year anniversary of Five Reasons, the only way to ensure that we have permanently switched places is for some quook to post five reasons why Oregon wins this game. Perhaps someone would like to axe UODuck girl for 5 reasons she is so confident?
-
The amount of hate surprises me. I figured you losers would have loved her Game of Throne references.
-
AIDSgreenblood said:The amount of hate surprises me. I figured you losers would have loved her Game of Throne references.
-
The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
-
Nope. We're going to shit down your throat.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
-
Quooks getting nervous...
-
UW's receivers as a unit have looked amazing. Inferior quarterback but far superior runningbacks. Far superior defense, tight ends as well.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
Playing a shit team on the road won't mean anything unless the offensive line loses some bodies in the process.
Home advantage meant a lot *last year*. We'll see if it means anything this year. It didn't in 2016 for both you, the cougs, and us (playing SC). -
Firing up the Troopers.
-
I will admit I missed the 1st half...but that's not what I saw.Bread said:This is going to be a fun week. Most Oregon fans cant even see how much Cal was in control of their game. Take away the miscues that led to turnovers and Cal wins this one Rather easily.
HUGE running lanes for Laird though. -
Amazing is a bit of a stretch for the receivers IMO, but they've been at least a B+ which is far better than some feared coming into the season.haie said:
UW's receivers as a unit have looked amazing. Inferior quarterback but far superior runningbacks. Far superior defense, tight ends as well.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
Playing a shit team on the road won't mean anything unless the offensive line loses some bodies in the process.
Home advantage meant a lot *last year*. We'll see if it means anything this year. It didn't in 2016 for both you, the cougs, and us (playing SC). -
Bailing out your quarterback with acrobatic catches for TD's or 3dDC's == amazing imoHillsboroDuck said:
Amazing is a bit of a stretch for the receivers IMO, but they've been at least a B+ which is far better than some feared coming into the season.haie said:
UW's receivers as a unit have looked amazing. Inferior quarterback but far superior runningbacks. Far superior defense, tight ends as well.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
Playing a shit team on the road won't mean anything unless the offensive line loses some bodies in the process.
Home advantage meant a lot *last year*. We'll see if it means anything this year. It didn't in 2016 for both you, the cougs, and us (playing SC). -
They've dropped a couple TD's as well, not to mention a stupid OPI.haie said:
Bailing out your quarterback with acrobatic catches for TD's or 3dDC's == amazing imoHillsboroDuck said:
Amazing is a bit of a stretch for the receivers IMO, but they've been at least a B+ which is far better than some feared coming into the season.haie said:
UW's receivers as a unit have looked amazing. Inferior quarterback but far superior runningbacks. Far superior defense, tight ends as well.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
Playing a shit team on the road won't mean anything unless the offensive line loses some bodies in the process.
Home advantage meant a lot *last year*. We'll see if it means anything this year. It didn't in 2016 for both you, the cougs, and us (playing SC).
Again, they've been good. An amazing WR unit is one that in the discussion for best in the nation IMO and they ain't that. -
Fine. Very, very good. Can't think of a Pac 12 team with better, only a few individual receivers (Whiteside, Harry, Vaughns).HillsboroDuck said:
They've dropped a couple TD's as well, not to mention a stupid OPI.haie said:
Bailing out your quarterback with acrobatic catches for TD's or 3dDC's == amazing imoHillsboroDuck said:
Amazing is a bit of a stretch for the receivers IMO, but they've been at least a B+ which is far better than some feared coming into the season.haie said:
UW's receivers as a unit have looked amazing. Inferior quarterback but far superior runningbacks. Far superior defense, tight ends as well.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
Playing a shit team on the road won't mean anything unless the offensive line loses some bodies in the process.
Home advantage meant a lot *last year*. We'll see if it means anything this year. It didn't in 2016 for both you, the cougs, and us (playing SC).
Again, they've been good. An amazing WR unit is one that in the discussion for best in the nation IMO and they ain't that. -
The sum of the parts in the receiving corps is better than 2017. Fuller is pretty damn good and Ty Jones will be All Pac 1st or 2nd team before he leave UW barring injury. Watching number 88 and 87 line up on most of our plays gives me BRB, YO thoughts.
-
Jake's stat line matched his performance as closely as it has in a couple of seasons. Sure some balls were a tad late and BYU didn't really pressure him but that was the Jake we signed up for. At least he is back to doing well against bad teams. Bodes well for us against Oregon
If Levitt PUNCHES up against the run with 8 or 9 UW goes over the top. If Leavitt CHOKES and plays back then UW runs them over. -
I wish all of you would stop being so flippant about this game...THE FATE OF AVATARS ARE AT STAKE!
-
average receivers? The receivers have been great. Jake Browning isn't as good as herbert but washington is superior to oregon at every other position group.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
-
Herbert has not beaten a single good team in his career. Wait a minute....neither has Browning.LuxrayBeats said:
average receivers? The receivers have been great. Jake Browning isn't as good as herbert but washington is superior to oregon at every other position group.greenblood said:The fact that Oregon is coming off a bye, UW playing consecutive road games with an inferior quarterback and average receivers, and UW having to scheme for a different Oregon offense makes me think this game will at least be competitive.
At least Browning can beat Furd at home
