Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is the greatest Stanford team of Mosster's life

2

Comments

  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    It absolutely is, which isn't saying much. You guys act like Stanford is a super power.

    They've beaten Oregon a couple times and Iowa once.

    So you didn't see the plungering Stanford took tonight?
    Are we saying this Notre Dame squad wouldn't run a train on the Pac-12? Is that what we are saying?

    Stanford loses all the time. You act like them losing to a legit Top 10 on the road the week after they won a Top 25 miracle game is something crazy.
    Stanford has a number of teams in the past decade that wouldn't get plungered by this ND team.

    Even you know that's true.
    I don't know that. What year has Stanford not been plungered by someone?

    They always find a way.
    2015 and 2012 are the obvious ones but there are others.

    I'm sure this is the greatest ND team of your life also.
    Really don’t understand the giddy doogs after you lost to a VERY GOOD Auburn team.

    You pretty much lost the exact same game. Except then Auburn lost.
    Huh?
    It's really simple. Mike and I told you that Auburn is an 8-4 team, which they are, and you lost to them.

    Now you're super excited because Stanford lost to a 11-1 ND team to make yourself feel better.
    YOU DON'T GET THE THREAD
    Go ahead and bump this when Stanford beats CU in Santa Clara.
    If Stanford wins the Pac, I'll have to consider whether this was the worst Pac of all time.

    1999 is the gold standard though.
    Why do you hate 1-8 in bowl games last year, two 1st round QB's leaving, the hiring of Herm Edwards and Kevin Sumlin, and a projected starting QB committing suicide?

    I can think of no time when the conference was worse. The one decent OOC win will be ASU against a mediocre Sparty team in triple digit heat.

    UCLA is going Owen. The Beavs are going 1-1-11. UA is finishing with 2 or 3 wins. Colorado is the favorite to win the south. etc. Utah is going to struggle to win 6 games. USC is going to win the south with a 14 year old QB.

    It appeared 2016 would be the bottom of the barrel but it just keeps getting worse.
    Stanford lost to San Jose State and to Texas by 69-17 in 1999.

    The conference is really bad now, but 1999 was a magical season.
    ASU lost to SDSU and USC got embarrassed by Texas. Arizona lost to the Mormos.

    Given the conference took on additional dreck in 2011 thus making the conference even worse I still give the nod to present times.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    SarkFanSixtyNine said:

    how can a p5 conference be this bad

    1 SEC-WEST (A) = 82.61 82.43 ( 1) 7 82.45 ( 1)
    2 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 81.10 80.12 ( 2) 7 81.15 ( 2)
    3 BIG 12 (A) = 78.73 78.36 ( 3) 10 78.49 ( 3)
    4 SEC-EAST (A) = 78.29 78.32 ( 4) 7 78.32 ( 4)
    5 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 77.87 77.22 ( 5) 6 77.68 ( 5)
    6 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.49 77.20 ( 6) 7 76.88 ( 6)
    7 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 75.25 74.46 ( 7) 6 74.63 ( 7)
    8 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 74.44 74.36 ( 8) 7 74.42 ( 8)
    9 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 73.58 73.95 ( 9) 7 73.73 ( 9)
    10 AAC EAST (A) = 68.47 67.20 ( 10) 6 68.04 ( 10)
    11 AAC WEST (A) = 66.62 66.89 ( 11) 6 66.81 ( 11)
    12 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 65.37 66.26 ( 12) 6 65.78 ( 12)
    13 SUN BELT-EAST (A) = 63.75 64.61 ( 13) 5 64.19 ( 13)
    14 MAC-WEST (A) = 63.61 63.50 ( 16) 6 63.52 ( 14)
    15 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 63.28 63.89 ( 14) 6 63.44 ( 15)
    16 MWC-WEST (A) = 62.76 63.55 ( 15) 6 63.16 ( 16)
    17 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 59.18 59.73 ( 17) 10 59.50 ( 17)
    18 CONFERENCE USA-EAST (A) = 58.15 57.36 ( 18) 7 57.66 ( 18)
    19 MAC-EAST (A) = 58.00 57.28 ( 19) 6 57.44 ( 19)
    20 CONFERENCE USA-WEST (A) = 56.92 56.74 ( 20) 7 56.81 ( 20)
    21 SUN BELT-WEST (A) = 52.68 52.82 ( 21) 5 52.80 ( 21)
    22 COLONIAL (AA)= 50.91 51.38 ( 22) 12 50.97 ( 22)
    23 BIG SKY (AA)= 50.10 50.00 ( 23) 14 50.03 ( 23)
    24 SOUTHERN (AA)= 45.14 44.78 ( 24) 9 45.05 ( 24)
    25 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 44.52 44.75 ( 25) 8 44.63 ( 25)
    26 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 43.11 43.06 ( 26) 9 43.13 ( 26)
    27 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 41.95 41.34 ( 27) 11 41.72 ( 27)
    28 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 36.61 37.35 ( 28) 6 36.69 ( 28)
    29 NORTHEAST (AA)= 32.29 31.99 ( 30) 7 32.08 ( 29)
    30 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 31.69 31.48 ( 31) 10 31.55 ( 31)
    31 PATRIOT (AA)= 31.53 32.92 ( 29) 7 31.98 ( 30)
    32 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 31.38 31.38 ( 32) 2 31.38 ( 32)
    33 SWAC-WEST (AA)= 30.95 29.49 ( 33) 5 30.58 ( 33)
    34 SWAC-EAST (AA)= 23.57 23.67 ( 34) 5 23.59 ( 34)
    35 PIONEER (AA)= 20.12 20.79 ( 35) 10 20.46 ( 35)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Mad_Son said:

    SarkFanSixtyNine said:

    how can a p5 conference be this bad

    1 SEC-WEST (A) = 82.61 82.43 ( 1) 7 82.45 ( 1)
    2 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 81.10 80.12 ( 2) 7 81.15 ( 2)
    3 BIG 12 (A) = 78.73 78.36 ( 3) 10 78.49 ( 3)
    4 SEC-EAST (A) = 78.29 78.32 ( 4) 7 78.32 ( 4)
    5 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 77.87 77.22 ( 5) 6 77.68 ( 5)
    6 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.49 77.20 ( 6) 7 76.88 ( 6)
    7 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 75.25 74.46 ( 7) 6 74.63 ( 7)
    8 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 74.44 74.36 ( 8) 7 74.42 ( 8)
    9 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 73.58 73.95 ( 9) 7 73.73 ( 9)
    10 AAC EAST (A) = 68.47 67.20 ( 10) 6 68.04 ( 10)
    11 AAC WEST (A) = 66.62 66.89 ( 11) 6 66.81 ( 11)
    12 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 65.37 66.26 ( 12) 6 65.78 ( 12)
    13 SUN BELT-EAST (A) = 63.75 64.61 ( 13) 5 64.19 ( 13)
    14 MAC-WEST (A) = 63.61 63.50 ( 16) 6 63.52 ( 14)
    15 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 63.28 63.89 ( 14) 6 63.44 ( 15)
    16 MWC-WEST (A) = 62.76 63.55 ( 15) 6 63.16 ( 16)
    17 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 59.18 59.73 ( 17) 10 59.50 ( 17)
    18 CONFERENCE USA-EAST (A) = 58.15 57.36 ( 18) 7 57.66 ( 18)
    19 MAC-EAST (A) = 58.00 57.28 ( 19) 6 57.44 ( 19)
    20 CONFERENCE USA-WEST (A) = 56.92 56.74 ( 20) 7 56.81 ( 20)
    21 SUN BELT-WEST (A) = 52.68 52.82 ( 21) 5 52.80 ( 21)
    22 COLONIAL (AA)= 50.91 51.38 ( 22) 12 50.97 ( 22)
    23 BIG SKY (AA)= 50.10 50.00 ( 23) 14 50.03 ( 23)
    24 SOUTHERN (AA)= 45.14 44.78 ( 24) 9 45.05 ( 24)
    25 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 44.52 44.75 ( 25) 8 44.63 ( 25)
    26 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 43.11 43.06 ( 26) 9 43.13 ( 26)
    27 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 41.95 41.34 ( 27) 11 41.72 ( 27)
    28 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 36.61 37.35 ( 28) 6 36.69 ( 28)
    29 NORTHEAST (AA)= 32.29 31.99 ( 30) 7 32.08 ( 29)
    30 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 31.69 31.48 ( 31) 10 31.55 ( 31)
    31 PATRIOT (AA)= 31.53 32.92 ( 29) 7 31.98 ( 30)
    32 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 31.38 31.38 ( 32) 2 31.38 ( 32)
    33 SWAC-WEST (AA)= 30.95 29.49 ( 33) 5 30.58 ( 33)
    34 SWAC-EAST (AA)= 23.57 23.67 ( 34) 5 23.59 ( 34)
    35 PIONEER (AA)= 20.12 20.79 ( 35) 10 20.46 ( 35)
    That is to say, the P5 is clearly above non-P5 although the gap between SEC West and B1G East is about the same as the rest of the P5 and the best non-P5
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    SarkFanSixtyNine said:

    how can a p5 conference be this bad

    1 SEC-WEST (A) = 82.61 82.43 ( 1) 7 82.45 ( 1)
    2 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 81.10 80.12 ( 2) 7 81.15 ( 2)
    3 BIG 12 (A) = 78.73 78.36 ( 3) 10 78.49 ( 3)
    4 SEC-EAST (A) = 78.29 78.32 ( 4) 7 78.32 ( 4)
    5 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 77.87 77.22 ( 5) 6 77.68 ( 5)
    6 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.49 77.20 ( 6) 7 76.88 ( 6)
    7 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 75.25 74.46 ( 7) 6 74.63 ( 7)
    8 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 74.44 74.36 ( 8) 7 74.42 ( 8)
    9 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 73.58 73.95 ( 9) 7 73.73 ( 9)
    10 AAC EAST (A) = 68.47 67.20 ( 10) 6 68.04 ( 10)
    11 AAC WEST (A) = 66.62 66.89 ( 11) 6 66.81 ( 11)
    12 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 65.37 66.26 ( 12) 6 65.78 ( 12)
    13 SUN BELT-EAST (A) = 63.75 64.61 ( 13) 5 64.19 ( 13)
    14 MAC-WEST (A) = 63.61 63.50 ( 16) 6 63.52 ( 14)
    15 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 63.28 63.89 ( 14) 6 63.44 ( 15)
    16 MWC-WEST (A) = 62.76 63.55 ( 15) 6 63.16 ( 16)
    17 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 59.18 59.73 ( 17) 10 59.50 ( 17)
    18 CONFERENCE USA-EAST (A) = 58.15 57.36 ( 18) 7 57.66 ( 18)
    19 MAC-EAST (A) = 58.00 57.28 ( 19) 6 57.44 ( 19)
    20 CONFERENCE USA-WEST (A) = 56.92 56.74 ( 20) 7 56.81 ( 20)
    21 SUN BELT-WEST (A) = 52.68 52.82 ( 21) 5 52.80 ( 21)
    22 COLONIAL (AA)= 50.91 51.38 ( 22) 12 50.97 ( 22)
    23 BIG SKY (AA)= 50.10 50.00 ( 23) 14 50.03 ( 23)
    24 SOUTHERN (AA)= 45.14 44.78 ( 24) 9 45.05 ( 24)
    25 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 44.52 44.75 ( 25) 8 44.63 ( 25)
    26 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 43.11 43.06 ( 26) 9 43.13 ( 26)
    27 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 41.95 41.34 ( 27) 11 41.72 ( 27)
    28 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 36.61 37.35 ( 28) 6 36.69 ( 28)
    29 NORTHEAST (AA)= 32.29 31.99 ( 30) 7 32.08 ( 29)
    30 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 31.69 31.48 ( 31) 10 31.55 ( 31)
    31 PATRIOT (AA)= 31.53 32.92 ( 29) 7 31.98 ( 30)
    32 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 31.38 31.38 ( 32) 2 31.38 ( 32)
    33 SWAC-WEST (AA)= 30.95 29.49 ( 33) 5 30.58 ( 33)
    34 SWAC-EAST (AA)= 23.57 23.67 ( 34) 5 23.59 ( 34)
    35 PIONEER (AA)= 20.12 20.79 ( 35) 10 20.46 ( 35)
    That is to say, the P5 is clearly above non-P5 although the gap between SEC West and B1G East is about the same as the rest of the P5 and the best non-P5
    The MWC would compete very well against the Pac-12, 2015-present.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Mad_Son said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    SarkFanSixtyNine said:

    how can a p5 conference be this bad

    1 SEC-WEST (A) = 82.61 82.43 ( 1) 7 82.45 ( 1)
    2 BIG TEN-EAST (A) = 81.10 80.12 ( 2) 7 81.15 ( 2)
    3 BIG 12 (A) = 78.73 78.36 ( 3) 10 78.49 ( 3)
    4 SEC-EAST (A) = 78.29 78.32 ( 4) 7 78.32 ( 4)
    5 PAC-12(NORTH) (A) = 77.87 77.22 ( 5) 6 77.68 ( 5)
    6 ACC-ATLANTIC (A) = 76.49 77.20 ( 6) 7 76.88 ( 6)
    7 PAC-12(SOUTH) (A) = 75.25 74.46 ( 7) 6 74.63 ( 7)
    8 ACC-COASTAL (A) = 74.44 74.36 ( 8) 7 74.42 ( 8)
    9 BIG TEN-WEST (A) = 73.58 73.95 ( 9) 7 73.73 ( 9)
    10 AAC EAST (A) = 68.47 67.20 ( 10) 6 68.04 ( 10)
    11 AAC WEST (A) = 66.62 66.89 ( 11) 6 66.81 ( 11)
    12 MWC-MOUNTAIN (A) = 65.37 66.26 ( 12) 6 65.78 ( 12)
    13 SUN BELT-EAST (A) = 63.75 64.61 ( 13) 5 64.19 ( 13)
    14 MAC-WEST (A) = 63.61 63.50 ( 16) 6 63.52 ( 14)
    15 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 63.28 63.89 ( 14) 6 63.44 ( 15)
    16 MWC-WEST (A) = 62.76 63.55 ( 15) 6 63.16 ( 16)
    17 MISSOURI VALLEY (AA)= 59.18 59.73 ( 17) 10 59.50 ( 17)
    18 CONFERENCE USA-EAST (A) = 58.15 57.36 ( 18) 7 57.66 ( 18)
    19 MAC-EAST (A) = 58.00 57.28 ( 19) 6 57.44 ( 19)
    20 CONFERENCE USA-WEST (A) = 56.92 56.74 ( 20) 7 56.81 ( 20)
    21 SUN BELT-WEST (A) = 52.68 52.82 ( 21) 5 52.80 ( 21)
    22 COLONIAL (AA)= 50.91 51.38 ( 22) 12 50.97 ( 22)
    23 BIG SKY (AA)= 50.10 50.00 ( 23) 14 50.03 ( 23)
    24 SOUTHERN (AA)= 45.14 44.78 ( 24) 9 45.05 ( 24)
    25 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 44.52 44.75 ( 25) 8 44.63 ( 25)
    26 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 43.11 43.06 ( 26) 9 43.13 ( 26)
    27 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 41.95 41.34 ( 27) 11 41.72 ( 27)
    28 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 36.61 37.35 ( 28) 6 36.69 ( 28)
    29 NORTHEAST (AA)= 32.29 31.99 ( 30) 7 32.08 ( 29)
    30 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 31.69 31.48 ( 31) 10 31.55 ( 31)
    31 PATRIOT (AA)= 31.53 32.92 ( 29) 7 31.98 ( 30)
    32 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 31.38 31.38 ( 32) 2 31.38 ( 32)
    33 SWAC-WEST (AA)= 30.95 29.49 ( 33) 5 30.58 ( 33)
    34 SWAC-EAST (AA)= 23.57 23.67 ( 34) 5 23.59 ( 34)
    35 PIONEER (AA)= 20.12 20.79 ( 35) 10 20.46 ( 35)
    That is to say, the P5 is clearly above non-P5 although the gap between SEC West and B1G East is about the same as the rest of the P5 and the best non-P5
    The MWC would compete very well against the Pac-12, 2015-present.
    In 2015 the Pac-12 went 12-2 against the MWC...
    The Pac-12 should be undefeated against the MWC every year. There is zero fucking talent out west besides a couple metro areas.

    The talent gap between those programs should be ridiculous and they're not.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Stanford is now 7-3 against Notre Dame the last 10
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ToiletBowl1983
    ToiletBowl1983 Member Posts: 82
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    It absolutely is, which isn't saying much. You guys act like Stanford is a super power.

    They've beaten Oregon a couple times and Iowa once.

    So you didn't see the plungering Stanford took tonight?
    Are we saying this Notre Dame squad wouldn't run a train on the Pac-12? Is that what we are saying?

    Stanford loses all the time. You act like them losing to a legit Top 10 on the road the week after they won a Top 25 miracle game is something crazy.
    Stanford has a number of teams in the past decade that wouldn't get plungered by this ND team.

    Even you know that's true.
    I don't know that. What year has Stanford not been plungered by someone?

    They always find a way.
    2015 and 2012 are the obvious ones but there are others.

    I'm sure this is the greatest ND team of your life also.
    Really don’t understand the giddy doogs after you lost to a VERY GOOD Auburn team.

    You pretty much lost the exact same game. Except then Auburn lost.
    Huh?
    It's really simple. Mike and I told you that Auburn is an 8-4 team, which they are, and you lost to them.

    Now you're super excited because Stanford lost to a 11-1 ND team to make yourself feel better.
    YOU DON'T GET THE THREAD
    Go ahead and bump this when Stanford beats CU in Santa Clara.
    If Stanford wins the Pac, I'll have to consider whether this was the worst Pac of all time.

    1999 is the gold standard though.
    Why do you hate 1-8 in bowl games last year, two 1st round QB's leaving, the hiring of Herm Edwards and Kevin Sumlin, and a projected starting QB committing suicide?

    I can think of no time when the conference was worse. The one decent OOC win will be ASU against a mediocre Sparty team in triple digit heat.

    UCLA is going Owen. The Beavs are going 1-1-11. UA is finishing with 2 or 3 wins. Colorado is the favorite to win the south. etc. Utah is going to struggle to win 6 games. USC is going to win the south with a 14 year old QB.

    It appeared 2016 would be the bottom of the barrel but it just keeps getting worse.
    Stanford lost to San Jose State and to Texas by 69-17 in 1999.

    The conference is really bad now, but 1999 was a magical season.
    Agreed. The final AP poll had only 1 Pac 10 team ranked (Oregon #19)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    HillsboroDuck said:

    ToiletBowl1983 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    It absolutely is, which isn't saying much. You guys act like Stanford is a super power.

    They've beaten Oregon a couple times and Iowa once.

    So you didn't see the plungering Stanford took tonight?
    Are we saying this Notre Dame squad wouldn't run a train on the Pac-12? Is that what we are saying?

    Stanford loses all the time. You act like them losing to a legit Top 10 on the road the week after they won a Top 25 miracle game is something crazy.
    Stanford has a number of teams in the past decade that wouldn't get plungered by this ND team.

    Even you know that's true.
    I don't know that. What year has Stanford not been plungered by someone?

    They always find a way.
    2015 and 2012 are the obvious ones but there are others.

    I'm sure this is the greatest ND team of your life also.
    Really don’t understand the giddy doogs after you lost to a VERY GOOD Auburn team.

    You pretty much lost the exact same game. Except then Auburn lost.
    Huh?
    It's really simple. Mike and I told you that Auburn is an 8-4 team, which they are, and you lost to them.

    Now you're super excited because Stanford lost to a 11-1 ND team to make yourself feel better.
    YOU DON'T GET THE THREAD
    Go ahead and bump this when Stanford beats CU in Santa Clara.
    If Stanford wins the Pac, I'll have to consider whether this was the worst Pac of all time.

    1999 is the gold standard though.
    Why do you hate 1-8 in bowl games last year, two 1st round QB's leaving, the hiring of Herm Edwards and Kevin Sumlin, and a projected starting QB committing suicide?

    I can think of no time when the conference was worse. The one decent OOC win will be ASU against a mediocre Sparty team in triple digit heat.

    UCLA is going Owen. The Beavs are going 1-1-11. UA is finishing with 2 or 3 wins. Colorado is the favorite to win the south. etc. Utah is going to struggle to win 6 games. USC is going to win the south with a 14 year old QB.

    It appeared 2016 would be the bottom of the barrel but it just keeps getting worse.
    Stanford lost to San Jose State and to Texas by 69-17 in 1999.

    The conference is really bad now, but 1999 was a magical season.
    Agreed. The final AP poll had only 1 Pac 10 team ranked (Oregon #19)
    Mosster was still catching goldfish during games in 99
    I was at every home game in 99. AJ was playing really well, until he wasn't. That 3OT game against SC was fucking bonkers. They won that game about seven times, until they didn't.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    ToiletBowl1983 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Mosster47 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Mosster47 said:

    It absolutely is, which isn't saying much. You guys act like Stanford is a super power.

    They've beaten Oregon a couple times and Iowa once.

    So you didn't see the plungering Stanford took tonight?
    Are we saying this Notre Dame squad wouldn't run a train on the Pac-12? Is that what we are saying?

    Stanford loses all the time. You act like them losing to a legit Top 10 on the road the week after they won a Top 25 miracle game is something crazy.
    Stanford has a number of teams in the past decade that wouldn't get plungered by this ND team.

    Even you know that's true.
    I don't know that. What year has Stanford not been plungered by someone?

    They always find a way.
    2015 and 2012 are the obvious ones but there are others.

    I'm sure this is the greatest ND team of your life also.
    Really don’t understand the giddy doogs after you lost to a VERY GOOD Auburn team.

    You pretty much lost the exact same game. Except then Auburn lost.
    Huh?
    It's really simple. Mike and I told you that Auburn is an 8-4 team, which they are, and you lost to them.

    Now you're super excited because Stanford lost to a 11-1 ND team to make yourself feel better.
    YOU DON'T GET THE THREAD
    Go ahead and bump this when Stanford beats CU in Santa Clara.
    If Stanford wins the Pac, I'll have to consider whether this was the worst Pac of all time.

    1999 is the gold standard though.
    Why do you hate 1-8 in bowl games last year, two 1st round QB's leaving, the hiring of Herm Edwards and Kevin Sumlin, and a projected starting QB committing suicide?

    I can think of no time when the conference was worse. The one decent OOC win will be ASU against a mediocre Sparty team in triple digit heat.

    UCLA is going Owen. The Beavs are going 1-1-11. UA is finishing with 2 or 3 wins. Colorado is the favorite to win the south. etc. Utah is going to struggle to win 6 games. USC is going to win the south with a 14 year old QB.

    It appeared 2016 would be the bottom of the barrel but it just keeps getting worse.
    Stanford lost to San Jose State and to Texas by 69-17 in 1999.

    The conference is really bad now, but 1999 was a magical season.
    Agreed. The final AP poll had only 1 Pac 10 team ranked (Oregon #19)
    Mosster was still catching goldfish during games in 99
    I was at every home game in 99. AJ was playing really well, until he wasn't. That 3OT game against SC was fucking bonkers. They won that game about seven times, until they didn't.
    Then you should remember what a historic dreckfest the Pac was.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    I do and it was only 10 shitty teams back then. It's 12 shitty teams now.

    The ceiling isn't any higher, the floor is lower.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    LOLOLOLOLOL

    @Mosster47
    @oregonblitzkrieg
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    haie said:

    LOLOLOLOLOL

    @Mosster47
    @oregonblitzkrieg

    You keep acting like Stanford has done something and hasn't lost crap games before.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    24 in the first half then pulled up like the losers they are.

    Almost a carbon copy against Cal.

    Hopefully they put a full game together one of these weeks. Doubt it’ll be against Washington though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    DoogCourics said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.

    Did you see how many points UCLA put up against Washington today? Man, really speaks VOLUMES about where those programs are headed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.

    Did you see how many points UCLA put up against Washington today? Man, really speaks VOLUMES about where those programs are headed.
    I did see it. It was horrifying. I feel for you since that’s what Oregon does on average.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited October 2018
    DoogCourics said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.

    Did you see how many points UCLA put up against Washington today? Man, really speaks VOLUMES about where those programs are headed.
    I did see it. It was horrifying. I feel for you since that’s what Oregon does on average.

    Does it speak VOLUMES though?


    I have a certain amount of empathy for you as well. Year 5, same as the other ones.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogCourics
    DoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.

    Did you see how many points UCLA put up against Washington today? Man, really speaks VOLUMES about where those programs are headed.
    I did see it. It was horrifying. I feel for you since that’s what Oregon does on average.

    Does it speak VOLUMES though?


    I have a certain amount of empathy for you as well. Year 5, same as the other ones.

    When you type in all caps, do you feel like it emphasizes the word the way you wanted it to?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    What a CF of dialogue and knowledge here

    Holy hell
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    DoogCourics said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    DoogCourics said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Oregon only scored 31 on this awful Stanford defense.

    Utah scored 40, and that’s double what they usually do.

    Speaks volumes.

    Did you see how many points UCLA put up against Washington today? Man, really speaks VOLUMES about where those programs are headed.
    I did see it. It was horrifying. I feel for you since that’s what Oregon does on average.

    Does it speak VOLUMES though?


    I have a certain amount of empathy for you as well. Year 5, same as the other ones.

    When you type in all caps, do you feel like it emphasizes the word the way you wanted it to?
    It was to emphasize that what you said was stupid.

    But you knew that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited October 2018
    haie said:

    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    LOLOLOLOLOL

    @Mosster47
    @oregonblitzkrieg

    You keep acting like Stanford has done something and hasn't lost crap games before.
    No. You keep acting like Stanford has done something.
    They do do something, usually every year. PAC 12 championship game wins and appearances. They play a brand of football most other teams in the PAC don't, and are always in the mix near the end of the season. UO recognized the best way forward is not to continue with the high octane smoke and mirrors, but to play Stanford (SEC) ball, and do it better than them going forward. Didn't happen this year due to some fluke plays, but that's the general idea.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    edited October 2018
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    haie said:

    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    LOLOLOLOLOL

    @Mosster47
    @oregonblitzkrieg

    You keep acting like Stanford has done something and hasn't lost crap games before.
    No. You keep acting like Stanford has done something.
    They do do something, usually every year. PAC 12 championship game wins and appearances. They play a brand of football most other teams in the PAC don't, and are always in the mix near the end of the season. UO recognized the best way forward is not to continue with the high octane smoke and mirrors, but to play Stanford (SEC) ball, and do it better than them going forward. Didn't happen this year due to some fluke plays, but that's the general idea.
    "SEC Football in the Pac 12" is a faggier image of your program than Crazy Larry. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    haie said:

    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    LOLOLOLOLOL

    @Mosster47
    @oregonblitzkrieg

    You keep acting like Stanford has done something and hasn't lost crap games before.
    No. You keep acting like Stanford has done something.
    They do do something, usually every year. PAC 12 championship game wins and appearances. They play a brand of football most other teams in the PAC don't, and are always in the mix near the end of the season. UO recognized the best way forward is not to continue with the high octane smoke and mirrors, but to play Stanford (SEC) ball, and do it better than them going forward. Didn't happen this year due to some fluke plays, but that's the general idea.
    Does Stanford respect Oregon tho?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter