Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition

1910111214

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    It’s just a complete mockery of the judicial system that a potential member of the highest court has to lie to earn his place though. Just pick another one of the damned candidates already and move on. Fucking disgracing the good names of boofing, Devil’s Triangle, and everything else young Americans hold dear...
    I can't form a position on any of this until I know what he wrote in his high school yearbook.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/the-on-deck-justice-could-be-a-bigger-dem-problem-than-kavanaugh-kennedy

    While I'd love to see nuclear levels of shaking and vomiting from the left over the "on deck" candidate, rewarding the left's hit job tactics would be highly dangerous and completely unacceptable.
    Democrats are betting 2 things.

    1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.

    2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.

    I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Democrats are betting 2 things.

    1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.

    2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.

    I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    2001400ex said:

    Democrats are betting 2 things.

    1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.

    2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.

    I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats.
    I don't ever recall the Republicans claiming people would die if the Wise Latina was allowed to be on the SC.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    I don't ever recall the Republicans claiming people would die if the Wise Latina was allowed to be on the SC.
    You act like Democrats have a monopoly on saying stupid shit. You just elect a president that says stupid shit on a daily basis.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    edited September 2018
    2001400ex said:

    You act like Democrats have a monopoly on saying stupid shit. You just elect a president that says stupid shit on a daily basis.
    You act like you're incapable of responding to what the other person actually says and respond by fucking strawman ass when someone says something that makes your snatch hurt.

    Your claim Kunt was that Republicans get more "riled up" about Justices than Rats. Telling me that Trump says stupid shit doesn't even address what I said nor does it support the fucking bogus claim you initially made. You suck at this Hondo.

    Do you have learning disability? I'm serious. Some form of ADD or autistic?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    You act like you're incapable of responding to what the other person actually says and respond by fucking strawman ass when someone says something that makes your snatch hurt.

    Your claim Kunt was that Republicans get more "riled up" about Justices than Rats. Telling me that Trump says stupid shit doesn't even address what I said nor does it support the fucking bogus claim you initially made. You suck at this Hondo.

    Do you have learning disability? I'm serious. Some form of ADD or autistic?
    photo FCDDD854-5EC3-4853-86B7-B9C423C276D9_zpskvki3gvf.gif
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    Predictable, run your twat of a mouth, and then perform your Kunt act when you're asked to back it up.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Predictable, run your twat of a mouth, and then perform your Kunt act when you're asked to back it up.

    I have explained why I say that multiple times. When you ignore what I say or just flat can't read it. Multiple times. I'm resigned to just posting funny pictures. Cause that you might get.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    2001400ex said:

    I have explained why I say that multiple times. When you ignore what I say or just flat can't read it. Multiple times. I'm resigned to just posting funny pictures. Cause that you might get.
    Which is also part of your Kunt act. Claim you're already responded to it and then say the other person just doesn't understand you. Fucking liar. Go ahead Kunt, quote from this thread where you addresses what I said. You fucked strawman ass and then performed your Kunt act.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    2001400ex said:

    Democrats are betting 2 things.

    1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.

    2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.

    I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats.
    The answer is right here.
  • ThebourbinatorThebourbinator Member Posts: 664
    SFGbob said:

    Which is also part of your Kunt act. Claim you're already responded to it and then say the other person just doesn't understand you. Fucking liar. Go ahead Kunt, quote from this thread where you addresses what I said. You fucked strawman ass and then performed your Kunt act.
    Can’t quite put my hands on it... was it a stroke, or do you have Tourette’s?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,877 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    You act like Democrats have a monopoly on saying stupid shit. You just elect a president that says stupid shit on a daily basis.
    But, but, but, TRUMP!
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club
    Cory Booker loves to hear himself talk. Kreist. What a douchecanoe.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    AZDuck said:

    lol

    it's like you've never seen a jury trial before
    Huh?
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,896
    AZDuck said:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    you clearly know nothing about polygraphs

    The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.

    Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."

    Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question.
    She clearly experienced this. I’m just not sure That Kavanaugh was the dude on top of her.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited September 2018
    No. Nothing is clear. Dr. ford MUST be questioned by the FBI without council.

    Any so called facts she has claimed have been denied under penalty of felony by all witnesses she has named.

    Why did she lie while stalling the committee? Not once, but many times.

    Why did she scrub her social media? Who did it for her? Who paid for it?

    What does her social media say? What about HER acquaintances, past boyfriends. What do they say?

    Some might fine athletes that never made it to the NFL. Same with actresses and movies.

    Facts that we know so far seem more likely to indicate a well a well coordinated #metoo hit

    These questions are better

    http://ace.mu.nu/archives/377326.php
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Well that is factually correct. However he forgets that it's closer to equal in the house. But still not fully equal. Look at 2012, Democrats had more votes for the house but didn't have control of the house. The system is slanted to give the large land mass with low population states higher representation per capita than areas of high population. Which was designed that way on purpose so places like New York don't dominate policy for the entire country.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,684 Standard Supporter
    Righto, you dumbfuck.

    We ? don't live in a democracy. Never have.





Sign In or Register to comment.