Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Official game day thread Kavanaugh edition
Comments
-
The answer is right here.2001400ex said:
Democrats are betting 2 things.Southerndawg said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/the-on-deck-justice-could-be-a-bigger-dem-problem-than-kavanaugh-kennedyThebourbinator said:
It’s just a complete mockery of the judicial system that a potential member of the highest court has to lie to earn his place though. Just pick another one of the damned candidates already and move on. Fucking disgracing the good names of boofing, Devil’s Triangle, and everything else young Americans hold dear...Swaye said:
I agree. Of course he has been black out drunk. Everyone has. And nobody should care, but everyone would have. The Dems would have used his truthful response to say "see, he did assault her and is just too drunk to remember." I would have lied just like he did not because I like lying but because it is obvious how they were trying to set him up.Thebourbinator said:Too many pages to read, but the biggest crock of shit is his statements on drinking. I’m not gonna sit here and say he did or didn’t sexually assault her or others, but to say he’s never been black out drunk, and that people can’t binge drink and be successful is a bold faced lie, but everyone is going to go with it and say he’s credible because they did the same thing and want to pretend that they are fucking saints. Just be honest about that and maybe I would believe you on the other shit you jackass. Fucking oligarchy...
Some people may not like that, but guess what, at a Witch trial you best not claim to own a broom.
While I'd love to see nuclear levels of shaking and vomiting from the left over the "on deck" candidate, rewarding the left's hit job tactics would be highly dangerous and completely unacceptable.
1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.
2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.
I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats. -
Can’t quite put my hands on it... was it a stroke, or do you have Tourette’s?SFGbob said:
Which is also part of your Kunt act. Claim you're already responded to it and then say the other person just doesn't understand you. Fucking liar. Go ahead Kunt, quote from this thread where you addresses what I said. You fucked strawman ass and then performed your Kunt act.2001400ex said:
I have explained why I say that multiple times. When you ignore what I say or just flat can't read it. Multiple times. I'm resigned to just posting funny pictures. Cause that you might get.SFGbob said:Predictable, run your twat of a mouth, and then perform your Kunt act when you're asked to back it up.
-
But, but, but, TRUMP!2001400ex said:
You act like Democrats have a monopoly on saying stupid shit. You just elect a president that says stupid shit on a daily basis.SFGbob said:
I don't ever recall the Republicans claiming people would die if the Wise Latina was allowed to be on the SC.2001400ex said:
Democrats are betting 2 things.Southerndawg said:
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/the-on-deck-justice-could-be-a-bigger-dem-problem-than-kavanaugh-kennedyThebourbinator said:
It’s just a complete mockery of the judicial system that a potential member of the highest court has to lie to earn his place though. Just pick another one of the damned candidates already and move on. Fucking disgracing the good names of boofing, Devil’s Triangle, and everything else young Americans hold dear...Swaye said:
I agree. Of course he has been black out drunk. Everyone has. And nobody should care, but everyone would have. The Dems would have used his truthful response to say "see, he did assault her and is just too drunk to remember." I would have lied just like he did not because I like lying but because it is obvious how they were trying to set him up.Thebourbinator said:Too many pages to read, but the biggest crock of shit is his statements on drinking. I’m not gonna sit here and say he did or didn’t sexually assault her or others, but to say he’s never been black out drunk, and that people can’t binge drink and be successful is a bold faced lie, but everyone is going to go with it and say he’s credible because they did the same thing and want to pretend that they are fucking saints. Just be honest about that and maybe I would believe you on the other shit you jackass. Fucking oligarchy...
Some people may not like that, but guess what, at a Witch trial you best not claim to own a broom.
While I'd love to see nuclear levels of shaking and vomiting from the left over the "on deck" candidate, rewarding the left's hit job tactics would be highly dangerous and completely unacceptable.
1) Republicans can't get another person nominated and confirmed by November elections.
2) this whole scenario will rile up the Democrat base to vote, who historically don't show up in mid term elections.
I think the first one is valid. The second one could backfire as that was one of the reasons that Trump won. Conservatives get more riled up about justices than Democrats. -
Cory Booker loves to hear himself talk. Kreist. What a douchecanoe.
-
She clearly experienced this. I’m just not sure That Kavanaugh was the dude on top of her.AZDuck said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASledog said:
Her polygraph test was a joke. Complete utter foolishness. Two questions and they were not specific. Polygraph tests require specific single subject questions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Be a better poasterAZDuck said:
you clearly know nothing about polygraphs
The SOP is to ask the examinee a bunch of questions that are obvious "yes" or "no" questions that are irrelevant to the topic.
Then the polygrapher asks a VERY LIMITED number of questions, usually no more than 2-4... and the polygraph will hit or not hit on "deceptive response."
Too many questions and the machine will start hitting or not hitting on every question. -
No. Nothing is clear. Dr. ford MUST be questioned by the FBI without council.
Any so called facts she has claimed have been denied under penalty of felony by all witnesses she has named.
Why did she lie while stalling the committee? Not once, but many times.
Why did she scrub her social media? Who did it for her? Who paid for it?
What does her social media say? What about HER acquaintances, past boyfriends. What do they say?
Some might fine athletes that never made it to the NFL. Same with actresses and movies.
Facts that we know so far seem more likely to indicate a well a well coordinated #metoo hit
These questions are better
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/377326.php -
Random terrible take
-
Well that is factually correct. However he forgets that it's closer to equal in the house. But still not fully equal. Look at 2012, Democrats had more votes for the house but didn't have control of the house. The system is slanted to give the large land mass with low population states higher representation per capita than areas of high population. Which was designed that way on purpose so places like New York don't dominate policy for the entire country.GrundleStiltzkin said:Random terrible take
-
Righto, you dumbfuck.GrundleStiltzkin said:Random terrible take
We ? don't live in a democracy. Never have.
-
Representative republic.PurpleThrobber said:
Righto, you dumbfuck.GrundleStiltzkin said:Random terrible take
We ? don't live in a democracy. Never have. -
We sure do. That's why they have more house seats. HTHGrundleStiltzkin said:Random terrible take
-
No, Hondo is correct; we’re a Representative Republic.Sledog said:
We sure do. That's why they have more house seats. HTHGrundleStiltzkin said:Random terrible take
-
Representative Republic during the age of the internet should be considered third world country status imo.
-
Good luck getting 2/3 of the states to agree on giving more power to the coastal states.Gwad said:Representative Republic during the age of the internet should be considered third world country status imo.
Outside of that, I agree. -
Disagree. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner. Our system isn’t perfect but it does make it incredibly difficult to take away someone’s rights; as it should.Gwad said:Representative Republic during the age of the internet should be considered third world country status imo.
-
No socialism etc. is 3rd world and down.Gwad said:Representative Republic during the age of the internet should be considered third world country status imo.
-
Kav will be approved. Next the old hag needs to die and Trump send the third person to the SC
