Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Burden of proof is on you DiFi to prove you didn't leak it
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,219
in Tug Tavern
That's the new standard the Rats have created, have fun living with it Rats.
Comments
-
This is the editor of the paper that published the leaked document:
I don't think DiFi reads these boreds -
Ford, Ford's attorney's as recommended by DiFi, and DiFi/DiFi staff are all sources of the leak. Who benefitted most from it? What possible motive would the leaker have for delaying the leak until very near the mid-term elections? Hmmm.
-
Nor is she particularly cognizant of her surroundings.AZDuck said:This is the editor of the paper that published the leaked document:
I don't think DiFi reads these boreds
-
Sorry, a simple denial isn't good enough. She needs to prove she didn't do it.AZDuck said:This is the editor of the paper that published the leaked document:
I don't think DiFi reads these boreds -
She is a sitting US Senator. Why should the standards of proof be any different? Is there a different standard for a Secretary of State nominee?AZDuck said: -
I was 81% sure your respons was gonna be "that's the joke"SFGbob said:
She is a sitting US Senator. Why should the standards of proof be any different? Is there a different standard for a Secretary of State nominee?AZDuck said: -
kill yourself faggotAZDuck said: -
All of this time and you still don't know me, I'm hurt.AZDuck said:
I was 81% sure your respons was gonna be "that's the joke"SFGbob said:
She is a sitting US Senator. Why should the standards of proof be any different? Is there a different standard for a Secretary of State nominee?AZDuck said:
