Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

She-Guevara racist white nationalist

11617192122

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Call me a liberal. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell, you're a giant faggot, and I have a good sense from your writings about your other values too. If the label fits, wear it. IDGAF.

    It was important. A grown man, at night, stalks an unarmed kid doing nothing wrong, chases him when he runs away, nobody sees what happens next, and you and your idiot buddies think all that matters is the imbecile responsible for 99.9% of the entire thing turned out to be a shitty fighter and got his ass kicked by a kid doing what most of us would might well have done in the same situation. And you both lack any intellectual flexibility to see any side of this but the one that fits your political agenda, and then whine like a bitch that the matter was politicized by the other guy. It's just too fucking rich.

    You are a special kind of candy ass and would do everyone a favor by hanging yourself.
    "Stalks, runs after him when he runs away, weird how you left off stops running about 10 seconds later. 99.9% responsible" But Coug never claimed Zimmerman "started" the fight and I lack the intellectual flexibility?

    There was a fucking trial, all of your bullshit was addressed and rejected by the jury.

    What's my political agenda in this matter Coug? Don't hurt yourself dodging the question Kunt.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    "Stalks, runs after him when he runs away, weird how you left off stops running about 10 seconds later. 99.9% responsible" But Coug never claimed Zimmerman "started" the fight and I lack the intellectual flexibility?

    There was a fucking trial, all of your bullshit was addressed and rejected by the jury.

    What's my political agenda in this matter Coug? Don't hurt yourself dodging the question Kunt.
    OJ was acquitted as well.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2018

    Maybe you and Sled are giant pussies and have never been in an altercation. Punching someone who was threatening you doesn't make you a thug whether the guy could handle himself or, like Zimmerman, could not. I'm starting to see why you two identify with Zimmerman so much.

    Sad.
    And now he knows that Zimmerman was threatening Trademark. But you're not claiming Zimmerman "started" the fight right Coug? He is just 99.9% responsible and he "instigated" it and he "stalked" him but he didn't "start" the fight, right Kunt?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    And now he knows that Zimmerman was threatening Trademark. But you're not claiming Zimmerman "started" the fight right Coug? He is just 99.9% responsible and he "instigated" it and he "stalked" him but he didn't "start" the fight, right Kunt?
    In summary:

    Fat fucking hapless fools who murder unarmed minors under the guise of “neighborhood watch” make you very happy. The victims deserve it

    You’ve never been in a physical altercation in your life life.

    You are giant fucking coward.

    Juries sometimes acquit murderers.

    That about covers this thread.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    In summary:

    Fat fucking hapless fools who murder unarmed minors under the guise of “neighborhood watch” make you very happy. The victims deserve it

    You’ve never been in a physical altercation in your life life.

    You are giant fucking coward.

    Juries sometimes acquit murderers.

    That about covers this thread.

    And Bob is a liar.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,290 Standard Supporter

    Maybe you and Sled are giant pussies and have never been in an altercation. Punching someone who was threatening you doesn't make you a thug whether the guy could handle himself or, like Zimmerman, could not. I'm starting to see why you two identify with Zimmerman so much.

    Sad.
    No it makes you guilty of battery. HTH
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,290 Standard Supporter

    Maybe you and Sled are giant pussies and have never been in an altercation. Punching someone who was threatening you doesn't make you a thug whether the guy could handle himself or, like Zimmerman, could not. I'm starting to see why you two identify with Zimmerman so much.

    Sad.
    Yeah all the tough guys are attorneys!
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    Sledog said:

    No it makes you guilty of battery. HTH
    Not necessarily. HtH
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    SFGbob said:

    And now he knows that Zimmerman was threatening Trademark. But you're not claiming Zimmerman "started" the fight right Coug? He is just 99.9% responsible and he "instigated" it and he "stalked" him but he didn't "start" the fight, right Kunt?
    What a moron. Recycle the same shit that's been handed back to you and shoved up your ass 20x and ways.

    Sad that you and Lenny struggle with basic English words and reading comprehension.

    Sad, really.

    But you use tuff words so you have that.

    Dumb shit
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    What a moron. Recycle the same shit that's been handed back to you and shoved up your ass 20x and ways.

    Sad that you and Lenny struggle with basic English words and reading comprehension.

    Sad, really.

    But you use tuff words so you have that.

    Dumb shit
    Yeah, it's so unfair to quote your own words back to you.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    SFGbob said:

    Yeah, it's so unfair to quote your own words back to you.
    It's not quoting words that makes you a dumb shit. It's the lack of understanding the meaning of those words and how they're used in context with other words. It's your penchant for starting with an emotionally soothing conclusion and saying and repeating and doing ad nauseam anything required to stay there. It's the demonstrated intellectual inflexibility or inability to move a slight inch away from even the most absurd positions in the face of cogent or at least reasonable explanations or considerations. These are the expressed characteristics that make you and your bro' Sledog imbeciles. He's a monkey, and apparently so are you.

    You say I say shit I don't say to construct arguments that lose to yours, even though those arguments don't exist. I clarify it 20x, and you just say it again, as if you can't help yourself. That, or like so many people, you can't say out loud (without a therapist's help), "you may have a point there." You articulate the most extreme bias and are completely dumbfounded that anyone would notice or call you out for it. Worst of all, you hide from difficult or inconvenient points like a scared little girl.

    I don't hate you because you're dumb. People like you and dummy #2 tend to come from low income backgrounds and have parents with limited educations. Only a small % wind up punching outside of their socioeconomic weight class, so no shame there. I hate you because you're a cowardly punk. I gave you an out: rope is cheap.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,290 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2018

    Not necessarily. HtH
    How does assaulting someone who is watching you and asking a question legal in your world? Self defense of course but the physical evidence we have available doesn't lend any support to that theory.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    Sledog said:

    How does assaulting someone who is watching you and asking a question legal in your world? Self defense of course but the physical evidence we have available doesn't lend any support to that theory.
    How does a 17-year old physically defending himself against a strange armed man who'd been pursuing and eventually chasing him at night constitute an unprovoked attack in your world? Assault and battery can happen of course, but the evidence we have available doesn't really lend itself to that theory.

    Just because the kid was successful in beating up a guy who, for all knew, was a perv or a serial killer, does not mean that he attacked the guy without provocation. You weren't there; nor was anybody else when the physical altercation began. For all we know, Z made the first move. That it was ineffective is irrelevant. My brother used to swing at me when we were kids; but he was slow and shitty at fighting and never landed a shot. Zimmerman seems to be in that class.

    The only thing you have is Zimmerman's version of the story, and he is a less-than-credible witness. But he was in the right county.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 20,027 Standard Supporter



    It's not quoting words that makes you a dumb shit. It's the lack of understanding the meaning of those words and how they're used in context with other words. It's your penchant for starting with an emotionally soothing conclusion and saying and repeating and doing ad nauseam anything required to stay there. It's the demonstrated intellectual inflexibility or inability to move a slight inch away from even the most absurd positions in the face of cogent or at least reasonable explanations or considerations. These are the expressed characteristics that make you and your bro' Sledog imbeciles. He's a monkey, and apparently so are you.

    You say I say shit I don't say to construct arguments that lose to yours, even though those arguments don't exist. I clarify it 20x, and you just say it again, as if you can't help yourself. That, or like so many people, you can't say out loud (without a therapist's help), "you may have a point there." You articulate the most extreme bias and are completely dumbfounded that anyone would notice or call you out for it. Worst of all, you hide from difficult or inconvenient points like a scared little girl.

    I don't hate you because you're dumb. People like you and dummy #2 tend to come from low income backgrounds and have parents with limited educations. Only a small % wind up punching outside of their socioeconomic weight class, so no shame there. I hate you because you're a cowardly punk. I gave you an out: rope is cheap.
    @creepycoug: You had me at dumb. Don't lose me by going all Cirrho with his online university/mall-rat quality jerbs about uneducated white trash - from which he obviously came.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012

    @creepycoug: You had me at dumb. Don't lose me by going all Cirrho with his online university/mall-rat quality jerbs about uneducated white trash - from which he obviously came.
    Just a little salt.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 20,027 Standard Supporter

    Just a little salt.
    Keepin' it Real.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    How does a 17-year old physically defending himself against a strange armed man who'd been pursuing and eventually chasing him at night constitute an unprovoked attack in your world?

    Yeah, but Coug isn't saying that Zimmerman started the fight. And just how exactly did Trademark know that Zimmerman was armed? For all Zimmerman knew Trademark was armed. The one thing we do know, is that Zimmerman had every reason to believe that the police would be there any second and that every action he took might possibly be witnessed by the police and the people living in the units near where the fight started when Zimmerman started calling for help.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183



    It's not quoting words that makes you a dumb shit. It's the lack of understanding the meaning of those words and how they're used in context with other words. It's your penchant for starting with an emotionally soothing conclusion and saying and repeating and doing ad nauseam anything required to stay there. It's the demonstrated intellectual inflexibility or inability to move a slight inch away from even the most absurd positions in the face of cogent or at least reasonable explanations or considerations. These are the expressed characteristics that make you and your bro' Sledog imbeciles. He's a monkey, and apparently so are you.

    You say I say shit I don't say to construct arguments that lose to yours, even though those arguments don't exist. I clarify it 20x, and you just say it again, as if you can't help yourself. That, or like so many people, you can't say out loud (without a therapist's help), "you may have a point there." You articulate the most extreme bias and are completely dumbfounded that anyone would notice or call you out for it. Worst of all, you hide from difficult or inconvenient points like a scared little girl.

    I don't hate you because you're dumb. People like you and dummy #2 tend to come from low income backgrounds and have parents with limited educations. Only a small % wind up punching outside of their socioeconomic weight class, so no shame there. I hate you because you're a cowardly punk. I gave you an out: rope is cheap.
    What a long winded fucking blow hard you are Coug. Zimmerman is 99.9 responsible for the fight according to Coug, he "instigated" it and and he "stalked" him but according to you, you're not claiming he "started" the fight. All that education and you ended up being a dishonest hack.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    SFGbob said:

    What a long winded fucking blow hard you are Coug. Zimmerman is 99.9 responsible for the fight according to Coug, he "instigated" it and and he "stalked" him but according to you, you're not claiming he "started" the fight. All that education and you ended up being a dishonest hack.
    Words and English. They're super hard sometimes for some people.

    Asked and answered > than 20x, and you still don't get it because of your intellectual deficiencies and limited command over what is no doubt the only language you know. This thing is as played out as can be. Least I can do for your sorry ass is give you the last word.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,012
    SFGbob said:

    How does a 17-year old physically defending himself against a strange armed man who'd been pursuing and eventually chasing him at night constitute an unprovoked attack in your world?

    Yeah, but Coug isn't saying that Zimmerman started the fight. And just how exactly did Trademark know that Zimmerman was armed? For all Zimmerman knew Trademark was armed. The one thing we do know, is that Zimmerman had every reason to believe that the police would be there any second and that every action he took might possibly be witnessed by the police and the people living in the units near where the fight started when Zimmerman started calling for help.

    Correct. I have no way of knowing that George did or did not brandish his weapon. See? That's how you acknowledge reality as an adult. What about the rest of it? Oh, yeah, nevermind. This applies here too:

    Words and English. They're super hard sometimes for some people.

    Asked and answered > than 20x, and you still don't get it because of your intellectual deficiencies and limited command over what is no doubt the only language you know. This thing is as played out as can be. Least I can do for your sorry ass is give you the last word.
Sign In or Register to comment.