Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

She-Guevara racist white nationalist

11618202122

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008

    Because they both caught the attention of the White House

    Go back 27 pages and that's how this started

    Obama picking the wrong horses to ride on his social justice kick
    And @SFGbob is selling you a bag of shit. It was this comparison by Bob to which I made reference:

    He armed himself with the sidewalk that he smashed Zimmerman's head into. I guess Mike Brown couldn't have been the aggressor either since he too was unarmed.

    Of course, we know that there were just a few differences, starting with the facts that Brown was dealing with police officers, had tried to wrestle away an officer's weapon, failed to obey and order to stand down, and had earlier in the day committed a robbery. Martin, by comparison, was walking and had a track record of acting tuff and smoking weed!!!!!

    I wonder why Bob thinks Brown and Martin are comparable dead black boys?

    Dances right on the line and begs to be called a racist, and then loses his shit when someone does.

    I don't need to go there.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,808 Founders Club
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2018

    You're such a dufus. I didn't write any of that. Try reading this part again dumb dumb:

    The only thing we don't know ... at all ... is whether Zimmerman gave up the stalk and was withdrawing and was attacked by Martin ... effectively a reversal of what Zimmerman started. Zero evidence. All the evidence relates to Zimmerman the instigator. All of it. The rest of it is simply biased conjecture.

    Translation: we don't know the version of this that you and Bob want to be true (Trayvon the attacker). There is evidence, however, that Zimmerman was the instigator. "Instigator" does not translate in Engrish to "Attacker". @TurdBuffer , a little help here?

    Who cares about the pictures? So you're saying the left politicized the event? Like the right politicized the last time some illegal killed someone? You don't say? Pretty insightful.

    You and Bob are struggling with some basic thought process here, so Creep's gonna help you out:

    Person A instigates, provokes or causes a fight with person B, but nobody is around to see this stage of the altercation. (Some evidence for this version).

    Person B winds up getting the better of Person A. (We all know this happened).

    When people start showing up, they see Person B getting the better of Person A. (We all know this happened).

    [And this is the important part!]: Person B attacked Person A. (Sled and Bob enthusiastically jump right to this conclusion).

    Person B is now justified in killing Person A. (Sled and Bob really like this result because Martin was a thug, there had been robberies in the neighborhood, etc.).

    That's your logic.

    This case is all about what we don't know and is the only explanation one could have for acquitting Zimmerman.

    Of course assholes like you and Bob were raised to angle against Martin every modicum of conjecture you can gather, and at the same time feel absolutely no obligation to consider Zimmerman's role or motives - even though we learned that Zimmerman is a bigger piece of shit than was Martin, the latter of whom at least had youth on his side as a mitigating factor. You and Bob can figure out why you do that; IDRGAF.

    One of the (many) big differences between you and me is that I can question and see a thing for what it is, even if something doesn't fall the way I'd like it to, accept it, admit it, and emotionally move on with life. You, by contrast, cannot seem to do any of that and are an emotional child.

    But I still love you man.

    For some strange reason there is only one side to this story besides partial witness accounts that seem to corroborate Zimmerman's story. No physical eveidence of any kind including autopsy to show Zim attacked Tray. Could you convict him in court? Florida couldn't. You can insert whatever your thoughts are on the board but try and stick to allowable pertinent evidence. HTH
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    edited September 2018

    Pressing

    hardly. this has been an exercise in indulgence for me. could have stopped long ago. I just like giving the stupid more opportunity to show stupid. it's a vice.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Are you a strawman ass fucking dipshit because you're a barely functioning moron? Trademark wasn't unarmed anymore than the Gentle Giant was unarmed.
    Did Trayvon have a gun or is he trained in martial arts? No. Right sugar bear?

    Fuck it's like talking to a deaf monkey.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    "Takes the cake" Brutal fucking rebuttal Hondo. You fucking destroyed my claim. Btw, how brainwashed to do you have to be in order to think that the photos I posted weren't Trademark?
    For the 14th fucking time. I asked for a link. I did my research. I never once said the ones you posted weren't him (sledog is another matter). I did laugh at you tho how you think his gold teeth somehow make him armed or some shit.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    Sledog said:

    For some strange reason there is only one side to this story besides partial witness accounts that seem to corroborate Zimmerman's story. No physical eveidence of any kind including autopsy to show Zim attacked Tray. Could you convict him in court? Florida couldn't. You can insert whatever your thoughts are on the board but try and stick to allowable pertinent evidence. HTH
    - Huh? There is the side that is beyond dispute: the pursuer, instigator and escalator of the whole evening's events was Zimmeran. We know exactly that.
    - What kind of evidence would necessarily be on a dead person that would establish which person first physically attacked another? Nobody saw that part; we all know that. Thanks for the report on wet water. We do know that Zimmerman was a shitty fighter. Should we then be surprised to learn that Martin didn't absorb a punch? How does this establish that Zimmerman didn't swing at him and miss? Or that he didn't lunge at him and cause Martin to defend himself (well)? Or that Martin didn't reasonably defend himself when he saw this grown man running after him? Huh?
    - Doesn't really matter; as the a jury person, I would have had trouble with the fact that Zimmerman was doing the shit he was doing that would put any person in reasonable apprehension of harm. But the burden of proof goes the other way, and the dearth of witness testimony of who started the altercation is what saved Zimmerman. The only thing anyone saw or heard was the part of Martin getting the better of Zimmerman.
    - The content of the jury matters. Zimmerman was in a good place to have this happen.
    - Are you able to track this ok?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2018
    Zimmerman did noting illegal.

    Injuries of some sort are often left during an assault.

    I thought court was about facts not conjecture.

    Obviously I've been in actual courts and you've been where?

    - Doesn't really matter; as the a jury person, I would have had trouble with the fact that Zimmerman was doing the shit he was doing that would put any person in reasonable apprehension of harm. But the burden of proof goes the other way, and the dearth of witness testimony of who started the altercation is what saved Zimmerman. The only thing anyone saw or heard was the part of Martin getting the better of Zimmerman.

    Engrish prease.

    Oh and it is dangerous to be a thug.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Nice summary.

    Obama on Martin: appropriate.

    Obama on Brown: mistake.

    Obama responsible for racial tension the US: laffable.

    Fanned the Flames: ok, sure, I guess.
    Obama responsible for racial tension? No. Obama responsible for exacerbating racial tension? Fuck yes. That's what Community Organizers do. Rabble rouse. Tell people that racist white bankers aren't willing to give you a mortgage because you're black. Tell people that racist white cops have declared "open season" on young black males. Hire Al Sharpton to work in your White House.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    edited September 2018
    Sledog said:

    Zimmerman did noting illegal.

    Injuries of some sort are often left during an assault. Not always. They clearly were in a fight as people saw Martin getting the better of him. And Martin had no marks other than what was on his hand. Ostensibly, then, it can happen rather easily, depending on the matchup. Like this one.

    I thought court was about facts not conjecture. Circumstantial evidence has been used to send people to the chair. Facts are established by a preponderance of evidence. Sometimes, they are established by appealing to bias. Since you have been in court, you know that everything that is alleged to have happened is rarely done so with 100%, incontrovertible, video evidence. The fact that Zimmerman was chasing Martin doesn't mean anything to you means that you would have been a great juror for Zimmerman. Maybe if the kid in question had been someone that made you less culturally uncomfortable, you might have been more objective. In any event, you misapprehend my use of the term conjecture because you don't read well.

    Obviously I've been in actual courts and you've been where? As I mentioned in another post, I generally value staying out of jail, and I value my professional reputation. So I try not to break the law and wind up in court. Maybe you need to re-evaluate your priorities. Or don't. IDRGAF

    - Doesn't really matter; as the a jury person, I would have had trouble with the fact that Zimmerman was doing the shit he was doing that would put any person in reasonable apprehension of harm. You didn't understand that? But the burden of proof goes the other way, and the dearth of witness testimony of who started the altercation is what saved Zimmerman. You didn't understand that either?The only thing anyone saw or heard was the part of Martin getting the better of Zimmerman. And this, too, confused you? I guess you and Bob had the same shit parents. Education matters boy. Try and do better with your kids, if there's time.

    Engrish prease.

    Oh and it is dangerous to be a thug. An entirely reasonable thing to say. Except Zimmerman didn't know he was a thug. Or did he? How so?

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    And @SFGbob is selling you a bag of shit. It was this comparison by Bob to which I made reference:

    He armed himself with the sidewalk that he smashed Zimmerman's head into. I guess Mike Brown couldn't have been the aggressor either since he too was unarmed.

    Of course, we know that there were just a few differences, starting with the facts that Brown was dealing with police officers, had tried to wrestle away an officer's weapon, failed to obey and order to stand down, and had earlier in the day committed a robbery. Martin, by comparison, was walking and had a track record of acting tuff and smoking weed!!!!!

    I wonder why Bob thinks Brown and Martin are comparable dead black boys?

    Dances right on the line and begs to be called a racist, and then loses his shit when someone does.

    I don't need to go there.
    I made the comparison dumbass because Hondo thought that piece of information was important. The fact someone doesn't have a gun doesn't make them non-violent.

    Call me a racist. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell you're a liberal, it's got to be killing you that you haven't already done so.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    I made the comparison dumbass because Hondo thought that piece of information was important. The fact someone doesn't have a gun doesn't make them non-violent.

    Call me a racist. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell you're a liberal, it's got to be killing you that you haven't already done so.
    Know nothing about you?

    You’ve shown what you are.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    For the 14th fucking time. I asked for a link. I did my research. I never once said the ones you posted weren't him (sledog is another matter). I did laugh at you tho how you think his gold teeth somehow make him armed or some shit.
    You didn't just ask for a link you fucking liar.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    You didn't just ask for a link you fucking liar.
    photo B97103C3-9DB3-401B-B9A0-8DEB88933211_zpszvui9xpd.gif
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    As soon as he punched him in the nose I'm sure Zimmerman figured out that Trademark was a thug.

    Trayvon's friends knew the path he was on. They warned him that he should stop picking fights before someone shot him in the chest.

    Prophetic

    George Zimmerman's defense team is painting an unflattering picture of Trayvon Martin through his text messages, which it released yesterday—and they contain a haunting warning from a friend: "Boy don’t get one planted in ya chest," the friend writes. The text came three months before Trayvon was shot,
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,987 Standard Supporter

    Zimmerman had no marks on his hands. Check the evidence photos.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    SFGbob said:

    As soon as he punched him in the nose I'm sure Zimmerman figured out that Trademark was a thug.

    Trayvon's friends knew the path he was on. They warned him that he should stop picking fights before someone shot him in the chest.

    Prophetic

    George Zimmerman's defense team is painting an unflattering picture of Trayvon Martin through his text messages, which it released yesterday—and they contain a haunting warning from a friend: "Boy don’t get one planted in ya chest," the friend writes. The text came three months before Trayvon was shot,
    Maybe you and Sled are giant pussies and have never been in an altercation. Punching someone who was threatening you doesn't make you a thug whether the guy could handle himself or, like Zimmerman, could not. I'm starting to see why you two identify with Zimmerman so much.

    Sad.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 24,008
    SFGbob said:

    I made the comparison dumbass because Hondo thought that piece of information was important. The fact someone doesn't have a gun doesn't make them non-violent.

    Call me a racist. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell you're a liberal, it's got to be killing you that you haven't already done so.
    SFGbob said:

    I made the comparison dumbass because Hondo thought that piece of information was important. The fact someone doesn't have a gun doesn't make them non-violent.

    Call me a racist. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell you're a liberal, it's got to be killing you that you haven't already done so.
    Call me a liberal. I don't give a shit. You know nothing about me. Hell, you're a giant faggot, and I have a good sense from your writings about your other values too. If the label fits, wear it. IDGAF.

    It was important. A grown man, at night, stalks an unarmed kid doing nothing wrong, chases him when he runs away, nobody sees what happens next, and you and your idiot buddies think all that matters is the imbecile responsible for 99.9% of the entire thing turned out to be a shitty fighter and got his ass kicked by a kid doing what most of us would might well have done in the same situation. And you both lack any intellectual flexibility to see any side of this but the one that fits your political agenda, and then whine like a bitch that the matter was politicized by the other guy. It's just too fucking rich.

    You are a special kind of candy ass and would do everyone a favor by hanging yourself.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Such fag Bob outed as a liar again. I always wonder why you never post links.... Well I don't really wonder. It's cause you are a liar. And you've obviously never had friends or people you joke around with.

    "So you just turning into a lil hoodlum," one friend, whose name has been withheld, texted Trayvon.

    Trayvon replied: "No not at all."

    At one point, Trayvon joked that the friend was "soft."

    "Boy don't get one planted in ya chest," the friend joked back.


    https://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/in-trayvon-martins-text-messages-talk-of-marijuana-fights-and-guns/2122811

    Also later on they talk about the gold teeth.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Maybe you and Sled are giant pussies and have never been in an altercation. Punching someone who was threatening you doesn't make you a thug whether the guy could handle himself or, like Zimmerman, could not. I'm starting to see why you two identify with Zimmerman so much.

    Sad.
    I love how Coug plays both sides of the fence. We can't really know what happened, be he "knows" Zimmerman was threatening Trademark.
Sign In or Register to comment.