Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
ESPN thinks we have a shot at a rematch with PSU or Bama, puts us at #5 in the odds to make playoffs
uzi
Member Posts: 1,298
Comments
-
15% > 11% or so I've heard... we're 4th. This is ordered by percent change
-
We want Okie State
-
That's #5 in terms of rising odds this week. Oklahoma is definitely above UW.
-
Lol good eye. Oklahoma isn't even listed.UWhuskytskeet said:That's #5 in terms of rising odds this week. Oklahoma is definitely above UW.
-
link
-
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
-
After we? Lose to Stanford and Oregon this shit can die.
-
F U C K !
Sorry guys, you are right, I read it wrong, here is the right one:
Has us 7, not 5. My bad.
They both can be seen at the Washington page on ESPN
http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/264/washington-huskies -
thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
-
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
-
-
It's September.
-
ESPN...key letters.
Hope they do -
-
Penn State at 37% after almost losing to Appalachian State hurts their credibility just a little.
-
Awfully warm out for December.
-
Irregardless, Penn State is a team that might actually be good.oregonblitzkrieg said:Penn State at 37% after almost losing to Appalachian State hurts their credibility just a little.
-
yeah, but Ohio St and Penn St are mutually exclusive so it's one or the other. Only league getting two teams into the playoffs is the SEC. ACC, Big Ten & 12 look like shit except for the top teams. Pac12 just looks like shit. Notre Dame is living week to week.JaWarrenJaHooker said:
Irregardless, Penn State is a team that might actually be good.oregonblitzkrieg said:Penn State at 37% after almost losing to Appalachian State hurts their credibility just a little.
-
Looking at the fighting potatoes schedule they actually have a shot to make the playoffs while being a totally over rated team. They could drop one to Stanford and still end up as a one loss team. All the "traditional powerhouse" teams they play this year look like garbage so they could end up getting credit for a TUFF schedule while being a total paper tiger. A worse Alabama beat down than the 2012 version could be incoming.
-
IF we end up being left out, 10/10 would take an overhyped Notre Dame in the Rose Bowel to get to hand their asses to them. It would definitely help our head to head recruiting with them if we got to beat the shit out of them on a national stage.
That said, we better fucking win the North and the PAC12 otherwise We Are BACK! to being mediocre and under performing. -
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
-
Pete's 5 year plan to be the highest ranked 1-loss teamuzi said:F U C K !
Sorry guys, you are right, I read it wrong, here is the right one:
Has us 7, not 5. My bad.
They both can be seen at the Washington page on ESPN
http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/264/washington-huskies -
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
-
Baphomet said:
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
You think he wanted the image url and not the actual link to the article?
FS
-
There wasn't an article.dtd said:Baphomet said:
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
You think he wanted the image url and not the actual link to the article?
FS
And OP already gave the URL to the Washington page on ESPN which has this image.
What more do you want? -
Baphomet said:
There wasn't an article.dtd said:Baphomet said:
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
You think he wanted the image url and not the actual link to the article?
FS
And OP already gave the URL to the Washington page on ESPN which has this image.
What more do you want?
Yeah, after a link was asked for. You seriously thought the dude was asking for the image. He was asking for the source, you dumb shit.
If you want to argue semantics I would explain to you that the feeds on those team sites are literally HTML articles(data-type="article"), but something tells me my time would be better spent making room in my freezer for the urine filled condoms I'll need on 10/13.
I want you to not be a fucking moron.
-
Christ, not in the middle of the store.
-
Fuck Notre Dame. An overrated paper tiger shit team if there ever was one. Teams that don't play conference championships should be disqualified from playoff contention.UW_Doog_Bot said:Looking at the fighting potatoes schedule they actually have a shot to make the playoffs while being a totally over rated team. They could drop one to Stanford and still end up as a one loss team. All the "traditional powerhouse" teams they play this year look like garbage so they could end up getting credit for a TUFF schedule while being a total paper tiger. A worse Alabama beat down than the 2012 version could be incoming.
-
Says the terribad quook troll on a fringe husky forum. Rich.dtd said:Baphomet said:
There wasn't an article.dtd said:Baphomet said:
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
You think he wanted the image url and not the actual link to the article?
FS
And OP already gave the URL to the Washington page on ESPN which has this image.
What more do you want?
Yeah, after a link was asked for. You seriously thought the dude was asking for the image. He was asking for the source, you dumb shit.
If you want to argue semantics I would explain to you that the feeds on those team sites are literally HTML articles(data-type="article"), but something tells me my time would be better spent making room in my freezer for the urine filled condoms I'll need on 10/13.
I want you to not be a fucking moron.
JFC, @DerekJohnson. Close the fucking gates. -
And I showed him how to determine it. Right click on the image, and presto, it shows you its from ESPN. Wow!dtd said:Baphomet said:
There wasn't an article.dtd said:Baphomet said:
So? If you click on it, it shows you the source. Which is what was asked for.dtd said:
It's a fucking image dude.Baphomet said:
You can see the link that way, which is what you asked for.SarkFanSixtyNine said:thank you for the update OP
whyBaphomet said:
Right click the image. . .SarkFanSixtyNine said:link
For fucks sake. Did IQs suddenly drop by 50 points around here?
Here is the direct link you get by right clicking on it.
https://primary-cdn-shortstop.espn.net/b162d6b8-13d1-4adc-b2ae-5bbcbe67b95e.png
You think he wanted the image url and not the actual link to the article?
FS
And OP already gave the URL to the Washington page on ESPN which has this image.
What more do you want?
He was asking for the source
I think you really need to upgrade whatever it is you put in your bong to something that doesn't kill so many of your brain cells.
