I'm sure Paul Manafort's guilty plea to conspiracy against the US is nothing.
Comments
-
Riled up quook = best quook
-
Shocking you are sucking Race's dick.SFGbob said:
For a brief moment I thought there might be some hope for you Hondo. You appear to be nothing more than a very dishonest troll Kunt. Shocking you dodged the question you were asked.2001400ex said:
Lol race race he was sloppy. After pressing several posts and even a copy pasta with no link. Continuing to double down on his BS claim.SFGbob said:
You make for a bad liar Hondo. How does this plea deal show that Manafort is "taking one for the team?" Which "team" is he taking one for? Race admitted that he erred in his statement. You should try it sometime Hondo.2001400ex said:
The purpose wasn't implicating Trump. But you do sound scared.SFGbob said:
The entire purpose of you posting that Trump tweet and saying that Manafort was "taking one for the team" was to implicate Trump and the Trump campaign into this recent plea deal. Are you this dishonest with all of your dealings Hondo?2001400ex said:
Show me where I said the charges were connected to Trump. I did say he was the head of the Trump campaign. Ballwasher.RaceBannon said:
What charges? The rest of the charges from his trial are part of this deal including hiding money fro years ago2001400ex said:
No shit. Tell that to @RaceBannonSFGbob said:He was already convicted of the tax evasion this plea is dealing with other charges.
So what is charged with that includes Trump or his time with trump?
Curious why you don't call out Race for his lies on the guilty pleas? -
So I'm defending Trump in regards to a plea deal that doesn't involve Trump by clearly stating that fact. Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do.2001400ex said:
Cause you are washing Trump's balls defending him. Which is funny cause if there's nothing to defend him for, why do you two keep defending him?SFGbob said:And if you weren't trying to implicate Trump in this why would you make this statement Hondo?
Why would I wash Trump's balls over a plea deal that doesn't involve Trump unless you were trying to implicate Trump in this?2001400ex said:Also can't wait for such fag Bob and Race washing Trump's balls.
-
The fbi hacks you support testified they wouldn't have got the warrants to spy on an opponent without the fake dossier that Hillary colluded with Russia to getinsinceredawg said:
The investigation didn't start out of thin air, nor did it start from the "fake dossier" as Trump often claims.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I really can't find words scathing enough to describe the extreme disdain I feel for idiots who know all of this to be true, but go along with it because it's their side doing it. They don't deserve to live in a free country.Sledog said:
As I have said let me look into everything someone has done with no limits on time or scope and I could probably charge every person on this board with a crime. Every single one. This is not how our justice system works. We do not investigate people to find a crime. A crime is discovered and then we look for suspects not the other way around. This is KGB, NAZI level shit.2001400ex said:
Here's the thing. You are correct this is not a direct link to Trump. What is behind all this, that's the question. I don't know. Could be nothing. We'll find out over time.RaceBannon said:Regardless, Manafort did not play a “limited role” in the campaign. He was involved with the campaign for five months, serving as campaign chairman for three of those months until he resigned. Moreover, his roles in the campaign, particularly Convention Manager, were crucial, and arguably prevented a derailing of Trump’s nomination through a floor fight at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.
Ooooooh
During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton.
About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.
Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role.
The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html
Keep washing her balls as the kids like to say -
How am I sucking Race's dick by asking you which "team" Manafort was taking one for?2001400ex said:
Shocking you are sucking Race's dick.SFGbob said:
For a brief moment I thought there might be some hope for you Hondo. You appear to be nothing more than a very dishonest troll Kunt. Shocking you dodged the question you were asked.2001400ex said:
Lol race race he was sloppy. After pressing several posts and even a copy pasta with no link. Continuing to double down on his BS claim.SFGbob said:
You make for a bad liar Hondo. How does this plea deal show that Manafort is "taking one for the team?" Which "team" is he taking one for? Race admitted that he erred in his statement. You should try it sometime Hondo.2001400ex said:
The purpose wasn't implicating Trump. But you do sound scared.SFGbob said:
The entire purpose of you posting that Trump tweet and saying that Manafort was "taking one for the team" was to implicate Trump and the Trump campaign into this recent plea deal. Are you this dishonest with all of your dealings Hondo?2001400ex said:
Show me where I said the charges were connected to Trump. I did say he was the head of the Trump campaign. Ballwasher.RaceBannon said:
What charges? The rest of the charges from his trial are part of this deal including hiding money fro years ago2001400ex said:
No shit. Tell that to @RaceBannonSFGbob said:He was already convicted of the tax evasion this plea is dealing with other charges.
So what is charged with that includes Trump or his time with trump?
Curious why you don't call out Race for his lies on the guilty pleas?
Ohhhh look, using Hondo's Kunt logic he is washing Trump's balls.
Here's the thing. You are correct this is not a direct link to Trump. -
The left is still promising it. I don't currently believe it but I'm willing to see the evidence to support the claim if it exists. Where is it?CirrhosisDawg said:
Who promised that? You believed it? Jfc.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm just waiting on the smoking gun for collusion with the Russians. It's what I was promised "sometime very soon" for over two years now. Is that happening or nah?
-
Ask your buddy OBK, he's the one that made the statement.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
Also, the guy Papadopoulos says he originally heard the information about Moscow having Hillary's emails is missing and may be dead. The guy Joesph Mifsud has been reported to have ties with British Intelligence. Btw, the Aussie never said Papadopoulos told him that Russians had Hillary's emails, he said that he was told that Russia had dirt on Hillary.RaceBannon said:
The fbi hacks you support testified they wouldn't have got the warrants to spy on an opponent without the fake dossier that Hillary colluded with Russia to getinsinceredawg said:
The investigation didn't start out of thin air, nor did it start from the "fake dossier" as Trump often claims.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I really can't find words scathing enough to describe the extreme disdain I feel for idiots who know all of this to be true, but go along with it because it's their side doing it. They don't deserve to live in a free country.Sledog said:
As I have said let me look into everything someone has done with no limits on time or scope and I could probably charge every person on this board with a crime. Every single one. This is not how our justice system works. We do not investigate people to find a crime. A crime is discovered and then we look for suspects not the other way around. This is KGB, NAZI level shit.2001400ex said:
Here's the thing. You are correct this is not a direct link to Trump. What is behind all this, that's the question. I don't know. Could be nothing. We'll find out over time.RaceBannon said:Regardless, Manafort did not play a “limited role” in the campaign. He was involved with the campaign for five months, serving as campaign chairman for three of those months until he resigned. Moreover, his roles in the campaign, particularly Convention Manager, were crucial, and arguably prevented a derailing of Trump’s nomination through a floor fight at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.
Ooooooh
During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton.
About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.
Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role.
The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html
Keep washing her balls as the kids like to say -
I expect you'll go after OBK on that claim like you go after the rats.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
I’m sure you’ll be the first one mueller calls when he’s done. I’ve heard him say sanctimonious bitches with a BS in economics will be the first to know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The left is still promising it. I don't currently believe it but I'm willing to see the evidence to support the claim if it exists. Where is it?CirrhosisDawg said:
Who promised that? You believed it? Jfc.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm just waiting on the smoking gun for collusion with the Russians. It's what I was promised "sometime very soon" for over two years now. Is that happening or nah?
-
You're correct. I thought you had changed his words not just highlighted them.insinceredawg said:
Ask your buddy OBK, he's the one that made the statement.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
OBK, your numbers are crap. -
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
I have no interest in re-litigating the Iraq war but we didn't "murder" millions.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
I don't agree with the millions number. But I do agree than hundreds of thousands more people died from the actions of the US than Saddam was convicted of killing.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
No, 'we the people did not' nor did the soldiers who carry out orders based on the false evidence presented by our leaders. Our leaders murdered hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. HTFH. Try to hide from it if you want to, that's the truth whether you like it or not.SFGbob said:
I have no interest in re-litigating the Iraq war but we didn't "murder" millions.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
loloregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Look out guys. obk has a dictionary. -
Ur all fuckeddflea said:
loloregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Look out guys. obk has a dictionary. -
Whether the number is millions or hundreds of thousands. They were murdered. No need for quotes on that.SFGbob said:
I have no interest in re-litigating the Iraq war but we didn't "murder" millions.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
Millions was an exaggeration, but the body count is higher than 500K2001400ex said:
Whether the number is millions or hundreds of thousands. They were murdered. No need for quotes on that.SFGbob said:
I have no interest in re-litigating the Iraq war but we didn't "murder" millions.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I made that statement and I own it. The people in government who made the decision to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, are the murderers. They have blood on their hands. Not the soldiers who were forced to carry out the orders. The fact that many of them still hold high office is a disgusting perversion of justice.SFGbob said:
We murdered millions in Iraq? Got a link? Or does this kind of outrageous blood libel just get excused as "trolling" around here?insinceredawg said:
Isn't that a win for you? You openly call for genocide of all Muslims on a regular basis.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down. -
"A coup d'état (/ˌkuː deɪˈtɑː/ (About this sound listen); French: [ku deta]), also known simply as a coup, a putsch (/pʊtʃ/), golpe de estado, or an overthrow, is an illegal and overt seizure of a state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus.[1] "oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Say it again with feeling: The only people who can remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate. (alleged) illegal or improper conduct by FBI officials has no bearing here; you can't indict a sitting President after all. But the Congress can remove him for whatever reason they want and it's perfectly constitutional. That's why the founders put the clause in the document in the first place. -
Ok! I'll still be waiting! LMK!CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure you’ll be the first one mueller calls when he’s done. I’ve heard him say sanctimonious bitches with a BS in economics will be the first to know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The left is still promising it. I don't currently believe it but I'm willing to see the evidence to support the claim if it exists. Where is it?CirrhosisDawg said:
Who promised that? You believed it? Jfc.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm just waiting on the smoking gun for collusion with the Russians. It's what I was promised "sometime very soon" for over two years now. Is that happening or nah?
-
What an effete intellectual snob he isdflea said:
loloregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Look out guys. obk has a dictionary. -
Fuck that made me laugh. Not a dig a you OBK that just hit me as funny.dflea said:
loloregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Look out guys. obk has a dictionary. -
Next thing you know he'll be putting on airs using all kinds of fancy punctuation. Gawd damn nancy-boy.RaceBannon said:
What an effete intellectual snob he isdflea said:
loloregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Look out guys. obk has a dictionary. -
"An illegal attempt to seize control of the state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus."YellowSnow said:
"A coup d'état (/ˌkuː deɪˈtɑː/ (About this sound listen); French: [ku deta]), also known simply as a coup, a putsch (/pʊtʃ/), golpe de estado, or an overthrow, is an illegal and overt seizure of a state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus.[1] "oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Say it again with feeling: The only people who can remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate. (alleged) illegal or improper conduct by FBI officials has no bearing here; you can't indict a sitting President after all. But the Congress can remove him for whatever reason they want and it's perfectly constitutional. That's why the founders put the clause in the document in the first place.
Well done, you just described exactly what is currently happening. An attempted coup by bad actors in the intelligence agencies (Strzok, Ohr, Comey, etc. and their democrat and republican backers in government) in which they ILLEGALLY obtained FISA warrants to spy on an opposition campaign based on a fraudulent Russian dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton. Then after Trump was elected, a coordinated leaking campaign (insurance policy) and an attempt to frame him for Russian collusion ensued. That is the definition of a fucking coup. HTH.
"The only people who can LAWFULLY remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate."
Corrected for accuracy. We are not talking about people who are following the law here, or the spirit of the Constitution, so all of that is thrown out the window. We're talking about unelected officials in the intelligence agencies perverting truth and justice in an attempt to take down a sitting President. That's a fucking coup. And it would still be a coup even if Congress removed him, if it was done based on fraudulent evidence concocted by politically motivated deep state rats in the intelligence agencies.
-
You can quibble about the use of coup but this post is right onoregonblitzkrieg said:
"An illegal attempt to seize control of the state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus."YellowSnow said:
"A coup d'état (/ˌkuː deɪˈtɑː/ (About this sound listen); French: [ku deta]), also known simply as a coup, a putsch (/pʊtʃ/), golpe de estado, or an overthrow, is an illegal and overt seizure of a state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus.[1] "oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Say it again with feeling: The only people who can remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate. (alleged) illegal or improper conduct by FBI officials has no bearing here; you can't indict a sitting President after all. But the Congress can remove him for whatever reason they want and it's perfectly constitutional. That's why the founders put the clause in the document in the first place.
Well done, you just described exactly what is currently happening. An attempted coup by bad actors in the intelligence agencies (Strzok, Ohr, Comey, etc. and their democrat and republican backers in government) in which they ILLEGALLY obtained FISA warrants to spy on an opposition campaign based on a fraudulent Russian dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton. Then after Trump was elected, a coordinated leaking campaign (insurance policy) and an attempt to frame him for Russian collusion ensued. That is the definition of a fucking coup. HTH.
"The only people who can LAWFULLY remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate."
Corrected for accuracy. We are not talking about people who are following the law here, or the spirit of the Constitution, so all of that is thrown out the window. We're talking about unelected officials in the intelligence agencies perverting truth and justice in an attempt to take down a sitting President. That's a fucking coup. And it would still be a coup even if Congress removed him, if it was done based on fraudulent evidence concocted by politically motivated deep state rats in the intelligence agencies. -
Congress has access to the same information as you do, OBK. And it's up to them to decide whether or not a high crimes and misdemeanors occurred. Either Trump and his staff committed crimes or they did not. I'm still waiting for the final reporting to pass judgment. Keep in mind impeachment and trial in the Senate isn't the same thing as a criminal trial. All evidence is admissible.oregonblitzkrieg said:
"An illegal attempt to seize control of the state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus."YellowSnow said:
"A coup d'état (/ˌkuː deɪˈtɑː/ (About this sound listen); French: [ku deta]), also known simply as a coup, a putsch (/pʊtʃ/), golpe de estado, or an overthrow, is an illegal and overt seizure of a state by the military or other elites within the state apparatus.[1] "oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really, is that so? Please to be looking up the word 'coup' in the dictionary. These people are already operating outside the bounds of the constitution. It's not impossible that this happens in the United States.YellowSnow said:
The President cannot be removed via unconstitutional means. If the House passes articles of impeachment and 2/3 of the Senate votes to convict, then removal from office is legal as per the Constitution. Impeachment is not a coup.oregonblitzkrieg said:The establishment crooks, the fascist warmongers who brought us the Iraq war, in which they murdered millions and excused it based on false evidence, the leftist cucks who are anti-free speech, pro-gun confiscation, pro open borders and pro socialism, are on the ropes and these are their last desperate gasps to cling onto power. The disease on the republic that these
peoplefilthy, repugnant insects represent, transcends party lines. They are democrats and they are republicans. The establishment from the past 20 to 30 years. If they somehow manage to take down Trump by unconstitutional means, I would move to go Bastille on the United States government and take it down.
Say it again with feeling: The only people who can remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate. (alleged) illegal or improper conduct by FBI officials has no bearing here; you can't indict a sitting President after all. But the Congress can remove him for whatever reason they want and it's perfectly constitutional. That's why the founders put the clause in the document in the first place.
Well done, you just described exactly what is currently happening. An attempted coup by bad actors in the intelligence agencies (Strzok, Ohr, Comey, etc. and their democrat and republican backers in government) in which they ILLEGALLY obtained FISA warrants to spy on an opposition campaign based on a fraudulent Russian dossier that was paid for by Hillary Clinton. Then after Trump was elected, a coordinated leaking campaign (insurance policy) and an attempt to frame him for Russian collusion ensued. That is the definition of a fucking coup. HTH.
"The only people who can LAWFULLY remove the President are the lawfully elected members of the House and Senate."
Corrected for accuracy. We are not talking about people who are following the law here, or the spirit of the Constitution, so all of that is thrown out the window. We're talking about unelected officials in the intelligence agencies perverting truth and justice in an attempt to take down a sitting President. That's a fucking coup. And it would still be a coup even if Congress removed him, if it was done based on fraudulent evidence concocted by politically motivated deep state rats in the intelligence agencies. -
I don’t keep up here, but wait - some people here are QTards?!?
lololololol
Enjoy the great awakening Dawg bros! Hope it happens for you.