I'm secure enough in my (homo)sexuality to...
IDGAF they call it a Ladysmith....I like it.
Comments
-
It's good for people with small hands
-
So you're saying your hands make him look larger?Swaye said: -
-
I take it you bought the appropriate matching holster?
-
.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
-
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
-
Yeah because wimps can't handle recoil. 357 is a fantastic round. Almost all rounds are fantastic if used properly by someone who actually trains. I routinely carry the following rounds...Sledog said:
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
9MM
.357 Mag (now)
10MM (BOOM)
.38 SUPER (awesome round)
.44 Special
In the past I have also carried:
.380
.45 ACP
If I could find a carry appropriate gun I would carry:
5.7X28MM
All of them work. -
Hurtful. Also, I think your response might have invalidated the protective order, so game on! Pancakes? I can make them in the shape of my sweet sweet girl gun.Doog_de_Jour said:I take it you bought the appropriate matching holster?
-
That’s for the judge to decide.Swaye said:
Hurtful. Also, I think your response might have invalidated the protective order, so game on! Pancakes? I can make them in the shape of my sweet sweet girl gun.Doog_de_Jour said:I take it you bought the appropriate matching holster?
Though pancakes are tasty...
In all seriousness, that’s a beautiful gun. Glad you treated yourself!
-
You should get one. Then we can get matching purses. YES!Doog_de_Jour said:
That’s for the judge to decide.Swaye said:
Hurtful. Also, I think your response might have invalidated the protective order, so game on! Pancakes? I can make them in the shape of my sweet sweet girl gun.Doog_de_Jour said:I take it you bought the appropriate matching holster?
Though pancakes are tasty...
In all seriousness, that’s a beautiful gun. Glad you treated yourself! -
Yes. Same for law enforcement, although this change occurred much later in the 20th century. ATBSJBS, I'm not a cop, don't serve in the military, and don't have plans to get into any drug gang related shootouts requiring multiple double stack magazines. People forget that most self defense situations involving normal law abiding citizens are resolved in 1 or 2 shots at most.Sledog said:
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
This would strictly be for shooting watermelons, beer cans and 2 litres in the back woods of WA. Also for camping trips and what not. Revolvers are simple to maintain and are fun to target shoot with. The ability to use .38 speshial too in it appealing as well. -
Here's Swaye's next gun
-
If we’re going to bash Derringer pistols that are small enough to fit into a garter holster then I’m out!YellowSnow said:Here's Swaye's next gun
-
NMTEBDoog_de_Jour said:
If we’re going to bash Derringer pistols that are small enough to fit into a garter holster then I’m out!YellowSnow said:Here's Swaye's next gun
Pics? -
No. They quite using them because they were too unreliable in battlefield conditions. I don't care what anyone carries that's a personal choice. But the bigger the hole means more blood out and more air in! I've never used the 9mm for serious business. I've seen it work and I've seen it fail. Modern ammo helps but it's always punching the smaller hole. Where one hits is more important than what one hits with. More effective calibers just give you a slightly larger margin of error. Some people refuse to stop their actions or die easily.Swaye said:
Yeah because wimps can't handle recoil. 357 is a fantastic round. Almost all rounds are fantastic if used properly by someone who actually trains. I routinely carry the following rounds...Sledog said:
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
9MM
.357 Mag (now)
10MM (BOOM)
.38 SUPER (awesome round)
.44 Special
In the past I have also carried:
.380
.45 ACP
If I could find a carry appropriate gun I would carry:
5.7X28MM
All of them work. -
Are you referring to the military's decision to go away from revolvers or .357? .357 wasn't even developed until well after the US Army adopted .45ACP. I think @swaye was referencing .357 recoil here.Sledog said:
No. They quite using them because they were too unreliable in battlefield conditions. I don't care what anyone carries that's a personal choice. But the bigger the hole means more blood out and more air in! I've never used the 9mm for serious business. I've seen it work and I've seen it fail. Modern ammo helps but it's always punching the smaller hole. Where one hits is more important than what one hits with. More effective calibers just give you a slightly larger margin of error. Some people refuse to stop their actions or die easily.Swaye said:
Yeah because wimps can't handle recoil. 357 is a fantastic round. Almost all rounds are fantastic if used properly by someone who actually trains. I routinely carry the following rounds...Sledog said:
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
9MM
.357 Mag (now)
10MM (BOOM)
.38 SUPER (awesome round)
.44 Special
In the past I have also carried:
.380
.45 ACP
If I could find a carry appropriate gun I would carry:
5.7X28MM
All of them work. -
That the military went away from revolvers and then I addressed calibers a bit. Everyone should bet their life on what they believe. Education and real world experience do help though.YellowSnow said:
Are you referring to the military's decision to go away from revolvers or .357? .357 wasn't even developed until well after the US Army adopted .45ACP. I think @swaye was referencing .357 recoil here.Sledog said:
No. They quite using them because they were too unreliable in battlefield conditions. I don't care what anyone carries that's a personal choice. But the bigger the hole means more blood out and more air in! I've never used the 9mm for serious business. I've seen it work and I've seen it fail. Modern ammo helps but it's always punching the smaller hole. Where one hits is more important than what one hits with. More effective calibers just give you a slightly larger margin of error. Some people refuse to stop their actions or die easily.Swaye said:
Yeah because wimps can't handle recoil. 357 is a fantastic round. Almost all rounds are fantastic if used properly by someone who actually trains. I routinely carry the following rounds...Sledog said:
There is a reason the military stopped using them.YellowSnow said:.357 ?? I'm on the verge of getting a Smith & Wesson 686 4". I love revolvers.
9MM
.357 Mag (now)
10MM (BOOM)
.38 SUPER (awesome round)
.44 Special
In the past I have also carried:
.380
.45 ACP
If I could find a carry appropriate gun I would carry:
5.7X28MM
All of them work. -
I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space.
-
38/200 is the .38 S&W loaded with a 200 grain bullet. They never should have dropped the .455 but back then handguns saw less use than they do in the modern military.BearsWiin said:I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space. -
The internets tells me that the reasoning behind the 38/200 was that a longer heavy low-speed bullet would be unstable and keyhole when it hit a target, making its stopping power almost as great as the .455. The internets also seems to think that this reasoning is faulty.Sledog said:
38/200 is the .38 S&W loaded with a 200 grain bullet. They never should have dropped the .455 but back then handguns saw less use than they do in the modern military.BearsWiin said:I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space.
DA-only hammer configuration along with a god-awful heavy trigger pull means this gun isn't going to win anybody any marksmanship contests -
I love the look of the top-break Brit revolvers.BearsWiin said:
The internets tells me that the reasoning behind the 38/200 was that a longer heavy low-speed bullet would be unstable and keyhole when it hit a target, making its stopping power almost as great as the .455. The internets also seems to think that this reasoning is faulty.Sledog said:
38/200 is the .38 S&W loaded with a 200 grain bullet. They never should have dropped the .455 but back then handguns saw less use than they do in the modern military.BearsWiin said:I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space.
DA-only hammer configuration along with a god-awful heavy trigger pull means this gun isn't going to win anybody any marksmanship contests -
So do I. But I tend to think that there's some inherent limitation to how powerful the cartridge can be since the frame isn't all one piece; there are serious weak poonts at the hinge and latch. That said,GrundleStiltzkin said:
I love the look of the top-break Brit revolvers.BearsWiin said:
The internets tells me that the reasoning behind the 38/200 was that a longer heavy low-speed bullet would be unstable and keyhole when it hit a target, making its stopping power almost as great as the .455. The internets also seems to think that this reasoning is faulty.Sledog said:
38/200 is the .38 S&W loaded with a 200 grain bullet. They never should have dropped the .455 but back then handguns saw less use than they do in the modern military.BearsWiin said:I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space.
DA-only hammer configuration along with a god-awful heavy trigger pull means this gun isn't going to win anybody any marksmanship contestsJake Browning still sucksit's definitely worth it to have the gun and bullwhip, wear the hat and leather jacket, and let the wife pretend that I'm Harrison Ford
Indy coitus -
I always thought when the whip comes down was a Rolling Stones song about gay sex.BearsWiin said:
So do I. But I tend to think that there's some inherent limitation to how powerful the cartridge can be since the frame isn't all one piece; there are serious weak poonts at the hinge and latch. That said,GrundleStiltzkin said:
I love the look of the top-break Brit revolvers.BearsWiin said:
The internets tells me that the reasoning behind the 38/200 was that a longer heavy low-speed bullet would be unstable and keyhole when it hit a target, making its stopping power almost as great as the .455. The internets also seems to think that this reasoning is faulty.Sledog said:
38/200 is the .38 S&W loaded with a 200 grain bullet. They never should have dropped the .455 but back then handguns saw less use than they do in the modern military.BearsWiin said:I've got an Enfield Mk II No. 1 Tanker's pistol chambered for the 38/200 which is unavailable in this cuntry, so I have to use .38 S&W in it instead. Smaller version of the Webley .455 breaktop. Muzzle velocity is about 600 fps, and on longer shots at the range I swear you can see the damn thing arcing. POW!...putt POW!...putt
They wanted something with low muzzle velocity so that if you missed your target (somebody invading your tank) you wouldn't have to deal with wicked ricochets in a closed space.
DA-only hammer configuration along with a god-awful heavy trigger pull means this gun isn't going to win anybody any marksmanship contestsJake Browning still sucksit's definitely worth it to have the gun and bullwhip, wear the hat and leather jacket, and let the wife pretend that I'm Harrison Ford
Indy coitus
