Hardcore Husky Board
Hardcore Husky Board
Peterson's shrinking balls a growing concern?
Comments
-
-
So what you are saying is that Slingblade>>>>Chip?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Helfrich won a playoff game in his second year.
Slingblade >>>>>> Pete
Doogs hate facts. -
Quook logic would suggest that a playoff victory is equal to a BCS title game appearance in the era where playoff games didn't yet exist, but title games did. So technically speaking, they're equals, that's more or less true, even though we know it isn't.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So what you are saying is that Slingblade>>>>Chip?
Just like UW's half natty is equivalent to a title game appearance (because the actual game was never played on the field) or a playoff victory. -
I wasnt aware of how these things worked. Im glad youre here to enlighten meoregonblitzkrieg said:
Quook logic would suggest that a playoff victory is equal to a BCS title game appearance in the era where playoff games didn't yet exist, but title games did. So technically speaking, they're equals, that's more or less true, even though we know it isn't.
Just like UW's half natty is equivalent to a title game appearance (because the actual game was never played on the field) or a playoff victory. -
Mosster47 said:
Cute, but you know that isn't true. If you lose in Eugene this year you've already lost the war again.
-
Great character break as always, @MikeSeaverJack_Cobra said:Oregon actually won a playoff game. Checkmate doogs.
-
Times like this I wish there was a "desperate" button to click.Mosster47 said:
He didn't want the Oregon job because there would be expectations.
That's an interesting poont. -
I'm not happy with the play calling, yet. But I think it's noticeably better than Smiffy's. The problems are magnified when guys aren't making blocks, executing plays, and being quick - which is not in Browning's bag, at all. Put a quick thinker in there, and there's no fumble in the Auburn Red Zone. And that's just one example.topdawgnc said:I'm surprised you fucktards are surprised the play calling still sucks.
I'm even more surprised anyone would even think Peterman is considering swapping out Jake for Jake.
Browning is here until he graduates or gets broken. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really? One of them won a playoff game and a trip to the title game. The next guy brought in a killer staff and changed the recruiting trajectory. Then he left after 1 year, fortunately. Now we've got a Saban understudy who is throttling the rest of the PAC on the recruiting trail, while showing a trend of slashing penalties so far, which has been Oregon's Achilles Heel during the tenure of the last two coaches. He's still LIPO, but he's showing early signs of having strong command of the program.
Your premise is a steaming pile of shit.
You just doubled down on propping up Slingblade to support your point. Might be time to take a walk on the beach with your inflatable wife and gain some perspective.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Helfrich won a playoff game in his second year.
Slingblade >>>>>> Pete
Doogs hate facts.
Or kill yourself. -
How the hell can you possibly think the placalling is noticeably better?!? The only times our offense has looked competent this year was the hurry up at the end of the first half against Auburn and when Haener was in there. The rest has been indistinguishable from BabushkaFS.TurdBuffer said:
I'm not happy with the play calling, yet. But I think it's noticeably better than Smiffy's. The problems are magnified when guys aren't making blocks, executing plays, and being quick - which is not in Browning's bag, at all. Put a quick thinker in there, and there's no fumble in the Auburn Red Zone. And that's just one example. -
Jake's arm isn't strong enough for screen passes.HuskyJW said:
Have we ever run a simple screen pass to a runningback to slow down a pass rush? It's always some swinging gate or some shit. -
UW isn't passing on first down every series, for starters. If that's not an obvious improvement from Smiff, I don't know what is.EsophagealFeces said:
How the hell can you possibly think the placalling is noticeably better?!? The only times our offense has looked competent this year was the hurry up at the end of the first half against Auburn and when Haener was in there. The rest has been indistinguishable from BabushkaFS. -
EsophagealFeces said:
You just doubled down on propping up Slingblade to support your point. Might be time to take a walk on the beach with your inflatable wife and gain some perspective.
Or kill yourself.
-
Stadium will be empty by half time. Monte Cristo-Ballz Deep won't have any idea what hit him. Ghost of Helfrich returns. Herbies throws a pix six to BBK to end the game, final score 48-10.
-
Goddamn this poast made my day, DerekDerekJohnson said:In the back of our minds, we've all been waiting for UW to have that crowning moment where they hook n ladder and statue of liberty their way to a huge win over a powerhouse opponent. I dont necessarily mean trick plays, but via big balls and gravitas.
That moment has yet to come. Into year five there have been no epic victories over a premier opponent. For four years now, the Huskies have been led by a noodle-armed sniveling QB to whose star Chris Fetters has now hitched his wagon.
The limp-wristed offensive game plan through two weeks is eroding hope that our new OC will be better than the idiot we suffered through the previous four years. Which goes to show, its Petersons offense. Just like how when Willingham changed defensive coordinators it made zero difference. That was Willingham's defense.
So if indeed Peterson left his balls in Boise, the question is why? What happened? Perhaps in Boise he felt like the constant underdog who had to take chances. But at UW, the resources are better and the stakes and expectations are higher, so he plays not to lose.
He's shown that he's aware of an issue on offense that is beyond his means to fix--- he wouldn't have brought in Tedford otherwise.
But even if he recognizes that benching the crybaby and bringing in Haener gives UW a higher ceiling, he won't do it. Pete's either too stubborn or too near sighted.
Don James was criticized several times for sticking with his QBs too long. But I guarantee that he would have zero patience with Browning's boneheaded turnovers and sideline pouting.
This season has 8-4 written all over it. Commentators like Yogi Roth will fawn over Jake into mid December, citing his assault on the UW record books.
But as much as they want to talk about Browning's legacy, there really is none to any discerning fan who has been paying attention.
Fuck.
GRAA
BWNEM -
I'm kind of embarrassed I have to spell it out for you guys. Jake is Peterman's illegitimate child.
-
His false equivalent scare is impressive and thorough.Pitchfork51 said:
I wasnt aware of how these things worked. Im glad youre here to enlighten me -
If we? are down 21-0 at half does Peterman nut up and bench Brownsocks? That’s the big question, and will determine the future of our? program and Peterman’s legacy.
-
I would be shocked.Thebourbinator said:If we? are down 21-0 at half does Peterman nut up and bench Brownsocks? That’s the big question, and will determine the future of our? program and Peterman’s legacy.
-
Brownings limp wristed.
