Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Remember when libs used to insist that Obama wasn't a socialist...

1568101116

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Thanks to Obama's Healthcare plan, millions more people are now covered by Health Insurance that is paid for by other working-class people whose rates went up and now both groups receive a far more complicated, onerous, bureaucratic and inferior product. Yay.

    I don't know. My insurance went from 8% increases every year to 3% or so. I won. 30 million people have health Care that didn't before.

    While the law was shit and there's lots to do to fix it. It's better than the old system.
    If you fail to appreciate what a Time-Bomb Obamacare is, I can't help you. I got the teaser rate my first two years, too. Then came the 12% increase and higher deductibles.

    Funny thing one must realize: Money doesn't grow on trees, except in Socialist utopias, like Venezuela, which I hear is nice.
    Liar. 7 years later.... The only people getting ridiculous increases to insurance are those that are buying of the exchange and live in small counties. Cause fucksticks on both sides of the aisle won't get rid of the county lines and let insurers market across the entire state.
    Everyone has been getting ridiculous increases to insurance forever

    Huh, funny how those increases correlate almost perfectly with the passages of medicaid, medicare, and the government getting involved in the market... It's almost as if basic concepts of crowding out and government inefficiency vs. the free market really do exist.





    Our government isn't capable of efficiently "planning" a market or an industry.
    You can also find a very similar level of increase in the cost of higher education and it to corresponds very neatly with the Federal Government's efforts to make college more affordable.
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
    I'd say the stupid person is the one claiming the only difference between health care and health insurance is one of semantics. Who's angry? I love making liberals look stupid.
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
    I'd say the stupid person is the one claiming the only difference between health care and health insurance is one of semantics. Who's angry? I love making liberals look stupid.
    You’ve only been here a short time but it appears that your shtick is doing bad-faith readings of liberal arguments so you can call them liars and “Kunts”. But truly, the libs are the ones who look stupid.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
    I'd say the stupid person is the one claiming the only difference between health care and health insurance is one of semantics. Who's angry? I love making liberals look stupid.
    You’ve only been here a short time but it appears that your shtick is doing bad-faith readings of liberal arguments so you can call them liars and “Kunts”. But truly, the libs are the ones who look stupid.
    And by "bad-faith" readings you mean quoting them word for word.
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
    I'd say the stupid person is the one claiming the only difference between health care and health insurance is one of semantics. Who's angry? I love making liberals look stupid.
    You’ve only been here a short time but it appears that your shtick is doing bad-faith readings of liberal arguments so you can call them liars and “Kunts”. But truly, the libs are the ones who look stupid.
    And by "bad-faith" readings you mean quoting them word for word.
    Be sure to let us know when you start doing this
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited September 2018
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Hospitals and Emergency rooms can not deny care based on inability to pay

    hondoFS as usual

    That is true in most states. But you miss the point too race.

    Here I'll give another example. So you change the oil in your car? Or do you let it ride until everything breaks? Most people without insurance do the latter.

    But basic concepts are lost on you and such fag Bob.
    Which state isn't that statement true in liar? I didn't have health insurance liar, but that didn't mean I just ignored my "oil change" needs. Shitty and stupid analogy dumbass. Let me guess, I missed your "point."
    While a federal law mandates patients in hospitals accepting Medicare funds be treated and stabilized. The level of care in each state varies.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/445756001
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    As inane as any Hondo post is, it is some kind of talent to make a person spend his day getting angry online about the semantic difference between health care and health insurance.

    Because the only difference between the two is "semantics." Who knew that very few people in the United States had any healthcare prior to the 1940s because most people had no health insurance then.
    You are right, that is what I said. Semantics are the only difference between the two. You are a very smart person.

    I did not say that you are getting mad arguing about the semantic difference between the two. How could someone read my post that way? They would have to be really stupid, incapable of processing the words in front of them. The kind of person who gets irrationally angry about such things.
    I'd say the stupid person is the one claiming the only difference between health care and health insurance is one of semantics. Who's angry? I love making liberals look stupid.
    You’ve only been here a short time but it appears that your shtick is doing bad-faith readings of liberal arguments so you can call them liars and “Kunts”. But truly, the libs are the ones who look stupid.
    And by "bad-faith" readings you mean quoting them word for word.
    Be sure to let us know when you start doing this
    Well you can start with this thread. I've not misquoted or misrepresented anything that was said by anyone here. Is Hondo paying you for this ass tonguing our are you offering this one up gratis? He said that 30 million people lacked healthcare prior to the passage of Obama care. I didn't make that up, he said it. It's a fucking lie. Plenty of people didn't have health insurance entirely by there own choice. That doesn't mean the lacked healthcare.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Hospitals and Emergency rooms can not deny care based on inability to pay

    hondoFS as usual

    That is true in most states. But you miss the point too race.

    Here I'll give another example. So you change the oil in your car? Or do you let it ride until everything breaks? Most people without insurance do the latter.

    But basic concepts are lost on you and such fag Bob.
    Which state isn't that statement true in liar? I didn't have health insurance liar, but that didn't mean I just ignored my "oil change" needs. Shitty and stupid analogy dumbass. Let me guess, I missed your "point."
    While a federal law mandates patients in hospitals accepting Medicare funds be treated and stabilized. The level of care in each state varies.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/445756001
    And as usual, the goal posts just moved. Hospitals and E-rooms can't deny care to anyone in all states not just most. I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck with this one Hondo.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Hospitals and Emergency rooms can not deny care based on inability to pay

    hondoFS as usual

    That is true in most states. But you miss the point too race.

    Here I'll give another example. So you change the oil in your car? Or do you let it ride until everything breaks? Most people without insurance do the latter.

    But basic concepts are lost on you and such fag Bob.
    Which state isn't that statement true in liar? I didn't have health insurance liar, but that didn't mean I just ignored my "oil change" needs. Shitty and stupid analogy dumbass. Let me guess, I missed your "point."
    Are you most people? Why do you think your actions are encompassing of the rest of the country?

    Here's a pro tip for you. I misspoke on health Care versus health insurance. Any rational person would have realized that. When you started arguing trying to prove you are right, I have been trolling you ever since. Which is what hardly clothed is referring to. And you still don't see.