The School Shootings That Weren't
Comments
-
The US Education Department in 2015-2016. Gosh, now who was the Executive in charge of that Department during that time frame? Odd that an agency under his control would produce such fraudulent numbers in order to advance their agenda.
-
Pressing. The article doesn't explicitly say when the survey was conducted, but the period for which it was requesting data was school year 2015-16. This paragraph seem to indicate the survey collection began June 2017.SFGbob said:The US Education Department in 2015-2016. Gosh, now who was the Executive in charge of that Department during that time frame? Odd that an agency under his control would produce such fraudulent numbers in order to advance their agenda.
"The CRDC accepts correction requests for up to one year from the moment the submission period opens. For the 2015-16 collection, the corrections period closed on June 30, 2018, and for this reason your data correction request cannot be accepted. However, a data note will be included on the data file to ensure users are aware of the errors you are reporting."
Again, the faulty numbers are due less to agenda and more to general government incompetence. Those with agendas will use the shitty numbers. -
Curious how the "shitty numbers" almost always favor the Rat party's policy positions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Pressing. The article doesn't explicitly say when the survey was conducted, but the period for which it was requesting data was school year 2015-16. This paragraph seem to indicate the survey collection began June 2017.SFGbob said:The US Education Department in 2015-2016. Gosh, now who was the Executive in charge of that Department during that time frame? Odd that an agency under his control would produce such fraudulent numbers in order to advance their agenda.
"The CRDC accepts correction requests for up to one year from the moment the submission period opens. For the 2015-16 collection, the corrections period closed on June 30, 2018, and for this reason your data correction request cannot be accepted. However, a data note will be included on the data file to ensure users are aware of the errors you are reporting."
Again, the faulty numbers are due less to agenda and more to general government incompetence. Those with agendas will use the shitty numbers. -
In this case, you have the Trump administration to blame.SFGbob said:
Curious how the "shitty numbers" almost always favor the Rat party's policy positions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Pressing. The article doesn't explicitly say when the survey was conducted, but the period for which it was requesting data was school year 2015-16. This paragraph seem to indicate the survey collection began June 2017.SFGbob said:The US Education Department in 2015-2016. Gosh, now who was the Executive in charge of that Department during that time frame? Odd that an agency under his control would produce such fraudulent numbers in order to advance their agenda.
"The CRDC accepts correction requests for up to one year from the moment the submission period opens. For the 2015-16 collection, the corrections period closed on June 30, 2018, and for this reason your data correction request cannot be accepted. However, a data note will be included on the data file to ensure users are aware of the errors you are reporting."
Again, the faulty numbers are due less to agenda and more to general government incompetence. Those with agendas will use the shitty numbers.
-
You are a living cliche.Sledog said:
Figures never lie but liars figure.ThomasFremont said:
ThudSledog said:They count anything that happens close to a school. When you live in shit town with shit people they don't care if they commit crimes near a school. But counting stuff that isn't actually at the school is the liberals way of fudging numbers for political purposes.
-
Kid's are fucking pussies these days. When I was a kid, we'd shoot at school in the snow. Uphill. Both ways. Nobody bitched about it either.
-
gRUNDLE STOP!!!GrundleStiltzkin said:
In this case, you have the Trump administration to blame.SFGbob said:
Curious how the "shitty numbers" almost always favor the Rat party's policy positions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Pressing. The article doesn't explicitly say when the survey was conducted, but the period for which it was requesting data was school year 2015-16. This paragraph seem to indicate the survey collection began June 2017.SFGbob said:The US Education Department in 2015-2016. Gosh, now who was the Executive in charge of that Department during that time frame? Odd that an agency under his control would produce such fraudulent numbers in order to advance their agenda.
"The CRDC accepts correction requests for up to one year from the moment the submission period opens. For the 2015-16 collection, the corrections period closed on June 30, 2018, and for this reason your data correction request cannot be accepted. However, a data note will be included on the data file to ensure users are aware of the errors you are reporting."
Again, the faulty numbers are due less to agenda and more to general government incompetence. Those with agendas will use the shitty numbers.
Trump does no wrong.
