Mollie Tibbetts' death being used to spread 'racist, false narrative,' relative says
Comments
-
Yes the person who posts facts and links is the ignorant one.RaceBannon said:
He's really that ignorant on all topicsSFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY -
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't. -
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag. -
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative. -
2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment -
Why so mad bro?SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment
Head injury?
Financial problems?
Small penis?
Job taken by immigrant?
Mommy issues?
Repressed sexuality?
We care Bob. Isn’t doesn’t have to be this way. -
Mad? Exposing liberals for the lying dipshits they are is what gets me up in the morning.
-
Technically OBK pointed to the shirty article.. That's my bad for confusing you two fucksticks.SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment
That being said, Hillary isn't in power to do shit. Correct? And she clarified what she meant by her comment. This country won't tolerate what happened in Australia. And Hillary, while a fuckstick herself. Knows that. -
The best part is. You still haven't put forth anyone in power that wants to take your guns.SFGbob said:Mad? Exposing liberals for the lying dipshits they are is what gets me up in the morning.


