Mollie Tibbetts' death being used to spread 'racist, false narrative,' relative says
Comments
-
California representative Eric Swalwell for one.2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberalstotalitarians will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
Also, people who want to seize guns are not liberals. They are totalitarian scum. HTH.
https://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/this-democratic-congressman-wants-to-take-your-guns-away-at-least-hes-honest -
Who the fuck is Mollie Tibbits and why should I care?
-
I didn't know 1 out of 435 means he has power. That being said, your Washington examiner article is shit. Read that then read what was actually written by him in the USA today.oregonblitzkrieg said:
California representative Eric Swalwell for one.2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberalstotalitarians will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
Also, people who want to seize guns are not liberals. They are totalitarian scum. HTH.
https://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/this-democratic-congressman-wants-to-take-your-guns-away-at-least-hes-honest -
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook. -
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook. -
Please let the democrats get totally SKULLFUCKED in November so they see how voters despise their out of touch, extremist agenda.
-
Position of power? Check. Liberal? Check. Moving the goalposts again, I see.2001400ex said:
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook.
She’s also considering a run for President in 2020. -
Don't forgot they're running Marxists also that openly state that they want to end capitalism. A majority of the "Justice Democrats" won their primaries. Justice Democrats are actually 'democratic socialists.' They changed their name because they're a bunch of pussies. Rats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQKWUAITIgk -
I stopped watching when they were celebrating 7 wins and 6 losses.oregonblitzkrieg said:Don't forgot they're running Marxists also that openly state that they want to end capitalism. A majority of the "Justice Democrats" won their primaries. Justice Democrats are actually 'democratic socialists.' They changed their name because they're a bunch of pussies. Rats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQKWUAITIgk -
Um no. None of them have power to enact shit. I said someone of actual power to do so.USMChawk said:
Position of power? Check. Liberal? Check. Moving the goalposts again, I see.2001400ex said:
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook.
She’s also considering a run for President in 2020. -
2001400ex said:
Um no. None of them have power to enact shit. I said someone of actual power to do so.USMChawk said:
Position of power? Check. Liberal? Check. Moving the goalposts again, I see.2001400ex said:
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook.
She’s also considering a run for President in 2020.
-
Under our Constitution no one person has the power to enact shit, ergo no one with power wants to take guns from people since no one has the power to do it alone.2001400ex said:
Um no. None of them have power to enact shit. I said someone of actual power to do so.USMChawk said:
Position of power? Check. Liberal? Check. Moving the goalposts again, I see.2001400ex said:
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook.
She’s also considering a run for President in 2020.
Hondo logic best logic. -
We should just fuck first and then decide whether the emotional stuff is worth it.SFGbob said:Damn, I still need to figure out how this board works. I'll get an avatar in due time boys, I'm not even sure if we're dating yet.
-
There are a whole bunch of liberal (commie) asshat politicians that will take them if they get a chance. They are constantly working against America just like you. That's the problem.2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Having a secure border didn't use to be an 'agenda.' It's become an agenda because one side whores itself desperately and sells the U.S. down the river just to secure more votes, and therefore doesn't believe in borders or laws anymore.
-
Stay.SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
But get an Avatar. -
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY -
He's really that ignorant on all topicsSFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY -
I believe Race missed my poont herednc said:
Under our Constitution no one person has the power to enact shit, ergo no one with power wants to take guns from people since no one has the power to do it alone.2001400ex said:
Um no. None of them have power to enact shit. I said someone of actual power to do so.USMChawk said:
Position of power? Check. Liberal? Check. Moving the goalposts again, I see.2001400ex said:
Diane was 1 of 435. No clue on Janet but still. You are like 250 short of making this happen.USMChawk said:
Both Diane Feinstein and Janet Napalitano have advocated for restricting combat veterans gun rights. They were both in positions of power at the time they made them.2001400ex said:
Kinda like saying liberals are trying to take your guns when no liberal in actual power is trying to take your guns.USMChawk said:I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
Straw men, and red herrings, that’s the hondo playbook.
She’s also considering a run for President in 2020.
Hondo logic best logic. -
No one can provide an answer. Guess I was right about not caring.PurpleJ said:Who the fuck is Mollie Tibbits and why should I care?
-
Yes the person who posts facts and links is the ignorant one.RaceBannon said:
He's really that ignorant on all topicsSFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY -
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't. -
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag. -
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative. -
2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment -
Why so mad bro?SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment
Head injury?
Financial problems?
Small penis?
Job taken by immigrant?
Mommy issues?
Repressed sexuality?
We care Bob. Isn’t doesn’t have to be this way. -
Mad? Exposing liberals for the lying dipshits they are is what gets me up in the morning.
-
Technically OBK pointed to the shirty article.. That's my bad for confusing you two fucksticks.SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
So are you liar or a moron? I didn’t point to any member of the House, I posted one link that showed Hillary calling for Australian style gun control.2001400ex said:
No you pointed to one member of the house that suggested a gun buyback program. And linked to a shit article that didn't represent what he said in the actual article he wrote.SFGbob said:
You claimed that there was no one in a position of power that wanted to take away anyone's guns. The goal posts have now moved again to where your position appears to be that a majority of all Rat Congressmen don't favor laws that would take away anyone's guns.2001400ex said:
These scary liberals had full control of everything with even 60 votes in the Senate and all they churned out was a shitty health Care bill.SFGbob said:
Anyone who is advocating for a ban on "assault" weapons. Anyone who is advocating for "Australian" style gun control. And there are plenty of people in power who have called for both. Are you really that ignorant on this topic?2001400ex said:
Lol you are knew at this. I get it. So I'll start slow. Ok. You ready sugar bear? Answer this question. What liberal, in actual power to do so, is actually calling to take one gun from one person?SFGbob said:
By thinking David Hogg is more powerful than the NRA? Lol ok!
I never said that. Hell I have less than 10 posts here and I'm already being greeted with the strawman ass fuck.
You claimed that both sides use these shootings to advance their agenda. It's the left that is advancing the agenda of restricting gun rights. The NRA isn't promoting any laws making it mandatory for everyone to purchase a hand gun. The left is the one who uses these shooting to restrict existing gun laws. Claiming a pox on both their houses when the NRA objects to the David Hoggs of the world who want to restrict everyone's gun rights is a very faulty comparison. The NRA promotes an agenda of "liberals will take your guns" when fucking liberals are out there advocating that they want to take people's guns.
PS learn how to use the quote feature.
youtube.com/watch?v=JctBYrIaKvY
HTH but I know it won't.
I'll take that as my first white flag.
I said 1 person in actual power to do so. I know your news source presents the idea that liberals want to take your guns. And yes there are a few fringe Democrats who present the idea of having gun buybacks for assault weapons (whatever that is). But buy and large, liberals support the second amendment even if that doesn't agree with your narrative.
What’s the news source you have that’s compelled you to put your head so far up your ass? If you’re calling for Australian style gun control you don’t support the 2nd Amendment
That being said, Hillary isn't in power to do shit. Correct? And she clarified what she meant by her comment. This country won't tolerate what happened in Australia. And Hillary, while a fuckstick herself. Knows that. -
The best part is. You still haven't put forth anyone in power that wants to take your guns.SFGbob said:Mad? Exposing liberals for the lying dipshits they are is what gets me up in the morning.
