obk is having himself a little spaz fit because he's getting punked like the prison bitch that gets passed around the cell block. I think it's because he likes being the punk. It's the only reasonable explanation for the outlandishly stupid bullshit spewing out of that cockgobbler on his face.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn. American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof. Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law. Your end game is to ban guns.You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter. 1. Correct.2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.Proceed.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn. American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof. Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law. Your end game is to ban guns.You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn. American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof. Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law. Your end game is to ban guns.You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter. 1. Correct.2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.Proceed. "dflea""Titan"lol
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn. American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof. Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law. Your end game is to ban guns.You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter. 1. Correct.2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.Proceed. "dflea""Titan"lol I own you, punk.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA. OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game. Things benchwarmers say $500 Alex
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA. OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA. OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game. Things benchwarmers say $500 Alex Yes; I am most definitely a spectator on this one. The others have it well in hand.There's no shame in it man. We all have bad days. Today is most definitely one of yours. Probably time to consider the wisdom of the cewg motto: pack it in and start over tomorrow.
I watched the video and to no surprise it was same ol accounts of the inequities of decades and centuries ago with a twist of a few black people being shot by police because they can’t listen 9/10.He also inaccurately states that people can peaceably protest anywhere and when they want. You can’t. Most people would get fired for what they’re doing, which again for the majority is attention whoring. While He speaks respectfully, if not eloquently, there is No “it” factor with this guy, Whether He gets by Lyin Ted or not. Protest on your dime with your own time if you truly wish to do something other than get likes on your Twatter or Instagram. You're just too used to dealing with me. There are degrees of "it" factor. I'm on the extreme end. Don't judge others by my example. I'm too good.
I watched the video and to no surprise it was same ol accounts of the inequities of decades and centuries ago with a twist of a few black people being shot by police because they can’t listen 9/10.He also inaccurately states that people can peaceably protest anywhere and when they want. You can’t. Most people would get fired for what they’re doing, which again for the majority is attention whoring. While He speaks respectfully, if not eloquently, there is No “it” factor with this guy, Whether He gets by Lyin Ted or not. Protest on your dime with your own time if you truly wish to do something other than get likes on your Twatter or Instagram.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA. Fear governs your life.You cast yourself as a victim.You blame your troubles on others.Your refuse to take personal responsibility for your own life.But don't worry, dude, I still want you and your ilk to have good healthcare, a secure retirement, clean air to breathe, access to clean water, and the opportunity to work or start a business. I want you to be at peace and free from suffering.
Beta is a great first name for a democrat.
It's Texas.Fucker can be as articulate as @Passion boy Barack Obama.But he'll lose by 10 and consider it a morale victory and always have this little speech to jerk off with.
Beta is a great first name for a democrat. He'd knock you the fuck out in 2 seconds, bitch boy.
Beta is a great first name for a democrat. He'd knock you the fuck out in 2 seconds, bitch boy. OBK legit probably is 450 pounds and lives in a trailer and lives on welfare checks. Biggest bitch around.
